WR Trio + 2nd or Chubb

[johnnymozart]

Kupp, Terry McLaurin, DParker, 2021 2nd
for Chubb

Thoughts on this? I don't need WR much but this would set me up for long time in that dept.

[tperry14]

Having to start two running backs and only being able to start 3 WRs I do not think I would do this deal unless you are confident you'd be able to trade for other running backs. The 2.01 could produce a good potential WR in this class already so I wouldn't deplete the RBs on your team just to have and army of WRs when you can only start 3

[Gator Sens]

Pretty solid value for Chubb overall, but I'm not sure it's the best move for your team.

[FantasyFoosball]

Chubb for me.

[BigBawseRoss]

chubb. having a more difficult wr3 decision each week should not be your focus.

[Tripwired]

You've got to be able to replace Chubb. You don't have the rb depth to move him for a bunch of WRs. It's not an SF league so the 2nd rounder will likely be depleted of any starting RBS. I think it'd pass unless he upgrades the pick or includes an option for you to at least try and replace chubb.

[Jcedwards]

Not a bad offer by any means, but I'd keep Chubb here. You don't need those 3 WRs as much as you need Chubb. Losing Chubb really hurts you at RB and you don't have a high pick in this draft to replace Chubb.

Unless you know you can trade one of your WRs for a RB of equal or better value than Chubb, I'd holding Chubb here.

[SaQuads_9]

I agree with most of the others.... It isnt bad value for chubb but based on your build this hurts your team more than it helps.

[Goddard]

I like the value. You have plenty of time to figure out how you're going to replace Chubb. That teams not competing anyways, so you might as well get multiple pieces to help the rebuild.

[Whittles12]

Same thing, for your team it hurts you more than it helps.