I just don't know what Gibson has done to be worth a future first. I agree his value has improved, but it's not like he's this fantastic prospect either. He has 33 career carries in college.Brinmonkey wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:54 pm Think about it by reversing it - anybody else find you cannot even trade three future 2nds for a current year say mid 1st. These people who are against Gibson probably don't own him anywhere, and those who do own and like him feel that his selection in the mid 2nd range was a huge value. His value has objectively grown since pre draft due to aforementioned (66th draft selection, Guice departure, 1st team reps) so these people who own him tend to view him now in the mid-later 1st. The only reason you would take a future 1st for Gibson is because you're gambling that the pick is high, higher than a mid-late 1st or wherever you value him now. You still miss out on him as a prospect and his full year of development. Gibson owners should hold if they believe and buyers will not be able to get him for anything less than a 2021 1st that is projected higher.
Feels like the hope is that he's another Kamara type of "how was he underused in college and now he's this good as an NFL rookie?"