Thoughts on Mark Andrews
-
- Starter
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:40 am
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
I'm not sure of the breakdown, but it felt like he scored 70% of his points after Lamar went down. Sadly, he couldn't will me beyond the first round of the playoffs this year.
12 Team Super-Flex TEP Dynasty
22 CHAMP
(2019 & 2020 Runner-Up)
1 QB, 3 RB, 4 WR, Flex, SF, 2 TE
3 DL, 3 LB, 3 DB, 1 Flex IDP
QB- Justin Herbert, Baker Mayfield, Deshaun Watson, Marcus Mariota, Gardner Minshew, Sam Ehlinger
RB- D’Andre Swift, Nick Chubb, Javonte Williams, Cam Akers, Kyren Williams, Jerome Ford, D’Ernest Johnson, Darrell Henderson
WR- DK Metcalf, DJ Moore, Chris Godwin, Jameson Williams, Gabe Davis, Hollywood Brown, Josh Reynolds, Calvin Austin, Laviska Shenault, Kyle Phillips
TE-Mark Andrews, Greg Dulcich, Isaiah Likely, Donald Parham, Tyler Conklin
DL-Danielle Hunter, Nick Bosa, Deforest Buckner, Jonathon Allen
LB- Micah Parsons, Jack Sanborn, Logan Wilson, Cole Holcomb, Nakobe Dean, Brian Asamoah
DB-Jeremy Chinn, Jalen Pitre, Jalen Thompson, Kam Curl, Darrick Forrest
K-Tyler Bass
22 CHAMP
(2019 & 2020 Runner-Up)
1 QB, 3 RB, 4 WR, Flex, SF, 2 TE
3 DL, 3 LB, 3 DB, 1 Flex IDP
QB- Justin Herbert, Baker Mayfield, Deshaun Watson, Marcus Mariota, Gardner Minshew, Sam Ehlinger
RB- D’Andre Swift, Nick Chubb, Javonte Williams, Cam Akers, Kyren Williams, Jerome Ford, D’Ernest Johnson, Darrell Henderson
WR- DK Metcalf, DJ Moore, Chris Godwin, Jameson Williams, Gabe Davis, Hollywood Brown, Josh Reynolds, Calvin Austin, Laviska Shenault, Kyle Phillips
TE-Mark Andrews, Greg Dulcich, Isaiah Likely, Donald Parham, Tyler Conklin
DL-Danielle Hunter, Nick Bosa, Deforest Buckner, Jonathon Allen
LB- Micah Parsons, Jack Sanborn, Logan Wilson, Cole Holcomb, Nakobe Dean, Brian Asamoah
DB-Jeremy Chinn, Jalen Pitre, Jalen Thompson, Kam Curl, Darrick Forrest
K-Tyler Bass
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
Was last year an outlier (~150 targets) or is this the new norm?
Team 1
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-6RB, 2-6WR, 1-5TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots
Kyler Murray, Rudolph, Brissett, Brady
Keaton Mitchell, scrubs
Jefferson, Lamb, Waddle, DeVonta Smith, Rashee Rice, Christian Watson, Dotson, Josh Palmer, Rashid Shaheed, Toney, Justyn Ross, Metchie, Ronnie Bell
Pitts, Likely
2024 Picks: 1.02, 2.02, 2.06, 2.09, 4.02, 4.12
Team 2
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-5RB, 3-6WR, 1-4TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots
Lawrence, Richardson, Young, Mac Jones, Lance, Brady, Bennnet, Haener
Bijan, Charbonnet, Strong Jr., scrubs
Wilson, Nacua, Flowers, Downs, Wicks, Renfrow, Ross, Bell, Metchie
Pitts, Woods
2024 Picks: 1.02, 1.05, 1.06, 1.09, 3.09, 4.02, 4.09
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-6RB, 2-6WR, 1-5TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots
Kyler Murray, Rudolph, Brissett, Brady
Keaton Mitchell, scrubs
Jefferson, Lamb, Waddle, DeVonta Smith, Rashee Rice, Christian Watson, Dotson, Josh Palmer, Rashid Shaheed, Toney, Justyn Ross, Metchie, Ronnie Bell
Pitts, Likely
2024 Picks: 1.02, 2.02, 2.06, 2.09, 4.02, 4.12
Team 2
12 Team, SF, PPR, TEP (2PPR)
1-2QB, 2-5RB, 3-6WR, 1-4TE
10 starters, 28 roster spots
Lawrence, Richardson, Young, Mac Jones, Lance, Brady, Bennnet, Haener
Bijan, Charbonnet, Strong Jr., scrubs
Wilson, Nacua, Flowers, Downs, Wicks, Renfrow, Ross, Bell, Metchie
Pitts, Woods
2024 Picks: 1.02, 1.05, 1.06, 1.09, 3.09, 4.02, 4.09
- dynastyninja
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
I'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.
His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9
He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
2019 he had 6.5 targets per game I believe.CGW wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:06 amI'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.
His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9
He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.
2021 he definitely saw a jump but remember, Lamar missed 6 games (counting the CLE one where he only threw 4 passes).
Andrews still saw a jump with Lamar at 8 targets per game. But he was close to 11 targets per game without Lamar. I pretty much agree with you though. Hard to see him not getting 100+ targets as that's only 6 per game, which he has averaged since his sophomore year
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
You are right. 6.5 per game. Thanks for correcting, must have made a typo. Point stands, I cant imagine him getting less than his standard 6.5ish and more likely to push 7-8 realistically.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:27 am2019 he had 6.5 targets per game I believe.CGW wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:06 amI'm not sure he will get quite the same volume going forward, but it's hard to argue with his career trajectory. 100-130 targets seems very doable, plus 8-10 TD.
His targets per game:
2019 - 4.3
2020 - 6.3
2021 - 9
He's at the top of the TE list. Those who want to put Pitts up there for age and outlook are welcome to do so, but I'm not paying much, if any, on top of Andrews to get Pitts.
2021 he definitely saw a jump but remember, Lamar missed 6 games (counting the CLE one where he only threw 4 passes).
Andrews still saw a jump with Lamar at 8 targets per game. But he was close to 11 targets per game without Lamar. I pretty much agree with you though. Hard to see him not getting 100+ targets as that's only 6 per game, which he has averaged since his sophomore year
Glad I picked him up his rookie year while everyone was drooling over Hurst.
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
Like 30% but he had games like that with Lamar tooShankopotamus wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:01 pm I'm not sure of the breakdown, but it felt like he scored 70% of his points after Lamar went down. Sadly, he couldn't will me beyond the first round of the playoffs this year.
Remember where you are - this is Thunderdome.
*5 leagues (est. 2015, '17, '18, '18, '22, 6 total 'ships)
12 Team SF, PPR, TE Prem., DT prem., IDP Start 10, QB, 1SF, 2-4 RB, 2-5 WR, 1-3 TE, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 1 IDPflex
QB: J. Fields, B. Mayfield, G. Smith, M. Mariota, S. Darnold
RB: T. Etienne, T. Pollard, S. Barkley, J.Jacobs A. Jones, , A. Gibson, D. Harris, Z. Moss, E. Elliott
WR: G. Wilson, T. Higgins, T. McLaurin C. Kirk, D. Hopkins, K. Toney. K. Osborn, M. Hardman
TE: T.J. Hockenson, K. Pitts, H. Henry
DL: M. Parsons, Q. Williams, D. Buckner, R. Gary
LB: F. Oluokun, R. Smith, A. Anzalone. L. David
DB: B. Baker, J. Metellus, R. Grant
*5 leagues (est. 2015, '17, '18, '18, '22, 6 total 'ships)
12 Team SF, PPR, TE Prem., DT prem., IDP Start 10, QB, 1SF, 2-4 RB, 2-5 WR, 1-3 TE, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 1 IDPflex
QB: J. Fields, B. Mayfield, G. Smith, M. Mariota, S. Darnold
RB: T. Etienne, T. Pollard, S. Barkley, J.Jacobs A. Jones, , A. Gibson, D. Harris, Z. Moss, E. Elliott
WR: G. Wilson, T. Higgins, T. McLaurin C. Kirk, D. Hopkins, K. Toney. K. Osborn, M. Hardman
TE: T.J. Hockenson, K. Pitts, H. Henry
DL: M. Parsons, Q. Williams, D. Buckner, R. Gary
LB: F. Oluokun, R. Smith, A. Anzalone. L. David
DB: B. Baker, J. Metellus, R. Grant
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:05 am
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
I’m considering adding to Andrews in attempt to turn him into Pitts. As a contender though, I’m hesitant as I think Andrews the next couple seasons could be what Kelce has been the last several…before Pitts then has the position on lockdown for a while.
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
Nothing wrong with the plan but Andrews is a stud. Long term I like Pitts but I view both these players as tier 1 TE's and the Ravens are way more stable at the moment.Ray Finkle wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:56 am I’m considering adding to Andrews in attempt to turn him into Pitts. As a contender though, I’m hesitant as I think Andrews the next couple seasons could be what Kelce has been the last several…before Pitts then has the position on lockdown for a while.
I wouldn't add much unless Atlanta wins the Sweepstakes and Pitts isn't part of the package.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
The only thing I can think of is that the Ravens might get back to a bit more running in 2022 with Dobbins and Gus Bus coming back. The Run has historically been their favoured identity, and their moves so far in FA are pointing to wanting to get back to that.dynastyninja wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:40 amI think the talent has always been there. Target share & target quality have been the question. I feel good about his prospects moving forward.
But even then, I don't think that's a true negative - as committing to the Run more still keeps the TE on the field, and opens Andrews up as the obvious primary read on Play Action calls out of Heavy sets.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 10:52 am
Re: Why Mark Andrew's will finish 2020 as the #1 ranked dynasty TE
I don’t disagree that the Ravens will probably run a bit more than 2021. But I also doubt they get back to their ways of 2019/2020, when the only weapons were a less developed young trio of LJax/Hollywood/Andrews. Now all 3 are mature and add to that a second year Bateman. They’re gonna throw more than in 2019/2020. Somewhere in between the run-pass split they had then and the split from 2021 imo is what we see.mild wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:27 pmThe only thing I can think of is that the Ravens might get back to a bit more running in 2022 with Dobbins and Gus Bus coming back. The Run has historically been their favoured identity, and their moves so far in FA are pointing to wanting to get back to that.dynastyninja wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:40 amI think the talent has always been there. Target share & target quality have been the question. I feel good about his prospects moving forward.
But even then, I don't think that's a true negative - as committing to the Run more still keeps the TE on the field, and opens Andrews up as the obvious primary read on Play Action calls out of Heavy sets.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:45 pm
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6519
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:13 pm
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
OJ Howard put up 565 yards and six TDs on a 40% snap share in 2018 under Monken. I’m not all that worried about it.olmansmith wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
All I Der Is Win - 16 Team IDP League (Pass TD 6pts)
QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker
QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14292
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
It's historically rare for a TE to maintain being the #1 option in an offense for so many years. Andrews is still going to have a big year, but don't fade him because he may not be the #1 anymore.olmansmith wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:45 pm
Re: Thoughts on Mark Andrews
Yeah not fading him, mostly just doing the mental exercise on the appropriate trade value to acquire him for on a contender. KTC having him for a late 1st + late 2nd feels too low but putting feelers outCameron Giles wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 4:31 pmIt's historically rare for a TE to maintain being the #1 option in an offense for so many years. Andrews is still going to have a big year, but don't fade him because he may not be the #1 anymore.olmansmith wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:34 am How are people feeling about Mark Andrews?
The ceiling feels more capped than in the past with healthy OBJ, Bateman, Flowers? Not sure how Monken's tendencies will affect the equations either vs Roman (or maybe just Lamar or lack of other options) targeting Andrews.
Still presumably a top 2 option but the chances he just takes over as the clear #1 with a full season of Lamar feels lower.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mnnightowl, Shcritters and 48 guests