London or Mooney +

[Kox1707]

Should I give up Mooney and the 1.07 for London?

[Gator Sens]

Value is easily with London here for me. His QB situation is a concern but he is a valuable young WR with room to grow point wise. Mooney had his flash two years ago but was a huge disappointment last year and a gamble moving forward.

[Needalife]

Nope. No way I make this move in a 14 team SuperFlex. I'd probably do it in a 10-team league but this is not that.

Given your roster, you are clearly in rebuild. In a league of this size, I'd prefer to hold multiple viable assets in this situation rather than consolidating. 1.07 and London are about equal given the draft class. That could end up being a guy like Levis for you where you will need QBs to compete one day. Mooney should not be a "throw in". He has early 2nd round value and should be treated/traded as such.

It's not a terrible deal if you are bullish on London and think he is going to be a top 10 WR in this league but the 1.07 this year should be a comparable or better prospect IMO.

[moishetreats]

Yes. I'm with Needalife about multiple assets in a rebuild, but this trade is an exception for me.

I'm a believer in London, not so much in Mooney. And you've positioned yourself with a LOT of draft capital (purposefully, I'm guessing) so that you can take advantage of these kind of opportunities without undermining your rebuild. So, yes for me.

[Prison_Mike]

Yes. I'm with Needalife about multiple assets in a rebuild, but this trade is an exception for me.

I'm a believer in London, not so much in Mooney. And you've positioned yourself with a LOT of draft capital (purposefully, I'm guessing) so that you can take advantage of these kind of opportunities without undermining your rebuild. So, yes for me.

x2

[murphysxm]

Mooney should not be a "throw in". He has early 2nd round value and should be treated/traded as such.

I fall in between this statement. I agree he is not a throw in, but I also don't think he holds anywhere near early 2nd value. I think the trade gives you the best chance of the three assets involved to walk away with a piece for your future team. Go for it

[BigBawseRoss]

yes for sure with all those picks this is is a smart move to turn some picks into proven talent. couldnt care less about mooney personally sorry mooney fans

[Jigga94]

Nope. No way I make this move in a 14 team SuperFlex. I'd probably do it in a 10-team league but this is not that.

Given your roster, you are clearly in rebuild. In a league of this size, I'd prefer to hold multiple viable assets in this situation rather than consolidating. 1.07 and London are about equal given the draft class. That could end up being a guy like Levis for you where you will need QBs to compete one day. Mooney should not be a "throw in". He has early 2nd round value and should be treated/traded as such.

It's not a terrible deal if you are bullish on London and think he is going to be a top 10 WR in this league but the 1.07 this year should be a comparable or better prospect IMO.

x2. Not a bad deal for London, but I feel like you're tossing Mooney away. hes got good value in a 14 tm

[Kox1707]

Tanks for allthe advice. Made the Deal and feel pretty good about it!

[LMS123]

We know what Mooney is, he's a good piece but never gonna be a WR1, with you draft capital you have I'd pair him with the 1.07 in a class where the WR talent doesn't look great and go get London who dominated the opportunities in that offence as a rookie

[MucBuc]

I would pay that for London.

[Panthers357]

London for me