New Studs

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
Shankopotamus
Starter
Starter
Posts: 675
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:40 am

New Studs

Postby Shankopotamus » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:59 pm

Rookies and 2nd year players. When do you feel comfortable saying that you have a new stud in the NFL?

I feel like Hollywood and Mandrews are going to be in that conversation at year's end. Perhaps even Preston Williams if he shores up those drops.

Obviously there has been a lot of production early for some of the Young guns, but when do you label them as your studs?
12 Team Super-Flex TEP Dynasty
22 CHAMP :dance:
(2019 & 2020 Runner-Up) :wall:


1 QB, 3 RB, 4 WR, Flex, SF, 2 TE

3 DL, 3 LB, 3 DB, 1 Flex IDP


QB- Justin Herbert, Baker Mayfield, Deshaun Watson, Marcus Mariota, Gardner Minshew, Sam Ehlinger
RB- D’Andre Swift, Nick Chubb, Javonte Williams, Cam Akers, Kyren Williams, Jerome Ford, D’Ernest Johnson, Darrell Henderson
WR- DK Metcalf, DJ Moore, Chris Godwin, Jameson Williams, Gabe Davis, Hollywood Brown, Josh Reynolds, Calvin Austin, Laviska Shenault, Kyle Phillips
TE-Mark Andrews, Greg Dulcich, Isaiah Likely, Donald Parham, Tyler Conklin
DL-Danielle Hunter, Nick Bosa, Deforest Buckner, Jonathon Allen
LB- Micah Parsons, Jack Sanborn, Logan Wilson, Cole Holcomb, Nakobe Dean, Brian Asamoah
DB-Jeremy Chinn, Jalen Pitre, Jalen Thompson, Kam Curl, Darrick Forrest
K-Tyler Bass

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27198
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: New Studs

Postby FantasyFreak » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:03 pm

None of the players mentioned are there yet. They need to produce top 12 numbers for at least a full year, for me.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick

Mike from Canada
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1720
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:16 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby Mike from Canada » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:35 pm

Barkley. Youngest stud wr I can think of is juju. Youngest RB stud is Barkley. There aren't many studs. That's why they're studs.

bjd5211
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5615
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: New Studs

Postby bjd5211 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:45 pm

Barkley is the only "stud" from the last 2 drafts to this point, some might argue Chubb but I wouldn't put him there yet. Lamar Jackson is really close too, but still needs to prove consistency.

If we go back 3 drafts add these guys to the list:

Mahomes
Watson

Kamara
CMC

Juju

4 years:

Wentz (borderline)

Zeke

MT
Hill

slaughterrt
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4537
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:11 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby slaughterrt » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:58 pm

Yeah, in my opinion a stud normally has to be top 10ish for at least two years...although I would consider Saquan a stud already. No one else, on offense at least, has really solidified themselves in the stud conversation yet. 2018 and 2019 have some potential studs, but most of those guys could wind up as average-to-above-average guys:

A couple guys I think could potentially be studs, but are still a ways off:
Nick Chubb
DK Metcalf
Preston Williams

There’s also plenty of potential IDP studs as well that I’m not naming.

bjd5211
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5615
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: New Studs

Postby bjd5211 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:10 pm

slaughterrt wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:58 pm Yeah, in my opinion a stud normally has to be top 10ish for at least two years...although I would consider Saquan a stud already. No one else, on offense at least, has really solidified themselves in the stud conversation yet. 2018 and 2019 have some potential studs, but most of those guys could wind up as average-to-above-average guys:

A couple guys I think could potentially be studs, but are still a ways off:
Nick Chubb
DK Metcalf
Preston Williams

There’s also plenty of potential IDP studs as well that I’m not naming.
I'd pump the brakes a bit on DK and Preston so far, Hollywood is pretty far ahead of them and he's still got a ways to go to be declared a stud.

Josh Jacobs is probably the closest out of this class so far, but I don't think he ever hits the true elite category that Saquon/Zeke/CMC/Kamara/Gurley/Bell currently or recently reside in. He probably tops out as a Melvin Gordon level guy, which is obviously still excellent but just a little below the top guys. Still a ways to go, but he looks promising so far.

Edit: Correction, TJ Hockenson is probably actually the closest to "Stud Status" in this class. Based on Dynasty value I would say he's kind of already there, he's easily a top 10 TE asset and close to top 5. Personally I would value him as the #4 TE in Dynasty already.

blemly
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1087
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:09 am

Re: New Studs

Postby blemly » Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:45 pm

bjd5211 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:10 pm
slaughterrt wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:58 pm Yeah, in my opinion a stud normally has to be top 10ish for at least two years...although I would consider Saquan a stud already. No one else, on offense at least, has really solidified themselves in the stud conversation yet. 2018 and 2019 have some potential studs, but most of those guys could wind up as average-to-above-average guys:

A couple guys I think could potentially be studs, but are still a ways off:
Nick Chubb
DK Metcalf
Preston Williams

There’s also plenty of potential IDP studs as well that I’m not naming.
I'd pump the brakes a bit on DK and Preston so far, Hollywood is pretty far ahead of them and he's still got a ways to go to be declared a stud.

Josh Jacobs is probably the closest out of this class so far, but I don't think he ever hits the true elite category that Saquon/Zeke/CMC/Kamara/Gurley/Bell currently or recently reside in. He probably tops out as a Melvin Gordon level guy, which is obviously still excellent but just a little below the top guys. Still a ways to go, but he looks promising so far.

Edit: Correction, TJ Hockenson is probably actually the closest to "Stud Status" in this class. Based on Dynasty value I would say he's kind of already there, he's easily a top 10 TE asset and close to top 5. Personally I would value him as the #4 TE in Dynasty already.
Disagree on stud status for TJ at this point, although I agree he’s one of the most likely from this class to eventually become one.
Team 1: 12-team SF 0.5 PPR:
QB: Dak, Russ, Stafford, Geno, Dalton
RB: Harris, Gibson, Chubb, Cohen
WR: DK, Ridley, Kirk, Chark, Woods, C Samuel, Shepard, Reagor
TE: Fant, Knox
Team 2: 14-team PPR SF TEP:
QB: Wilson, Burrow, Geno, Foles
RB: Mixon, Gibson, Hines, Cohen, Pollard
WR: DJM, Cooper, Sutton, Deebo, R. Moore, ARSB, Eskridge, Renfrow
TE: Gesicki, Njoku, Arnold
Team 3: 12-team PPR SF:
QB: Watson, Lawrence, Winston, Cam
RB: Harris, Ekeler, Dobbins
WR: Hill, AJB, Woods, Chark, Lockett
TE: Gesicki, OJH, Firkser
Team 4: 12-team SF TEP Devy
QB: Wilson, Geno, Ryan, Cousins
RB: Zeke, Chubb, Sanders, Pollard, Hines, Cohen, Henderson
WR: Cooper, Godwin, Sutton, JuJu, Samuel, Fuller, Shepard, Campbell
TE: Fant, Gesicki, Ertz, Freiermuth
Devy: Boutte, Young, Slovis, Harris
Team 5: 12-team PPR SF:
QB: Dak, Lance, Jones, Cam
RB: Swift, Sanders, Dobbins, Pollard
WR: Sutton, DJM, Golladay, Chase, Pittman, Kirk, Campbell, Mims, Wallace
TE: Herndon, Gesicki, Freiermuth

bjd5211
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5615
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: New Studs

Postby bjd5211 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:54 pm

I said closest to stud status, not that he's attained it yet. Value and production aren't always aligned, so when I say I value him as the #4 TE in Dynasty, doesn't mean I think he finishes as the #4 TE in scoring this year.
Last edited by bjd5211 on Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PR0v3
Captain
Captain
Posts: 781
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 2:58 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby PR0v3 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:55 pm

perkinsrooster wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:35 pm Barkley. Youngest stud wr I can think of is juju. Youngest RB stud is Barkley. There aren't many studs. That's why they're studs.
Yea, it does not seem there are many young studs at all. The league is definitely in a transition period where guys we have seen for the past 10-20 years are phasing out, but also hanging on remarkably well.

It looks like we may be seeing the NFL tables turned as the Giants, Packers, Steelers, Patriots, Chargers, Broncos, Saints head down the gutter while the Browns, Chiefs, Texans, Ravens, 49ers etc. rise up.
12 Team .5 PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/RB 20 man rosters, 5 man taxi est. 2018
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x

User avatar
Blueboy
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1887
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby Blueboy » Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:53 pm

From this class, the surest bets appear to be Hollywood and TJ Hockensen.

12-team SF, PPR, TE premium, 0.25 PPCarry
1QB 2RB 2WR 1TE 1SF 4Flex
QB: Mahomes, Fields, Love
RB: Bijan, ETN, Pollard, Achane, Herbert
WR: Kupp, Hill, Metcalf, Ridley, Jeudy, D.J. M, Burks, Hollywood, Wan'Dale
TE: Kyle Pitts, Goedert

User avatar
Hjorimir
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1383
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:03 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby Hjorimir » Fri Sep 27, 2019 10:42 pm

I feel like McLaurin is being a tad overlooked here. People touted wait for him to face the Bears and he still performed. He's on pace for 85 receptions, 1370 yards, and 16 TDs. Obviously, nobody should believe that will hold over the course of the season, but he's worth monitoring and his value is climbing quickly for good reason.
The Great Old Ones
10-team PPR (1-QB, 2-RB, 3-WR, 1-TE, 1-D/ST, 1-K)
QB: Dak, Tua, Mac, Mills (bleh)
RB: Gordon, Drake, Perine, RoJo II, Dillon, Coleman, Sermon, Ingram, Mitchell, Barber, JJ, Bolden
WR: Kupp, DJM, Chase, Jeudy, AJG, OBJ, Shepard, Mecole, Parris, Osborn
TE: Knox, Engram,
D/ST: NE
K: Zuerlein

The Blues Brothers
10-team PPR (1-QB, 1-RB, 2-WR, 1-TE, 2-RB/WR/TE, 3-IDP, 1-K)
QB: Dak, Herbert, Hurts, Bridgewater, Winston, Wentz, Heinicke
RB: Zeke, Cook, Mixon, Moss/Singletary, McKinnon, Gio, Rhamondre, Evans, Roundtree
WR: Kupp, Adams, Nuk, Evans, Ruggs III, Sammy, Guyton, Palmer
TE: Logan, Henry, Engram, Cook, Tremble
IDP: Demario, Bush, Mosley, Jewell, Poyer, Derwin, Vander Esch

User avatar
notweswelker
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 6:07 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby notweswelker » Sat Sep 28, 2019 1:29 am

bjd5211 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:10 pm

I'd pump the brakes a bit on DK and Preston so far, Hollywood is pretty far ahead of them and he's still got a ways to go to be declared a stud.
It's been 3 weeks. I know you've got Brown, but let's pump the brakes a little bit there. In the past decade there have been pretty much 0 stud WRs with his build and play style. Most likely you've got a Desean Jackson there, who was definitely a great wide receiver, but he wasn't a stud. The only stud WR to even remotely resemble his build was Antonio, and he had Big Ben throwing him the ball for a decade. Marquise has LJax, and that's not nearly as good. Both PW and DK project as more likely studs than a tiny field stretcher.

ColdZealDonkeyStrike
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2684
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:26 pm
Location: Nagoya, JP

Re: New Studs

Postby ColdZealDonkeyStrike » Sat Sep 28, 2019 3:36 am

Hjorimir wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 10:42 pm I feel like McLaurin is being a tad overlooked here. People touted wait for him to face the Bears and he still performed. He's on pace for 85 receptions, 1370 yards, and 16 TDs. Obviously, nobody should believe that will hold over the course of the season, but he's worth monitoring and his value is climbing quickly for good reason.
McLaurin has been really impressive. I don't know how anyone could not have him as a top 3 rookie WR at this point. He's my #1 From the class, and the best chance to become a stud WR for me. He has size and strength to beat press coverage, is a polished route runner, makes catches in traffic, and has 4.3 speed.
If we're talking about guys who have elevated themselves to stud status, Dalvin Cook would be my vote. I think he deserves to be valued like the big 4 RBs now.
Dynasty player since 2002.
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...

ColdZealDonkeyStrike
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2684
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:26 pm
Location: Nagoya, JP

Re: New Studs

Postby ColdZealDonkeyStrike » Sat Sep 28, 2019 3:43 am

notweswelker wrote: Sat Sep 28, 2019 1:29 am
bjd5211 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:10 pm

I'd pump the brakes a bit on DK and Preston so far, Hollywood is pretty far ahead of them and he's still got a ways to go to be declared a stud.
It's been 3 weeks. I know you've got Brown, but let's pump the brakes a little bit there. In the past decade there have been pretty much 0 stud WRs with his build and play style. Most likely you've got a Desean Jackson there, who was definitely a great wide receiver, but he wasn't a stud. The only stud WR to even remotely resemble his build was Antonio, and he had Big Ben throwing him the ball for a decade. Marquise has LJax, and that's not nearly as good. Both PW and DK project as more likely studs than a tiny field stretcher.
Why do so many people discredit other poster's motives on this board? It's super lame and makes me think the rest of your argument isn't worth reading.
Dynasty player since 2002.
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14254
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: New Studs

Postby Cameron Giles » Sat Sep 28, 2019 3:54 am

notweswelker wrote: Sat Sep 28, 2019 1:29 am
bjd5211 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:10 pm

I'd pump the brakes a bit on DK and Preston so far, Hollywood is pretty far ahead of them and he's still got a ways to go to be declared a stud.
It's been 3 weeks. I know you've got Brown, but let's pump the brakes a little bit there. In the past decade there have been pretty much 0 stud WRs with his build and play style. Most likely you've got a Desean Jackson there, who was definitely a great wide receiver, but he wasn't a stud. The only stud WR to even remotely resemble his build was Antonio, and he had Big Ben throwing him the ball for a decade. Marquise has LJax, and that's not nearly as good. Both PW and DK project as more likely studs than a tiny field stretcher.
Oh no, not this again.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 82 guests