It 100% did cost them the gameThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:15 pmThat garbage taunting call almost cost CHI the game too. Painful to see a call like that called in such a critical moment
Week 9 Discussion
Re: Week 9 Discussion
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14358
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: Week 9 Discussion
The NFL is consistently out of step with what their fans want. Like, who's really sitting at home watching football and getting upset when players taunt after making a play? Who's getting angry when WRs stare down a corner after making a great catch?
It's like they expect players to be robots.
This could end up costing a team a playoff game. It's that bad. Just let the players play and express themselves.
It's like they expect players to be robots.
This could end up costing a team a playoff game. It's that bad. Just let the players play and express themselves.
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27449
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Week 9 Discussion
I agree in certain situations. Spiking the ball at a guy, or flexing in a guys face, standing over top of him, yeah, don't like it. I think there's way too much posturing and peacocking in today's game. Not expecting them to be robots, but don't need a bunch of crap after a 7 yard reception all the time. My issue is what they are calling, and what they aren't. Trash talking is part of the game. I have no issues with that. I didn't feel the call on the Bears player tonight was an issue at all.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:58 pm The NFL is consistently out of step with what their fans want. Like, who's really sitting at home watching football and getting upset when players taunt after making a play? Who's getting angry when WRs stare down a corner after making a great catch?
It's like they expect players to be robots.
This could end up costing a team a playoff game. It's that bad. Just let the players play and express themselves.
Last edited by FantasyFreak on Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Janiel Dones Truther
Foodie. Mild sauce goes in the trash. Well done steak goes with it.
Habaneros make the best hot sauce. Throwing a bunch of random stuff on top of fries doesn't mean you call it "poutine".
Foodie. Mild sauce goes in the trash. Well done steak goes with it.
Habaneros make the best hot sauce. Throwing a bunch of random stuff on top of fries doesn't mean you call it "poutine".
- thunderTung
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:56 pm
Re: Week 9 Discussion
eh, they managed to get the lead.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:34 pmIt 100% did cost them the gameThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:15 pmThat garbage taunting call almost cost CHI the game too. Painful to see a call like that called in such a critical moment
Would it have helped to have some extra time? ya for sure. But they scored with too much time left, and they shot themselves in the foot on defense and allowed PIT to take the lead back.
I can't blame that on one call
12 man IDP 0.5 ppr
QB(1): Geno Smith
RB(2): ETN/Walker III
WR(2): Chase/Lamb
TE(1): Goedert
FLEX(2): Stevenson/Garrett Wilson
K: Mcpherson
DL(2): T. Walker/Vea
LB(2): D. Long/TJ Edwards
DB(2) Dugger/Moehrig
FLEX: Kenneth Murray
IR: J. Hicks/Milano/Marcus Jones
Bench:
QB: Mac Jones/Bryce Young
RB: Zeke/D. Harris
WR: N. Brown/Demario Douglas/Bobby Trees/Parker/Tyler Scott
TE: Bellinger/Schultz
DL: Barrett/J. Davis/Yannick/
LB: Milano/Edwards/K. Murray/J. Smith
DB: Mathieu/Jonothan Owens
QB(1): Geno Smith
RB(2): ETN/Walker III
WR(2): Chase/Lamb
TE(1): Goedert
FLEX(2): Stevenson/Garrett Wilson
K: Mcpherson
DL(2): T. Walker/Vea
LB(2): D. Long/TJ Edwards
DB(2) Dugger/Moehrig
FLEX: Kenneth Murray
IR: J. Hicks/Milano/Marcus Jones
Bench:
QB: Mac Jones/Bryce Young
RB: Zeke/D. Harris
WR: N. Brown/Demario Douglas/Bobby Trees/Parker/Tyler Scott
TE: Bellinger/Schultz
DL: Barrett/J. Davis/Yannick/
LB: Milano/Edwards/K. Murray/J. Smith
DB: Mathieu/Jonothan Owens
- MFundercover
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 6:30 pm
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Points in my .5ppr leaguejenkins.math wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:22 amWhat's misleading about that? It's currently a fact.dynastyninja wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:06 amYou literally have math in your name. What's the point of that stat other than to mislead?jenkins.math wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:07 am He has as many TD's this year as Dawson Knox, CJ Uzomah, Hunter Henry, and Ertz.
Go back and read my entire statement. People are disappointed in Kelce because he isn't providing the huge positional advantage this year as in year's past. I was also responding to a post that said Kelce is the league leader in TD's this year at the TE. That is true, but shared with the 4 other TEs that I listed.
Kelce - 118
Knox - 71
Uzomah - 74
Henry - 75
Ertz - 65
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Exactly.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:58 pm The NFL is consistently out of step with what their fans want. Like, who's really sitting at home watching football and getting upset when players taunt after making a play? Who's getting angry when WRs stare down a corner after making a great catch?
I think taunting is a stupid thing to do and I don't want to see it from my Niners, but if you don't want to see it, then don't let them make plays that allow them to do it. It's that simple.
Also, taunting usually backfires anyway. For many players it burns a fire in them that makes them want to get even.
These calls are so hard for refs to make. It's not a black and white thing in most cases, it's a gray area and you need to basically guess if a flag needs to be thrown or not.
I don't like the rule. I hate taunting but I don't like the rule.
ULTIMATE RB GURUs
2021 RB Injury Guru: abloom "Akers will suffer an ACL injury in the preseason and does not play during the season."
2021 RB Guru: qazxswedcvfrtgbnhyuj & McCafsteez -- Winners of the Antonio Gibson Wager!
REAL RB GURUs:
CubfanAA - Anteaters - Ice - JJRules - TheNuts - jtk1234 - Bronco Billy - YouMightDieTryin - hockeyBjj - honcho55 - murphysxm - Patsfan86 - jman3134
2021 RB Injury Guru: abloom "Akers will suffer an ACL injury in the preseason and does not play during the season."
2021 RB Guru: qazxswedcvfrtgbnhyuj & McCafsteez -- Winners of the Antonio Gibson Wager!
REAL RB GURUs:
CubfanAA - Anteaters - Ice - JJRules - TheNuts - jtk1234 - Bronco Billy - YouMightDieTryin - hockeyBjj - honcho55 - murphysxm - Patsfan86 - jman3134
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Agree with this. I think of this every time a team is accused of running up the score, or not taking out the starters when up big. I think Belichick and the early 2000s Rams were accused of this many times.
Not all that counts can be counted. Not all that can be counted counts.
Re: Week 9 Discussion
That was just one of several big calls down the stretch.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:34 pmIt 100% did cost them the gameThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:15 pmThat garbage taunting call almost cost CHI the game too. Painful to see a call like that called in such a critical moment
Sometimes calls are so one sided it looks like someone paid off the ref.
That hip checking ref needs to be suspended, investigated, and possibly removed from the game.
I had no skin in the game but at least 3 phantom calls and one cost a TD.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Week 9 QB1s (including MNF)
1 Herbert
2 Jackson
3 Ryan
4 J Johnson
5 Wentz
6 Bridgewater
7 Cousins
8 Garoppolo
9 Prescott
10 Fields
11 Mayfield
12 Hurts
1 Herbert
2 Jackson
3 Ryan
4 J Johnson
5 Wentz
6 Bridgewater
7 Cousins
8 Garoppolo
9 Prescott
10 Fields
11 Mayfield
12 Hurts
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Week 9 TE1s (including MNF)
1 Freiermuth
2 Kittle
3 Kelce
4 Waller
5 Kmet
6 S Anderson
7 Parham (Tie) Swaim
9 Engram (Tie) Griffin
11 Cook*
12 Higbee
* depending on whether your league counts 2 point conversion receptions - otherwise replaced by Arnold
1 Freiermuth
2 Kittle
3 Kelce
4 Waller
5 Kmet
6 S Anderson
7 Parham (Tie) Swaim
9 Engram (Tie) Griffin
11 Cook*
12 Higbee
* depending on whether your league counts 2 point conversion receptions - otherwise replaced by Arnold
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Week 9 RB1s (including MNF)
1 Conner
2 Taylor
3 Chubb
4 Mixon
5 Hines
6 Kamara
7 Patterson
8 Gordon
9 Harris
10 Freeman
11 Drake
12 Gaskin
1 Conner
2 Taylor
3 Chubb
4 Mixon
5 Hines
6 Kamara
7 Patterson
8 Gordon
9 Harris
10 Freeman
11 Drake
12 Gaskin
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Week 9 WR1s (including MNF)
1 E Moore
2 D Smith
3 Allen
4 Zaccheaus
5 M Brown
6 Mooney
7 Kupp
8 M Turner
9 Aiyuk
10 T Patrick
11 Renfrow
12 Pittman (Tie) Woods
1 E Moore
2 D Smith
3 Allen
4 Zaccheaus
5 M Brown
6 Mooney
7 Kupp
8 M Turner
9 Aiyuk
10 T Patrick
11 Renfrow
12 Pittman (Tie) Woods
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..
Re: Week 9 Discussion
You just want to ignore the fact it extended a drive which resulted in a Pitt FG, in a game the Bears lost by 2?ThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:13 pmeh, they managed to get the lead.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:34 pmIt 100% did cost them the gameThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:15 pm
That garbage taunting call almost cost CHI the game too. Painful to see a call like that called in such a critical moment
Would it have helped to have some extra time? ya for sure. But they scored with too much time left, and they shot themselves in the foot on defense and allowed PIT to take the lead back.
I can't blame that on one call
Re: Week 9 Discussion
Just when they finally got CELEBRATING big plays and TDs right, they go overboard on this taunting crap. As usual, NFL overcorrecting like every big business.
There's far too much posturing with crap like this - like someone already said, who the hell's getting "offended" when a player makes a great play and briefly stares down a defender? Who gives a crap?
It's one thing to flamboyantly or aggressively show someone up for a long period of time - which I think is what was or should be INTENDED with this rule - it's quite another with these minor "transgressions."
Falls in the bucket of you could throw a flag on every play to me. Yeah, let's flag every stare-down, swear word, and gesture too? Let's make the game suck more! Protect the children!! ...from what, exactly? Minor adversity in a... competitive sport?
It's hilariously stupid. LET THEM PLAY!
There's far too much posturing with crap like this - like someone already said, who the hell's getting "offended" when a player makes a great play and briefly stares down a defender? Who gives a crap?
It's one thing to flamboyantly or aggressively show someone up for a long period of time - which I think is what was or should be INTENDED with this rule - it's quite another with these minor "transgressions."
Falls in the bucket of you could throw a flag on every play to me. Yeah, let's flag every stare-down, swear word, and gesture too? Let's make the game suck more! Protect the children!! ...from what, exactly? Minor adversity in a... competitive sport?
It's hilariously stupid. LET THEM PLAY!
35 Team Dyn PPR, 3 x Copy SF start 2TE Super Prem (TE 2 PPR, 8pt TD), 6 pt/non-TE TD, 1pt/20 yds pass (300 +3pt), 1pt/10 yds rush/rec (100 +3pt)
Start 12: 1QB 1SFLX 2RB 4WR 2TE 2FLX | 30 Active Roster, unlim Taxi, 3 IR/Out (+) | est. '21 | playoffs '21, '22
QB - J Allen, T Lawrence ...
RB - A Ekeler, S Barkley, J Cook, I Pacheco ...
WR - AJ Brown, C Ridley, G Pickens, C Sutton ...
TE - D Njoku, D Knox ...
® 2024 - | 2025 -
Start 12: 1QB 1SFLX 2RB 4WR 2TE 2FLX | 30 Active Roster, unlim Taxi, 3 IR/Out (+) | est. '21 | playoffs '21, '22
QB - J Allen, T Lawrence ...
RB - A Ekeler, S Barkley, J Cook, I Pacheco ...
WR - AJ Brown, C Ridley, G Pickens, C Sutton ...
TE - D Njoku, D Knox ...
® 2024 - | 2025 -
-
- Starter
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:37 am
Re: Week 9 Discussion
This happens every week, every month, every season. Refs make bad calls. And objectively, a bad call in the 1st quarter of a game is no more or less impactful than a bad call at the end of a game. We are just biased to believe it means more because we are closer to knowing the games final result. Ask any fan and they'll tell you the refs hate their team more than all the rest. End of the day, if you allow a bad call by the ref to decide the game, you didn't do enough to secure the victory in the first place. I'm sure that's what (good) coaches are telling their locker rooms as well.95dent wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 9:41 amYou just want to ignore the fact it extended a drive which resulted in a Pitt FG, in a game the Bears lost by 2?ThunderTung wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:13 pmeh, they managed to get the lead.
Would it have helped to have some extra time? ya for sure. But they scored with too much time left, and they shot themselves in the foot on defense and allowed PIT to take the lead back.
I can't blame that on one call