How could it NOT? He's a WR1 after all.
Same sort of sentences and value-tiers as Tyreek Hill and Davante Adams. Probably wouldn't trade him for them, though... those guys are bums.
Why, did something bad happen?
What I'm saying is that this game is an outlier (as was the game he had 220 yards the game before) This game should not affect how you view him as a player, regardless if you view him as a WR1 or not. I paid a late first for him, I don't really care whether people view him as a top 12 WR or not, TBH.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:05 pm I remember when Tyreek was called boom or bust last year for a similar trend in points scored...
Kupps best game of the year sandwiched between 3 stinkers. Just saying it's funny how all the supporters come in after a bad game and say it was just 1 game! But then after a good game, come in and re crown him.
Seems a little hypocritical but it's dynasty, so if you think he's a #1 WR cool. I'm not paying those prices
We never de-crowned him, though.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:05 pm I remember when Tyreek was called boom or bust last year for a similar trend in points scored...
Kupps best game of the year sandwiched between 3 stinkers. Just saying it's funny how all the supporters come in after a bad game and say it was just 1 game! But then after a good game, come in and re crown him.
Seems a little hypocritical but it's dynasty, so if you think he's a #1 WR cool. I'm not paying those prices
So tell me if we're in agreement...FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:08 pmWhat I'm saying is that this game is an outlier (as was the game he had 220 yards the game before) This game should not affect how you view him as a player, regardless if you view him as a WR1 or not. I paid a late first for him, I don't really care whether people view him as a top 12 WR or not, TBH.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:05 pm I remember when Tyreek was called boom or bust last year for a similar trend in points scored...
Kupps best game of the year sandwiched between 3 stinkers. Just saying it's funny how all the supporters come in after a bad game and say it was just 1 game! But then after a good game, come in and re crown him.
Seems a little hypocritical but it's dynasty, so if you think he's a #1 WR cool. I'm not paying those prices
I'd agree with that. There may be the odd owner that does trade him for less than 2 firsts, but that would not be common.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:20 pmSo tell me if we're in agreement...FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:08 pmWhat I'm saying is that this game is an outlier (as was the game he had 220 yards the game before) This game should not affect how you view him as a player, regardless if you view him as a WR1 or not. I paid a late first for him, I don't really care whether people view him as a top 12 WR or not, TBH.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:05 pm I remember when Tyreek was called boom or bust last year for a similar trend in points scored...
Kupps best game of the year sandwiched between 3 stinkers. Just saying it's funny how all the supporters come in after a bad game and say it was just 1 game! But then after a good game, come in and re crown him.
Seems a little hypocritical but it's dynasty, so if you think he's a #1 WR cool. I'm not paying those prices
These last 4 games are all outliers.
His value is worth more than a late 1st
No way any owner gives him up for less than 2-3 1sts
Cool so his value is somewhere between a mid WR1 and low end WR2FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:46 pmI'd agree with that. There may be the odd owner that does trade him for less than 2 firsts, but that would not be common.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:20 pmSo tell me if we're in agreement...FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:08 pm
What I'm saying is that this game is an outlier (as was the game he had 220 yards the game before) This game should not affect how you view him as a player, regardless if you view him as a WR1 or not. I paid a late first for him, I don't really care whether people view him as a top 12 WR or not, TBH.
These last 4 games are all outliers.
His value is worth more than a late 1st
No way any owner gives him up for less than 2-3 1sts
Yep.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:00 pmCool so his value is somewhere between a mid WR1 and low end WR2FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:46 pmI'd agree with that. There may be the odd owner that does trade him for less than 2 firsts, but that would not be common.
I think pass rush might have had something to do with it. That and the fact the Rams have a terrible OL, and not much of a running game. They were totally outmatched at the LOS today. Kupp has been productive since he entered the league. He's more than some extra WR who gets lost in the mix.fakespike13 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:22 am I can’t say this definitely but it seems that Pitt actually covered Kupp today with a talented DB rather than letting him run wild across the middle “covered” by zone LBers and shitty nickel backs. If defenses want to shut him down instead of Woods and Cooks it is apparently not that difficult. I think the LAR offense has been solved and thats not good news for Kupp. It’s laughable to put him in the same breath as Tyreek. Kupp feasts on being the forgotten WR in 3 wide sets. Hill is literally uncoverable.
Reading this back and forth makes me laugh.ckrumm24 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 9:45 pmWe are in kindergarten and the Teachers pass out snacks. Johnny has a cookie. Timmy has cake. Both Johnny and Timmy like each food to some degree but Johnny asks Timmy if he wants to trade and he accepts. Sure, Timmy COULD ask for a Nickle because he clearly knows Johnny wants that damn delicious chocolate forest cake, but he doesn’t because he likes the cookie more than the cake anyway. Even if he did counter, Johnny doesn’t need to accept with the sweetener and we are back to the original offer.territdown33 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:32 amI really don’t get how some don’t get very simple concepts. Put it this way;trc wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 1:17 am
Context really matters.
If the Adams owner is contender then Kupp will most likely be the better play this year out. It is not like Kupp is a 1-year rental.
But if the Adams owner doesn't like Kupp for some reason, then it will be a tough sell.
In general if you talk value in a vacuum, I agree - the approacher should add something. But it is never in vacuum, perhaps off season is.
If you are actively trying to sell your house on the market and reaching out to potential buyers and your offering up a similar value house (age, location etc) you generally need to add some sort of incentive/sweetener to close the deal. Your screaming to the other owner, I for whatever reason like/value your house more than mine and I want to trade.
On the other hand if you have a house and not actively shopping it (ie people are coming to you with offers) you should expect to get above market value for that house since that owner is not looking to move.
Thinking 1 for 1 positional trades for players of similar age/value actually work is part of the reason trading is so damm hard and frustrating with owners who share these beliefs.
Ps I just rejected an OBJ offer straight up for my Kupp.
He is Cooper Frigging Kupp and he is mad at the world today!perkinsrooster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:58 am It's so confusing, is he Steve Largent or Michael Clayton???
Users browsing this forum: BabyChark23, Bing [Bot], BlackOmega, Bronco Billy, Forza_Azzurri, Hottoddies, Jigga94, mild, Orenthal Shames and 138 guests