Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Joe Burrow has a vote for 8 in SF... lol
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2705
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:07 pm
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Has to be an error... they had to have meant for 1QB... right? Even then it is a little early, but not as egregious as 1.08 in SF.
Gopher Two
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
If it is in fact an error, then I can switch it over to 1 QB. That's why I have people submit an I'd, so I can make changes if necessary. If the person that made that submission reads this, shoot me a message and I'll update it.Shcritters wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 2:57 pmHas to be an error... they had to have meant for 1QB... right? Even then it is a little early, but not as egregious as 1.08 in SF.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Seems unlikely to matter anyway. Burrow is going to run away with the #1 spot in that vote whether that vote is included or not.cmizelle wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 3:46 pmIf it is in fact an error, then I can switch it over to 1 QB. That's why I have people submit an I'd, so I can make changes if necessary. If the person that made that submission reads this, shoot me a message and I'll update it.Shcritters wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 2:57 pmHas to be an error... they had to have meant for 1QB... right? Even then it is a little early, but not as egregious as 1.08 in SF.
12 Team FFPC TE Premium
QB: Herbert, Brady
RB: Barkley, Mixon, Jav Williams, Pierce, Drake
WR: Jefferson, AJ Brown, Metcalf, Hopkins, Peoples-Jones
TE: Kittle, Goedert
QB: Herbert, Brady
RB: Barkley, Mixon, Jav Williams, Pierce, Drake
WR: Jefferson, AJ Brown, Metcalf, Hopkins, Peoples-Jones
TE: Kittle, Goedert
-
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:58 pm
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
A failed attempt at lowering Burrows value?Vcize wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:57 pmSeems unlikely to matter anyway. Burrow is going to run away with the #1 spot in that vote whether that vote is included or not.cmizelle wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 3:46 pmIf it is in fact an error, then I can switch it over to 1 QB. That's why I have people submit an I'd, so I can make changes if necessary. If the person that made that submission reads this, shoot me a message and I'll update it.Shcritters wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 2:57 pm
Has to be an error... they had to have meant for 1QB... right? Even then it is a little early, but not as egregious as 1.08 in SF.
Surely a slip up and like you said, won't really change anything.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
They also voted Tua over him, Tua's lowest grade (at time of my post anyway) was 7th.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
I'm not sure how you determined that the same person submitted Burrow at 8 and Tua over him, but you are correct. Here are the details of that submission. Its not typical for 2QB, but nothing too crazy...bjd5211 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:59 pm They also voted Tua over him, Tua's lowest grade (at time of my post anyway) was 7th.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Because no one had voted Tua lower than 7th, while Burrow had one vote for 8th and they both had been voted on in every entry. So whoever voted for Burrow at 8 couldn't have voted for Tua at 8 or lower.cmizelle wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 amI'm not sure how you determined that the same person submitted Burrow at 8 and Tua over him, but you are correct. Here are the details of that submission. Its not typical for 2QB, but nothing too crazy...bjd5211 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:59 pm They also voted Tua over him, Tua's lowest grade (at time of my post anyway) was 7th.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
Ultimately doesn't matter, was just making an observation.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Gotcha...You're following it more closely than I ambjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:53 am Because no one had voted Tua lower than 7th, while Burrow had one vote for 8th and they both had been voted on in every entry. So whoever voted for Burrow at 8 couldn't have voted for Tua at 8 or lower.
Ultimately doesn't matter, was just making an observation.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Those look to be my rankings. Wish i had some sexy argument, but I don't.cmizelle wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 amI'm not sure how you determined that the same person submitted Burrow at 8 and Tua over him, but you are correct. Here are the details of that submission. Its not typical for 2QB, but nothing too crazy...bjd5211 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:59 pm They also voted Tua over him, Tua's lowest grade (at time of my post anyway) was 7th.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
Just not sold on Burrow, the Bengals organization/ownership, or the current head coach/offensive scheme.
My submitted rankings are prospect rankings in that I didn't consider re-sale or trade value as though we were actually drafting. Clearly I'd be able to trade a shot at Burrow (or Burrow himself) for what I consider to be a massive profit...and I would. I'm not naive to the marketplace or consensus -- but i didn't think that Burrow getting 50 #1 votes was the point of the exercise.
Sorry if my rankings messed up the tool. I love it and I'm very appreciative of it, and of you for managing it every off-season.
I didn't have any ill intent.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
No apology needed, it's all good.DynoScout wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 7:43 pm
Sorry if my rankings messed up the tool. I love it and I'm very appreciative of it, and of you for managing it every off-season.
I didn't have any ill intent.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
The tool would actually be kind of worthless if people didn't put in the rankings they believe in and just followed what everybody else does instead. In real world drafts even in SF, Burrow will not get taken #1 in every draft out there. There are always people that have rankings drastically different from consensus and sometimes multiple of those people get in the same league. Don't apologize for helping make the tool more accurate to the reality of how drafts actually happen.DynoScout wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 7:43 pmThose look to be my rankings. Wish i had some sexy argument, but I don't.cmizelle wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 amI'm not sure how you determined that the same person submitted Burrow at 8 and Tua over him, but you are correct. Here are the details of that submission. Its not typical for 2QB, but nothing too crazy...bjd5211 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:59 pm They also voted Tua over him, Tua's lowest grade (at time of my post anyway) was 7th.
It's true it won't really matter, but why participate if you're going to put in crap like that? Even any Burrow haters/skeptics would take him long before that just for resell value.
Just not sold on Burrow, the Bengals organization/ownership, or the current head coach/offensive scheme.
My submitted rankings are prospect rankings in that I didn't consider re-sale or trade value as though we were actually drafting. Clearly I'd be able to trade a shot at Burrow (or Burrow himself) for what I consider to be a massive profit...and I would. I'm not naive to the marketplace or consensus -- but i didn't think that Burrow getting 50 #1 votes was the point of the exercise.
Sorry if my rankings messed up the tool. I love it and I'm very appreciative of it, and of you for managing it every off-season.
I didn't have any ill intent.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
I second this... you just expressed it much better than I could have!CubfanAA wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 2:17 pm The tool would actually be kind of worthless if people didn't put in the rankings they believe in and just followed what everybody else does instead. In real world drafts even in SF, Burrow will not get taken #1 in every draft out there. There are always people that have rankings drastically different from consensus and sometimes multiple of those people get in the same league. Don't apologize for helping make the tool more accurate to the reality of how drafts actually happen.
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
I had Deez Nutz @ 1.01 but then again I also voted for him as Prez in '16
Re: Mizelle Rookie Rankings Page
Bump... just wanted to bump this thread up in case there were people that wanted to submit their rankings and hadn't seen it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Bronco Billy and 65 guests