Skyy Moore might be really really good...
But no shade if you are wanting to diversify.
Teams aren’t scouting for fantasy football. What’s valuable in real football does not always mean the same thing as what’s valuable in fantasy football.Ice wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:02 amAnd I said; “ Isn’t it Great “ while actually commenting on two good players.Anteaters wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:08 amI wasn't debating your take that Cook might be the next great RB2 in fantasy football. If he's your guy, I'm all for any of us making the move to get our guys. Whether the player hits or not, getting your guy and rising-or-falling with that decision is one of the fun parts of our hobby.
I was just making the factual comparison of their college careers. You'll notice I said nothing about projecting Cook's NFL production in that post.
I will add it is ironic you would call a player a “full time RB” in a college sport when they now actually have a REAL full time careers in the NFL.
Seems only one however was drafted because professionals saw the talent jump off the screen regardless of number of Carries or Receptions.
Like Fantasy Football, Scouting obviously isn’t an exact science.
This is something so important that gets glossed over at every position basically irl nfl has a different criteria of importance.Chwf3rd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 9:21 amTeams aren’t scouting for fantasy football. What’s valuable in real football does not always mean the same thing as what’s valuable in fantasy football.Ice wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:02 amAnd I said; “ Isn’t it Great “ while actually commenting on two good players.Anteaters wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:08 am
I wasn't debating your take that Cook might be the next great RB2 in fantasy football. If he's your guy, I'm all for any of us making the move to get our guys. Whether the player hits or not, getting your guy and rising-or-falling with that decision is one of the fun parts of our hobby.
I was just making the factual comparison of their college careers. You'll notice I said nothing about projecting Cook's NFL production in that post.
I will add it is ironic you would call a player a “full time RB” in a college sport when they now actually have a REAL full time careers in the NFL.
Seems only one however was drafted because professionals saw the talent jump off the screen regardless of number of Carries or Receptions.
Like Fantasy Football, Scouting obviously isn’t an exact science.
While that may be true I think the two should be a LOT closer than NFL ppl would like to admit. Typically if a player isn’t good for FF they don’t stick on a roster for very long.Chwf3rd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 9:21 amTeams aren’t scouting for fantasy football. What’s valuable in real football does not always mean the same thing as what’s valuable in fantasy football.Ice wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:02 amAnd I said; “ Isn’t it Great “ while actually commenting on two good players.Anteaters wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:08 am
I wasn't debating your take that Cook might be the next great RB2 in fantasy football. If he's your guy, I'm all for any of us making the move to get our guys. Whether the player hits or not, getting your guy and rising-or-falling with that decision is one of the fun parts of our hobby.
I was just making the factual comparison of their college careers. You'll notice I said nothing about projecting Cook's NFL production in that post.
I will add it is ironic you would call a player a “full time RB” in a college sport when they now actually have a REAL full time careers in the NFL.
Seems only one however was drafted because professionals saw the talent jump off the screen regardless of number of Carries or Receptions.
Like Fantasy Football, Scouting obviously isn’t an exact science.
Yeah, Moore over Cook easily for me. Cook landed in an optimal situation for a receiving back, but Moore just has a lot more juice long-term.mild wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 5:05 pmSkyy Moore might be really really good...
But no shade if you are wanting to diversify.
It is really a function of how you individually value the player. I don't think I have seen Cook go top 2 but I have seen him selected beginning 1.3. I value him around 1.8 to 1.11 range with production upside in the future personally.
Cook over Wilson and Williams but not Olave. InterestingdipANDglide wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:14 pmI don't see any issue taking Cook over Wilson or Williams in the middle of the 1st. I wouldn't pass on Olave.
Interesting is a nice way to put it.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:34 pmCook over Wilson and Williams but not Olave. InterestingdipANDglide wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:14 pmI don't see any issue taking Cook over Wilson or Williams in the middle of the 1st. I wouldn't pass on Olave.
you guys are nicer than I. Cook is well behind them all. Period. The Cook hype smells of VaughnJFever wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 3:08 pmInteresting is a nice way to put it.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:34 pmCook over Wilson and Williams but not Olave. InterestingdipANDglide wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:14 pm
I don't see any issue taking Cook over Wilson or Williams in the middle of the 1st. I wouldn't pass on Olave.
I agree here, although maybe not to that extent. I find it hard to believe he’ll suddenly be a top 5 - or even top 10 - back when he never showed he could handle the load in college, but I also don’t think he’s going to be completely irrelevant like Vaughn was last year. I could see both Cook and Singles being high RB3s or low RB2s in PPR, but unless he puts 15 lbs into his legs or catches 80 passes I think he’ll be a limited ceiling player.
That is truly a terrible take most likely designed just for clicks.
Users browsing this forum: Jigga94 and 5 guests