Acquiring Andrews

[bmac1481]

For team 4 in signature. Owner of Mark Andrews has offered 3 different options to me.
1. Metcalf
2. My 2020 1.07 and 3.07
3. Chark and 2020 3.04

Some of his notable players are Mostert, Sanders, Kirk, A. Miller, D. Parker, 1.03,2. 03,2.10,3.03.

I feel I'm a RB short of a really strong team, obviously could use an upgrade at TE.
Thoughts?

[Gator Sens]

#2 for me depending on who is available once otc. If Jeudy or Lamb fall, I would do #3.

[jwb32]

You are not competing with only Cook at RB so I would hold here. In fact, I’d probably look to move Cook and focus on trying to compete next year.

[FantasyFoosball]

#3 is a snap accept. Andrews > Chark. Even #2 is a good deal for Andrews, but #3 is better. I would not be considering #1.

[Needalife]

I would do any of the 3. I value Andrews higher than all three. I’d rank them best as #2, then #3, then Metcalf deal.

[whodatbama]

Deal #3

[smbkrypt24]

I would take deal #3. I like Jeudy/Lamb over Chark which is who I expect to be at 1.07.

[jjleurquin]

If none of the big 5 RBs are left at your pick I go #2. If one is left I pick the RB and trade Metcalf. Metcalf and Chark should be in the same value area for anyone, and you'd be adding someone like Duvernay Claypool or Hamler here.

I don't agree with above poster that Jeudy/Lamb is better than Chark. Surer WRs have busted, Chark has already proven he can play at this level.

[CL3VELANDBR0WNS]

Think you are getting ripped off in all 3. I wouldn't be looking to swing a deal with a tight end as the main piece in a standard league.

[iceman68]

#3 for sure accept. I’m not sold on Chark. Was he a 1 year wonder as a 2nd year player? Cash in on him. Andrews is better.
#2 would be ok if you can wait until 1.07 is on the clock, to see who is available - Akers, Jeudy, or Lamb.