1.03 in 2023, but SF in 2024… (POLL)

[FKC]

This is for the team in my sig. I have won the league the last four seasons. The league is becoming a super flex league in 2024. I have the 1.03 in the upcoming draft via trade. With the 1.03 would you select a quarterback knowing that the league is becoming a super flex league in 2024 or would you go best player available regardless position? I am leaning toward quarterback. What do you think?

[Gator Sens]

Congrats on a monster run with the four-peat!

I would see where the value falls within the draft as the offseason unfolds. If you get the feeling your league mates are not planning forward and you want to take a QB, I would trade back. Add an asset or two via trade with a later pick and still draft your QB. Keep your hand of the pulse of the league this offseason and try and gauge the value of moving back and the likelihood of still landing a top QB for the SF switch coming.

[murphysxm]

For me you take a QB regardless. They are very hard to acquire in SF when you pick in the backside of round 1 and your roster points to being a contender for awhile. Your depth and starters everywhere else are not an issue. Take the QB and plan ahead

[BigBawseRoss]

qb will likely be bpa at 1.03 so moot point. you wont have a shot at qb with your 2nds so might as well take qb early and then go rb wr te whatever you like at 203 and 204

[Jigga94]

Yeah QB is the BPA at 1.03

[FKC]

Congrats on a monster run with the four-peat!

I would see where the value falls within the draft as the offseason unfolds. If you get the feeling your league mates are not planning forward and you want to take a QB, I would trade back. Add an asset or two via trade with a later pick and still draft your QB. Keep your hand of the pulse of the league this offseason and try and gauge the value of moving back and the likelihood of still landing a top QB for the SF switch coming.

Thank you! That’s not an option I really thought about. I’ll definitely have to consider that.

[FKC]

For me you take a QB regardless. They are very hard to acquire in SF when you pick in the backside of round 1 and your roster points to being a contender for awhile. Your depth and starters everywhere else are not an issue. Take the QB and plan ahead

Great point. Part of the reason I’m leaning toward a QB, plus to get a jump on the SF aspect.

[FKC]

qb will likely be bpa at 1.03 so moot point. you wont have a shot at qb with your 2nds so might as well take qb early and then go rb wr te whatever you like at 203 and 204

That’s what I was thinking anyway.