Thoughts on Mark Andrews

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
Shankopotamus
Starter
Starter
Posts: 675
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:40 am

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby Shankopotamus » Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:01 pm

I'm not sure of the breakdown, but it felt like he scored 70% of his points after Lamar went down. Sadly, he couldn't will me beyond the first round of the playoffs this year.
12 Team Super-Flex TEP Dynasty
22 CHAMP :dance:
(2019 & 2020 Runner-Up) :wall:


1 QB, 3 RB, 4 WR, Flex, SF, 2 TE

3 DL, 3 LB, 3 DB, 1 Flex IDP


QB- Justin Herbert, Baker Mayfield, Deshaun Watson, Marcus Mariota, Gardner Minshew, Sam Ehlinger
RB- D’Andre Swift, Nick Chubb, Javonte Williams, Cam Akers, Kyren Williams, Jerome Ford, D’Ernest Johnson, Darrell Henderson
WR- DK Metcalf, DJ Moore, Chris Godwin, Jameson Williams, Gabe Davis, Hollywood Brown, Josh Reynolds, Calvin Austin, Laviska Shenault, Kyle Phillips
TE-Mark Andrews, Greg Dulcich, Isaiah Likely, Donald Parham, Tyler Conklin
DL-Danielle Hunter, Nick Bosa, Deforest Buckner, Jonathon Allen
LB- Micah Parsons, Jack Sanborn, Logan Wilson, Cole Holcomb, Nakobe Dean, Brian Asamoah
DB-Jeremy Chinn, Jalen Pitre, Jalen Thompson, Kam Curl, Darrick Forrest
K-Tyler Bass

PPE82
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:03 pm

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby PPE82 » Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am

Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
Team 1
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-6RB, 2-6WR, 1-5TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots


Kyler Murray, Rudolph, Brissett, Brady
Keaton Mitchell, scrubs
Jefferson, Lamb, Waddle, DeVonta Smith, Rashee Rice, Christian Watson, Dotson, Josh Palmer, Rashid Shaheed, Toney, Justyn Ross, Metchie, Ronnie Bell
Pitts, Likely
2024 Picks: 1.02, 2.02, 2.06, 2.09, 4.02, 4.12

Team 2
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-5RB, 3-6WR, 1-4TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots


Lawrence, Richardson, Young, Mac Jones, Lance, Brady, Bennnet, Haener
Bijan, Charbonnet, Strong Jr., scrubs
Wilson, Nacua, Flowers, Downs, Wicks, Renfrow, Ross, Bell, Metchie
Pitts, Woods
2024 Picks: 1.02, 1.05, 1.06, 1.09, 3.09, 4.02, 4.09

User avatar
dynastyninja
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4174
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:17 pm

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby dynastyninja » Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:40 am

PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I think the talent has always been there. Target share & target quality have been the question. I feel good about his prospects moving forward.

CGW
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6634
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby CGW » Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:06 am

PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.

His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9

He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.

Jigga94
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 16149
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:38 pm

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby Jigga94 » Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:27 am

CGW wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:06 am
PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.

His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9

He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.
2019 he had 6.5 targets per game I believe.

2021 he definitely saw a jump but remember, Lamar missed 6 games (counting the CLE one where he only threw 4 passes).

Andrews still saw a jump with Lamar at 8 targets per game. But he was close to 11 targets per game without Lamar. I pretty much agree with you though. Hard to see him not getting 100+ targets as that's only 6 per game, which he has averaged since his sophomore year

CGW
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6634
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby CGW » Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:08 am

Jigga94 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:27 am
CGW wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:06 am
PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.

His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9

He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.
2019 he had 6.5 targets per game I believe.

2021 he definitely saw a jump but remember, Lamar missed 6 games (counting the CLE one where he only threw 4 passes).

Andrews still saw a jump with Lamar at 8 targets per game. But he was close to 11 targets per game without Lamar. I pretty much agree with you though. Hard to see him not getting 100+ targets as that's only 6 per game, which he has averaged since his sophomore year
You are right. 6.5 per game. Thanks for correcting, must have made a typo. Point stands, I cant imagine him getting less than his standard 6.5ish and more likely to push 7-8 realistically.

Glad I picked him up his rookie year while everyone was drooling over Hurst.

User avatar
_yeti
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1535
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:21 am

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby _yeti » Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:23 am

Shankopotamus wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:01 pm I'm not sure of the breakdown, but it felt like he scored 70% of his points after Lamar went down. Sadly, he couldn't will me beyond the first round of the playoffs this year.
Like 30% but he had games like that with Lamar too

Image
Remember where you are - this is Thunderdome.
*5 leagues (est. 2015, '17, '18, '18, '22, 6 total 'ships)

12 Team SF, PPR, TE Prem., DT prem., IDP Start 10, QB, 1SF, 2-4 RB, 2-5 WR, 1-3 TE, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 1 IDPflex
QB: J. Fields, B. Mayfield, G. Smith, M. Mariota, S. Darnold
RB: T. Etienne, T. Pollard, S. Barkley, J.Jacobs A. Jones, , A. Gibson, D. Harris, Z. Moss, E. Elliott
WR: G. Wilson, T. Higgins, T. McLaurin C. Kirk, D. Hopkins, K. Toney. K. Osborn, M. Hardman
TE: T.J. Hockenson, K. Pitts, H. Henry
DL: M. Parsons, Q. Williams, D. Buckner, R. Gary
LB: F. Oluokun, R. Smith, A. Anzalone. L. David
DB: B. Baker, J. Metellus, R. Grant

Ray Finkle
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby Ray Finkle » Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:56 am

I’m considering adding to Andrews in attempt to turn him into Pitts. As a contender though, I’m hesitant as I think Andrews the next couple seasons could be what Kelce has been the last several…before Pitts then has the position on lockdown for a while.

Ice
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6622
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 6:17 pm

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby Ice » Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:23 am

Ray Finkle wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:56 am I’m considering adding to Andrews in attempt to turn him into Pitts. As a contender though, I’m hesitant as I think Andrews the next couple seasons could be what Kelce has been the last several…before Pitts then has the position on lockdown for a while.
Nothing wrong with the plan but Andrews is a stud. Long term I like Pitts but I view both these players as tier 1 TE's and the Ravens are way more stable at the moment.

I wouldn't add much unless Atlanta wins the Sweepstakes and Pitts isn't part of the package.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts

User avatar
mild
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5899
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:23 pm
Location: the Jalen Hurts bus

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby mild » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:27 pm

dynastyninja wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:40 am
PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I think the talent has always been there. Target share & target quality have been the question. I feel good about his prospects moving forward.
The only thing I can think of is that the Ravens might get back to a bit more running in 2022 with Dobbins and Gus Bus coming back. The Run has historically been their favoured identity, and their moves so far in FA are pointing to wanting to get back to that.

But even then, I don't think that's a true negative - as committing to the Run more still keeps the TE on the field, and opens Andrews up as the obvious primary read on Play Action calls out of Heavy sets.

dondickenson
Starter
Starter
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 10:52 am

Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE

Postby dondickenson » Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:42 pm

mild wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:27 pm
dynastyninja wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:40 am
PPE82 wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:34 am Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
I think the talent has always been there. Target share & target quality have been the question. I feel good about his prospects moving forward.
The only thing I can think of is that the Ravens might get back to a bit more running in 2022 with Dobbins and Gus Bus coming back. The Run has historically been their favoured identity, and their moves so far in FA are pointing to wanting to get back to that.

But even then, I don't think that's a true negative - as committing to the Run more still keeps the TE on the field, and opens Andrews up as the obvious primary read on Play Action calls out of Heavy sets.
I don’t disagree that the Ravens will probably run a bit more than 2021. But I also doubt they get back to their ways of 2019/2020, when the only weapons were a less developed young trio of LJax/Hollywood/Andrews. Now all 3 are mature and add to that a second year Bateman. They’re gonna throw more than in 2019/2020. Somewhere in between the run-pass split they had then and the split from 2021 imo is what we see.

olmansmith
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby olmansmith » Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am

How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.

ericanadian
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6519
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:13 pm

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby ericanadian » Wed May 03, 2023 3:09 pm

olmansmith wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
OJ Howard put up 565 yards and six TDs on a 40% snap share in 2018 under Monken. I’m not all that worried about it.
All I Der Is Win - 16 Team IDP League (Pass TD 6pts)

QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14292
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby Cameron Giles » Wed May 03, 2023 4:31 pm

olmansmith wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
It's historically rare for a TE to maintain being the #1 option in an offense for so many years. Andrews is still going to have a big year, but don't fade him because he may not be the #1 anymore.

olmansmith
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:45 pm

Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews

Postby olmansmith » Thu May 04, 2023 8:13 am

Cameron Giles wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 4:31 pm
olmansmith wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
It's historically rare for a TE to maintain being the #1 option in an offense for so many years. Andrews is still going to have a big year, but don't fade him because he may not be the #1 anymore.
Yeah not fading him, mostly just doing the mental exercise on the appropriate trade value to acquire him for on a contender. KTC having him for a late 1st + late 2nd feels too low but putting feelers out


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mnnightowl, Shcritters and 48 guests