Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"
You would have hoped he'd try get a trade-down then... Benson over some of the (ostensible) 1st round DC WR's is a tough one to swallow
Yeah, never a great thing to read "needed the top RB on my board because that's my teams weakness"
I have Benson in the same tier as a bunch of WRs still available on my board. I'm deep at WR and my only need is RB where I only had one. It's also very difficult to trade for RBs in this league so I turned to the draft for a legit shot at my RB 2 instead of my WR 6/7.
Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will be soon off the board. His ADP ids currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7
Interesting that CW went at the same spot as ADP. I wonder if that ADP drops a bit after we see landing spots - I bet it does. Once WRs and RBs land, CW will get pushed down. If, for instance, Benson goes to DAL he's going to vault up boards and for sure be picked before CW.MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:13 amI have Benson in the same tier as a bunch of WRs still available on my board. I'm deep at WR and my only need is RB where I only had one. It's also very difficult to trade for RBs in this league so I turned to the draft for a legit shot at my RB 2 instead of my WR 6/7.
As for Williams he went right where the DLF 1 QB March Rookie ADP has him going. 1.07
MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 amI Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will soon be off the board. His ADP is currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7
oh and the actual quote is:
"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."
When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need
That, I agree with.MARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:13 amMARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 amI Spent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will soon be off the board. His ADP is currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7
oh and the actual quote is:
"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."
When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need
Glad I don’t use that site for anything then.Shcritters wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:34 pm For what it’s worth KTC has it even but slightly favoring the Picks side
Makes sense to me, plus next pick was rb also, so definitely not absurd to go Trey the pick beforeMARKinMI wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 3:15 amSpent the better part of 2 months trying to trade down, including all of draft day. I have Benson in the same tier as the other WRs that will be soon off the board. His ADP ids currently 10, I took him at 8. I can live with that rather than drafting what would be my WR6/7
oh and the actual quote is:
"A bit of a reach here. I like some WRs and a few RBs around this area and chose to take the Top RB on my board. Which is also my team's biggest need."
When all things are equal between positions in a tier I go with need
Can’t wait to see how this one agesCameron Giles wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pmOne of the few trades that should be vetoed.SoftwoodGrampian wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:52 pmWith the hope that someday 1.4 becomes half as good as JJ, and the 1.5 nearly as good as rookie phenom Jordan Addison.
Nabers Naberscazzie33 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:59 pmCan’t wait to see how this one agesCameron Giles wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:14 pmOne of the few trades that should be vetoed.SoftwoodGrampian wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:52 pm
With the hope that someday 1.4 becomes half as good as JJ, and the 1.5 nearly as good as rookie phenom Jordan Addison.
Everyone has starry eyes and celebrity worship over JJ but aren’t looking at total roster makeup. My projection is that was a good trade for both.
A. Richardson long term potential huge upgrade over D. Carr , Bowers isn’t a for sure thing but could be an elite TE and upgrade over L. Musgrave (who I like too but has injury riddled last cpl seasons) at the very least you have depth starters @ weak position. Nabers was already added in draft in hopes of mitigating loss of JJ so B. Thomas has to replace Addison. Pretty good roster turnover for long term gain.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Lumps and 5 guests