Let's talk... JuJu Smith-Schuster

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
remedy29
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1197
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 6:33 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby remedy29 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:51 am

Goddard wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:56 am Guys like Hopkins, AB, MT, Adams, and pretty every stud WR always lead the league in targets. And yet, no one says they're target dependent. Actually, people used to say that about Hopkins but have changed their tunes the last couple of years.
But they are target dependent, just like every other WR1. If they are not target dependent, then why did you leave out Tyler Lockett? He certainly had elite efficiency, elite yards per catch and 10 TDs. Sounds like an elite WR surpassed by no one, except he had low targets.

User avatar
Jfever
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6705
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Jfever » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:02 am

MontrealBen wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:46 am Just moved Hilton for Juju in a keeper league (keep 5/yr without penalty).

This reminds me *exactly* of Nuk's down year. Half of the people out there kept beating the "bet on talent" drum, while the other half said that his play with a shitty QB was proof that he wasn't ready to step out of Andre Johnson's shadow. I'll still bet on talent allll day.
This ^ :clap:
Truth is found through Evidence.

Science is the poetry of reality.

* Reality (as defined by Webster's dictionary) - A word for things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional ideal of them.

User avatar
thebeast
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5645
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:40 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby thebeast » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:09 am

Interesting this was his NFL scouting notes:

"Smith-Schuster will get dinged for his lack of speed and separation but he reminds me of Anquan Boldin with his strong hands, physical approach and ability to win the combat catches. JuJu is missing some of the speed traits teams want from their WR1, but he could become a high-volume, possession target with the size to win some 50/50 throws down the field. Teams who have a speed merchant at one spot would be wise to take a look at Smith-Schuster as a physical counterpart."

It sounds like exactly the situation he succeeded in last year and could point to trouble going forward. Juju is not Hopkins who had a single down year due to playing with what might actually be the worst QB in NFL history, but proved to be QB proof prior and after that stint with plenty of other replacement-level talent. Anyway, I don't a horse in this fight, I don't own him anywhere and I'm not looking to acquire at this point, but I think there is more here then "hey he'll be fine", I think owners are still in a good spot to get a return on him if they have any concerns.

User avatar
Goddard
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27771
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:21 am

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Goddard » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:12 am

remedy29 wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:51 am
Goddard wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:56 am Guys like Hopkins, AB, MT, Adams, and pretty every stud WR always lead the league in targets. And yet, no one says they're target dependent. Actually, people used to say that about Hopkins but have changed their tunes the last couple of years.
But they are target dependent, just like every other WR1. If they are not target dependent, then why did you leave out Tyler Lockett? He certainly had elite efficiency, elite yards per catch and 10 TDs. Sounds like an elite WR surpassed by no one, except he had low targets.
I agree they are...I think you're making the same point as I was trying to make. Every great WR is target dependent, but for some reason, when people don't like a WR, they use that as an excuse to lower his value. Like Keenan for number of years. Everyone kept saying he's target dependent and not a real stud. Well, yeah, all the studs are all target dependent.

SteveMaddensShoes
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5063
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby SteveMaddensShoes » Thu Oct 03, 2019 12:11 pm

Like an earlier poster said, so much noise. smh.

I wonder sometimes why I come here. I don't have the skill set to evaluate players well, i'll be the first to admit that. But just listening to this thread makes me think the same about most of us. So much production talk without anyone offering any opinion on if he is open? is he being missed on passes? is he running the wrong routes? the right routes? is he being manhandled? Can he not beat double coverage? I literally don't know the answers to this, but 5 pages later I haven't heard an answer to any of these questions. Just production, production, production. Yeah, production is going to be pretty awful with Rudolph in there for now. That's not surprising in the least.

I haven't been able to watch near as much football this year, so I'd love to hear from people who have watched the steelers and Juju a decent amount to find out if he is still playing well and just not getting the targets or is he not deserving of the targets?
TEAM 1 - 12 man SF. ppr, TEP 1.65 ppr

11 starters - QB, RB(2) WR(3) TE, SF, Flex(3)

Stroud, Kyler, Bryce Young, Anthony Richardson, Minshew, Trey Lance, Dalton l, Mike White

Breece, Achane, AJ Dillon, Justice Hill, Evan Hull, Chris Rodgriquez

Chase, Lamb, Waddle, Olave, London Drake, Demario Davis, Jake Bobo

Kyle Pitts, Mark Andrews, Kincaid, Schoonmaker

24 picks - 1x2, 3,4,5

Team 2-
12 man SF, .25ppc, .5ppr rbs, 1 ppr wr, 1.5 ppr TE

Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawerence, Jake Haehner, Jake Browning

JT, Kendre Miller,, K Ingram, Ty Chandler, Michael Carter, Kenny Macintosh, Sean Tucker

Puka, Rondale, Mooney, Wan’dale, Terrace Marshall, DPJ, Justyn Ross, Xavier Hutchinson,

Kyle Pitts, Luke Musgrave, Juwan Johnson, Darnell Washington, Jelani Woods, Elijah Higgins


24 - 1st x 3, 2nd x 2, 4th x 3 ,5

User avatar
Phaded
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 11964
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Phaded » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:13 pm

thebeast wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:09 am Interesting this was his NFL scouting notes:

"Smith-Schuster will get dinged for his lack of speed and separation but he reminds me of Anquan Boldin with his strong hands, physical approach and ability to win the combat catches. JuJu is missing some of the speed traits teams want from their WR1, but he could become a high-volume, possession target with the size to win some 50/50 throws down the field. Teams who have a speed merchant at one spot would be wise to take a look at Smith-Schuster as a physical counterpart."

It sounds like exactly the situation he succeeded in last year and could point to trouble going forward. Juju is not Hopkins who had a single down year due to playing with what might actually be the worst QB in NFL history, but proved to be QB proof prior and after that stint with plenty of other replacement-level talent. Anyway, I don't a horse in this fight, I don't own him anywhere and I'm not looking to acquire at this point, but I think there is more here then "hey he'll be fine", I think owners are still in a good spot to get a return on him if they have any concerns.
This scouting analysis is pretty spot on for who JuJu is as a receiver. It is not to say that there is anything bad about a possession receiver, they absolutely have their role to play in the NFL and can be highly productive if given the volume, however in my opinion they do not have the elite upside.

JuJu was the 4th most targeted receiver in the league this year, AB was the 3rd most targeted receiver in the league. A lot of the argument in favour of JuJu when AB left was a lot of people falsely assuming that JuJu would get even more targets with AB gone. Expecting an improvement on 166 targets is a foolish projection.

His target count is down for one simple reason, and it has nothing to do with Mason Rudolph. His target count is down because he is not getting open as frequently as he was last year.

JuJu is a fine, upcoming NFL receiver - but he is not an elite option. I get that everyone always wants to chase the next big young thing, but sometimes that young player just ends up being very good and not elite.

Again, those guys have their value and it's not like JuJu is worthless - but if you were one of those who took JuJu as a 1st round startup guy, you should be worried. JuJu screamed "overvalued" when you looked at his ADP, but it is largely due to the over-emphasis on age.

User avatar
moishetreats
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6561
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby moishetreats » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:22 pm

thebeast wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:09 am Interesting this was his NFL scouting notes:

"Smith-Schuster will get dinged for his lack of speed and separation but he reminds me of Anquan Boldin with his strong hands, physical approach and ability to win the combat catches. JuJu is missing some of the speed traits teams want from their WR1, but he could become a high-volume, possession target with the size to win some 50/50 throws down the field. Teams who have a speed merchant at one spot would be wise to take a look at Smith-Schuster as a physical counterpart."

It sounds like exactly the situation he succeeded in last year and could point to trouble going forward. Juju is not Hopkins who had a single down year due to playing with what might actually be the worst QB in NFL history, but proved to be QB proof prior and after that stint with plenty of other replacement-level talent. Anyway, I don't a horse in this fight, I don't own him anywhere and I'm not looking to acquire at this point, but I think there is more here then "hey he'll be fine", I think owners are still in a good spot to get a return on him if they have any concerns.

I'm not sure that scouting reports define a player's career. We have enough evidence in the NFL already that we can use that as a more accurate reflection of his strengths and limitations than a report from a few years ago. For instance:

Player X is an extremely productive receiver from a relatively smaller level football program that could use another year in college to continue to develop physically. He is undersized and will initially struggle with the physical aspects of the game at the next level. He generally has lined up out of the slot and would have trouble with his release against some of the physical cornerbacks at the next level if he lines up on the line of scrimmage. He is explosive off the line and will show a good burst out of his speed cuts but needs work on his hard cuts and underneath routes. He has decent hands but it looks like the ball gets big on him at times and he traps too many passes in his body.


Any guesses?

Yup, AB.
10 tms 27 plrs PPR
Start: 2QB 2RB 3WR 2TE 2Flex / best ball

QB: Herbert, Love, Rodgers, G Smith, Stidham, T Taylor, Hall
RB: McCaffrey, Mixon, Pacheco, Montgomery, Z White, Allgeier, Dillon
WR: Hill, St. Brown, Kupp, Allen, Lockett, B Johnson
TE: Kelce, Kmet, Kraft, Okonkwo, Dulcich, Tremble

2024: 2.09, 3.07, 3.08, 3.10, 4.08
2025: 2nd (x2), 4th, 5th (x2)
2026: 1st, 2nd (x2), 3rd, 4th, 5th



12 tms 22 active plyrs. Salary Cap $300 PPR
Start: 1QB 2RB 3WR 1TE 1SF 1Flex / best ball

QB: Lawrence (contract through 2026), Love ('24), Rodgers ('24), Stidham ('25), Lock ('25)
RB: Bijan Robinson ('25), Pollard ('27), Dillon ('24), Rodriguez ('24), Spiller ('24)
WR: G Wilson ('26), AJ Brown ('26), DJ Montgomery ('25)
TE: --
2024 Cap Spent: $186

IR: --
TAXI SQUAD (4 max): --

User avatar
Goddard
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27771
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:21 am

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Goddard » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:28 pm

Phaded wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:13 pm
His target count is down for one simple reason, and it has nothing to do with Mason Rudolph. His target count is down because he is not getting open as frequently as he was last year.
This just isn't true. In the two games Rudolph started, he's attempted 27 and 28 passes. Ben averaged over 40 pass attempts per game last year. And if anyone watched that game against Cincinnati, they'll tell you that the majority of those passes were dump offs to RBs. So if you don't think the lack of targets were because of Rudolph and the game plan and it's because Juju isn't getting open, there's no point in even having this discussion/argument.

Also, no ones mentioned his toe injury during the first game, which he apparently aggravated on Monday, as a cause to why he may be struggling some.

Sriracha
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3698
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Sriracha » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:38 pm

Goddard wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:28 pm
Phaded wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:13 pm
His target count is down for one simple reason, and it has nothing to do with Mason Rudolph. His target count is down because he is not getting open as frequently as he was last year.
This just isn't true. In the two games Rudolph started, he's attempted 27 and 28 passes. Ben averaged over 40 pass attempts per game last year. And if anyone watched that game against Cincinnati, they'll tell you that the majority of those passes were dump offs to RBs. So if you don't think the lack of targets were because of Rudolph and the game plan and it's because Juju isn't getting open, there's no point in even having this discussion/argument.

Also, no ones mentioned his toe injury during the first game, which he apparently aggravated on Monday, as a cause to why he may be struggling some.
While that conservative gameplan worked last week, they won't be playing the Bengals every week.

Sooner or later they're going to have to uncork Rudolph, and if at that point Juju is healthy and he still can't produce I'll begin to worry about his ability to be a true #1 in the NFL.

Until then... I see this as a huge overreaction. I honestly can't remember a single elite WR2 that couldn't cut it as a #1. Anyone got a precedence for this "elite Wr2 but can't cut it as a #1" narrative being spun here?

grandmabetty
Captain
Captain
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 1:26 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby grandmabetty » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:46 pm

in case anyone was wondering I'm going to bench him in one league and start him in another. :D

User avatar
Phaded
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 11964
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Phaded » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:50 pm

Goddard wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:28 pm
Phaded wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:13 pm
His target count is down for one simple reason, and it has nothing to do with Mason Rudolph. His target count is down because he is not getting open as frequently as he was last year.
This just isn't true. In the two games Rudolph started, he's attempted 27 and 28 passes. Ben averaged over 40 pass attempts per game last year. And if anyone watched that game against Cincinnati, they'll tell you that the majority of those passes were dump offs to RBs. So if you don't think the lack of targets were because of Rudolph and the game plan and it's because Juju isn't getting open, there's no point in even having this discussion/argument.
And Roethlisberger threw it 47 times in week one and JuJu "only" had 8 targets.
In games last year where Big Ben threw 47+ times, JuJu had 19, 11, 9, 10, 17 & 15 targets.

Now - the team is passing less because they do not have the best receiver in the game on their roster any more. They had two of the four most targeted receivers, that in itself is absurd. Sure, they have to gameplan for Rudolph being in but overlooking the AB factor is a big mistake as well.
Last edited by Phaded on Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Goddard
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27771
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:21 am

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Goddard » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:50 pm

IZigUZag wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:38 pm
Goddard wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:28 pm
Phaded wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:13 pm
His target count is down for one simple reason, and it has nothing to do with Mason Rudolph. His target count is down because he is not getting open as frequently as he was last year.
This just isn't true. In the two games Rudolph started, he's attempted 27 and 28 passes. Ben averaged over 40 pass attempts per game last year. And if anyone watched that game against Cincinnati, they'll tell you that the majority of those passes were dump offs to RBs. So if you don't think the lack of targets were because of Rudolph and the game plan and it's because Juju isn't getting open, there's no point in even having this discussion/argument.

Also, no ones mentioned his toe injury during the first game, which he apparently aggravated on Monday, as a cause to why he may be struggling some.
While that conservative gameplan worked last week, they won't be playing the Bengals every week.

Sooner or later they're going to have to uncork Rudolph, and if at that point Juju is healthy and he still can't produce I'll begin to worry about his ability to be a true #1 in the NFL.

Until then... I see this as a huge overreaction. I honestly can't remember a single elite WR2 that couldn't cut it as a #1. Anyone got a precedence for this "elite Wr2 but can't cut it as a #1" narrative being spun here?
I've been asking this same question, but I don't think anyone's come up with one yet.

User avatar
Phaded
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 11964
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Phaded » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:53 pm

On the flipside, go ahead and list the elite WR2s that did end up being an elite WR1?
I don't think that in itself is a long list either.

As recently as September, JuJu was being drafted as the #6 overall asset and the #2 overall WR.
Again, those are the people that need to be worried.

Under The Bridge
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:53 am

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Under The Bridge » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:01 pm

grandmabetty wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:50 am Its time for me. JuJu is on my bench in at least one of my leagues and will likely stay there. At this rate I doubt he makes it to 80 catches this year. Just sad
Bench him for Larry Fitzgerald. I love me some Fitz in PPR.

But with that said, this is yet another classic example of why I really dislike full PPR. 0.5 is much better, and 0.33 or 0.25 is ideal.

Sriracha
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3698
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Benching JuJu

Postby Sriracha » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:04 pm

Phaded wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:53 pm On the flipside, go ahead and list the elite WR2s that did end up being an elite WR1?
I don't think that in itself is a long list either.

As recently as September, JuJu was being drafted as the #6 overall asset and the #2 overall WR.
Again, those are the people that need to be worried.
Deandre Hopkins, Michael Thomas, Davante Adams, Julio Jones... the list is long friend


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], BabyChark23, killer_of_giants, TheTroll and 31 guests