Big deal for Lamar/Kelce

[mzkp54]

Team 1 in sig.

Give:
Stafford
Ferguson
Evans
2 '24 1sts (both mid: 1.05-1.08)
'25 2nd

Get:
Lamar
Kelce

Thoughts? I'm 10-1 and the current favorite

[tstafford]

Nope. Too expensive. Those picks are gold. I get that this makes you a stronger contender, but it isn't worth the price.

[Gator Sens]

I think it's a bit pricey even though these are two big pieces to add. If you can hold out one of the 1sts or Evans, it's a great deal or find a different structure for just Jackson as Stafford looks to be risky moving forward.

[mzkp54]

This is a counter to my offer without Evans. What do you think of swapping Kirk in for Evans?

It's pricey but I can actually afford it. I had Evans, Kirk, and Nacua on my bench this week with my offensive depth.

[tstafford]

I for sure wouldn't swap in Kirk for Evans.

I'd want to get one of the picks out of the deal at a minimum

[Gator Sens]

This is a counter to my offer without Evans. What do you think of swapping Kirk in for Evans?

It's pricey but I can actually afford it. I had Evans, Kirk, and Nacua on my bench this week with my offensive depth.

It's still pricey even with subbing in Kirk.

[TheTroll]

This deal should have a disclaimer: “Warning this trade contains graphic content and disturbing images”.

[24FlavorsofFun]

You've got Hock and Kittle already. So even though TEP I don't think you need to add Kelce.

I'd look to move and add a lesser QB like Dobbs for cheap.

Hold your picks.

[moishetreats]

Obviously, contracts come to into play here. And Jackson is actually on my "sell" list.

But I think that Stafford, Ferguson, Evans, mid 1st, and 2025 2nd is cheap for Jackson.
And that a mid-1st is cheap for Kelce (especially in a TEP).

Seems like a big win to me.

[BigBawseRoss]

seems fine to me, i wouldnt trade away lamar for stafford evans fergeson and a first (id consider that a deal) i would pay a first and a 2nd for kelce.