Kyle Pitts Trade

[Pomi4]

I was offered
Javonte and Hockenson for Pitts and late 2023 1st

My team is in the signature. I just can't decide if I can get rid of Pitts

[Z$$$]

Williams/Hockenson for me. Especially with the 1st being late

[Gator Sens]

I like the value of the Williams side. His value is crazy high and you get Hockenson on top. Pitts is a tough asset to sell but the value is here for me. I could understand not wanting to move him though if he is just flat not movable for you.

[Counterfeitjr]

Auto accept.. hockenson is very very good and williams has a ton of potential and very young.

[abloom]

pitts for me in a 10 teamer. especially with that roster.

[DynastyDrum30]

Definitely the Pitts side. This guy has the potential to give you a major advantage at the TE position for many, many years. The value is fairly good. But thinking about the long-term competitive advantage potential - it just isn't nearly enough for me, personally.

[smbkrypt24]

I keep Pitts here easily. I wouldn't want to throw in any 2023 1st to make this trade. I would consider it without the 1st.

[oneson9192]

Hold Pitts. Early in the offseason, I like to evaluate trades by how likely it is that each side gains/loses value over the offseason. If my side is more likely to gain value than lose it, I'll hold off and revisit in the summer, where maybe I can can get a better deal.

Pitts - Most likely changes (if any) are a new QB and/or new WRs. Both help Pitts value slightly. UP
'23 first - Future picks won't change much, but the value should slowly climb until next year's rookie draft. UP

Javonte - Nearly impossible for his value to rise any more. The most likely change is that Melvin resigns, which hurts his short term volume. DOWN
Hockenson - Seems like they might already be done adding WRs. Most likely change is that they draft a rookie QB to develop behind Goff. UP

Overall, I think it's unlikely that the Javonte/Hockenson manager would be unwilling to do the same trade later in the offseason. I'd hold off for now.

[frerichs5]

Hold Pitts. Early in the offseason, I like to evaluate trades by how likely it is that each side gains/loses value over the offseason. If my side is more likely to gain value than lose it, I'll hold off and revisit in the summer, where maybe I can can get a better deal.

Pitts - Most likely changes (if any) are a new QB and/or new WRs. Both help Pitts value slightly. UP
'23 first - Future picks won't change much, but the value should slowly climb until next year's rookie draft. UP

Javonte - Nearly impossible for his value to rise any more. The most likely change is that Melvin resigns, which hurts his short term volume. DOWN
Hockenson - Seems like they might already be done adding WRs. Most likely change is that they draft a rookie QB to develop behind Goff. UP

Overall, I think it's unlikely that the Javonte/Hockenson manager would be unwilling to do the same trade later in the offseason. I'd hold off for now.

I think this is a good way to look at it. Only caveat is you’re banking on them not trading elsewhere in the meantime. So if you’re in love with the players you’re getting back, might be best to pull the trigger now.

[oneson9192]

Hold Pitts. Early in the offseason, I like to evaluate trades by how likely it is that each side gains/loses value over the offseason. If my side is more likely to gain value than lose it, I'll hold off and revisit in the summer, where maybe I can can get a better deal.

Pitts - Most likely changes (if any) are a new QB and/or new WRs. Both help Pitts value slightly. UP
'23 first - Future picks won't change much, but the value should slowly climb until next year's rookie draft. UP

Javonte - Nearly impossible for his value to rise any more. The most likely change is that Melvin resigns, which hurts his short term volume. DOWN
Hockenson - Seems like they might already be done adding WRs. Most likely change is that they draft a rookie QB to develop behind Goff. UP

Overall, I think it's unlikely that the Javonte/Hockenson manager would be unwilling to do the same trade later in the offseason. I'd hold off for now.

I think this is a good way to look at it. Only caveat is you’re banking on them not trading elsewhere in the meantime. So if you’re in love with the players you’re getting back, might be best to pull the trigger now.

Great point. Definitely get your guys. This is more of a tiebreaker for offseason trades.

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

Drop the 23 1st and it's close, but it's Pitts 100% for me.