Postby djeternal2 » Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:45 am
territdown33 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:32 am
trc wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 1:17 am
territdown33 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:35 pm
I think if you are making offers for the same positional players of similar age ie Kupp for Adams then you should be adding something to your side of the deal (this goes both ways). If the Adams owner wants Kupp he should be offering Adams + and vise versa if the Kupp owner is trying to acquire Adams.
By offering these 1 for 1 offers you are saying I value your guy higher right? Or else why would you be offering it then in the first place?
I don’t see many 1 for 1 deals for players of the same position and same age in any of my leagues. At least not for starting caliber players.
Context really matters.
If the Adams owner is contender then Kupp will most likely be the better play this year out. It is not like Kupp is a 1-year rental.
But if the Adams owner doesn't like Kupp for some reason, then it will be a tough sell.
In general if you talk value in a vacuum, I agree - the approacher should add something. But it is never in vacuum, perhaps off season is.
I really don’t get how some don’t get very simple concepts. Put it this way;
If you are actively trying to sell your house on the market and reaching out to potential buyers and your offering up a similar value house (age, location etc) you generally need to add some sort of incentive/sweetener to close the deal. Your screaming to the other owner, I for whatever reason like/value your house more than mine and I want to trade.
On the other hand if you have a house and not actively shopping it (ie people are coming to you with offers) you should expect to get above market value for that house since that owner is not looking to move.
Thinking 1 for 1 positional trades for players of similar age/value actually work is part of the reason trading is so damm hard and frustrating with owners who share these beliefs.
I don't see how some people can't understand that other people have different opinions. Or can't read. Maybe both.
Also who in this day and age swaps houses? Is this a thing? Very odd way of trying to explain if someone comes to you offering Kupp for Adams or the reverse you want something on top. Not everyone feels this way. I've swapped players before without anything on top. I've also offered those trades up and they end up after discussions turning into larger trades. Just because you do something one way doesn't mean it's the only way.
10 tm ppr 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 2 Flex, TE, K, TDEF (Yr 6)
QB - Ryan, Wentz
RB - Gurley, A Jones, Cohen, Kerryon, Dam Williams, Duke, I Smith, Armstead, T Carson
WR - AJG, Watkins, ARob, A. Cooper, K Allen, M Williams, Godwin, Callaway, JJAW
TE - Gesicki, I Smith, Herndon, Eifert, Sternberger, Dissly
10 tm TE prem 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Flex, K, 2 DB, 2 DL, 2 LB (Yr 5)
QB - Mahomes, Mayfield, Wentz,
RB - Zeke, Chubb, Kerryon, Duke, Edmonds, B Hill
WR - Nuk, AJG, ARob, JJS, Samuel, MVS, T Smith, D Hamilton, Gallup, K Johnson
TE - Njoku, Eifert, Herndon, I Smith, I Thomas, Moreau
DL - Watt, K Clark, Q Williams
LB - D Jones, D Bush
DB - K Neal, Bell
DLF Early Birds - 16 tm SF (1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex, 1 SF
QB - A Rodgers, Darnold, Rosen, M Rudolph, Luck
RB - Damian Williams, J Howard, Duke, AP, Gore
WR - Julio, Golladay, Kirk, Stills, Manny Sanders, N Harry
TE - Jarwin, Gesicki, Boyle, Sprinkle