The Tyreek Hill Thread

[notweswelker]

Mine looks slightly different:

1. JuJu (has many years left compared to the rest)
2. Michael Thomas (100% non diva in 2nd best system)
3. Hill (has the best qb, would be 1 if he wasn't a trash human)
4. Adams (100% non diva, new offense begs questions however)
5. Hopkins (Watson worries me more than A-Rod going forward)
6. Beckham (injury and diva concerns)

[TheNuts]

Hill
Hopkins
Beckham
Julio
Adams
Thomas

[BigBawseRoss]

Top tier of dynasty WRs now:

1. Hopkins
2. Hill
3. Beckham
4. Adams
5. Thomas
6. JuJu
7. Evans

Hill wouldn't be on my list. Regardless of the production he'll have, there's always a significant chance he has another incident. He's of no value to me.

thats how ive been treating him i got zero shares now and i just hope the ones i sold cheaply still end up looking like a good deal in the long run. i cant believe people act like this is the end of worry with hill. i dont want him and certainly not with a large investment via trade or early pick in a startup. LOL at hill number one you guys are goofy

[Jigga94]

Top tier of dynasty WRs now:

1. Hopkins
2. Hill
3. Beckham
4. Adams
5. Thomas
6. JuJu
7. Evans

Hill wouldn't be on my list. Regardless of the production he'll have, there's always a significant chance he has another incident. He's of no value to me.

Define no value

[Cameron Giles]

Top tier of dynasty WRs now:

1. Hopkins
2. Hill
3. Beckham
4. Adams
5. Thomas
6. JuJu
7. Evans

Hill wouldn't be on my list. Regardless of the production he'll have, there's always a significant chance he has another incident. He's of no value to me.

Define no value

I would not pay anything to get him, nor will I ever roster him.

[Jigga94]

Hill wouldn't be on my list. Regardless of the production he'll have, there's always a significant chance he has another incident. He's of no value to me.

Define no value

I would not pay anything to get him, nor will I ever roster him.

Not even a 3rd? Sounds smart

[Patsfan86]

I get why the Hill fanboys want to turn this into some massive win for him, but in reality its a massive loss. Guy could have had MT type money and years, instead he got far far far less. This was an extremely smart move by the chiefs. As a Hill hater i am happy. (Spare me the "He is still making 54 mil, thats much more than you will ever make garbage") Any person and NFL player wants to make as much money as possible, Hill knows what he missed out on, and thats being the highest paid WR in the league as well as losing many endorsement deals he would have had.

[Cameron Giles]

Define no value

I would not pay anything to get him, nor will I ever roster him.

Not even a 3rd? Sounds smart

I thought so too. I'll let others run in circles the next time Hill gets into trouble.

[notweswelker]

I would not pay anything to get him, nor will I ever roster him.

Not even a 3rd? Sounds smart

I thought so too. I'll let others run in circles the next time Hill gets into trouble.

He was a FA add for me in two leagues his rookie season. I wouldn't go out of my way to acquire him, but a lot of people (like me)
got him for free or near free. I think his odds of busting out are similar to Beckham's, who is also a freaking nut. Beckham also has missed ~50% of his games the past two seasons and is 1.5 years older. I'd easily be buying him over OBJ.

[Fish Sticks]

I get why the Hill fanboys want to turn this into some massive win for him, but in reality its a massive loss. Guy could have had MT type money and years, instead he got far far far less. This was an extremely smart move by the chiefs. As a Hill hater i am happy. (Spare me the "He is still making 54 mil, thats much more than you will ever make garbage") Any person and NFL player wants to make as much money as possible, Hill knows what he missed out on, and thats being the highest paid WR in the league as well as losing many endorsement deals he would have had.

I'll disagree here. The guy can still have MT money and more. If he continues to produce at a high level do you think he will settle for only 54 mil on another 3 year contract? By then the price for top WR will unquestionably be higher and he has the opportunity to sign for even more.. effectively giving him opportunity to make much more than had he simply signed a 5-6 year contract right now.

I know that that it's not completely apples to apples, but there is a reason that LeBron James signs one year contracts, he ends up making a ton more money doing that than locking in terms to a longer term deal.

[Goddard]

I get why the Hill fanboys want to turn this into some massive win for him, but in reality its a massive loss. Guy could have had MT type money and years, instead he got far far far less. This was an extremely smart move by the chiefs. As a Hill hater i am happy. (Spare me the "He is still making 54 mil, thats much more than you will ever make garbage") Any person and NFL player wants to make as much money as possible, Hill knows what he missed out on, and thats being the highest paid WR in the league as well as losing many endorsement deals he would have had.

Why would Hill owners care how much money he lost out on? All I know is, he got an extension, a pretty lucrative one for that matter, and the team is obviously committed to him. That's great news for my fantasy team. You can try to spin this in a negative way all you want, but if you don't think this extension was good for his dynasty value, then you must be new to the game.

[bjd5211]

I get why the Hill fanboys want to turn this into some massive win for him, but in reality its a massive loss. Guy could have had MT type money and years, instead he got far far far less. This was an extremely smart move by the chiefs. As a Hill hater i am happy. (Spare me the "He is still making 54 mil, thats much more than you will ever make garbage") Any person and NFL player wants to make as much money as possible, Hill knows what he missed out on, and thats being the highest paid WR in the league as well as losing many endorsement deals he would have had.

I'll disagree here. The guy can still have MT money and more. If he continues to produce at a high level do you think he will settle for only 54 mil on another 3 year contract? By then the price for top WR will unquestionably be higher and he has the opportunity to sign for even more.. effectively giving him opportunity to make much more than had he simply signed a 5-6 year contract right now.

I know that that it's not completely apples to apples, but there is a reason that LeBron James signs one year contracts, he ends up making a ton more money doing that than locking in terms to a longer term deal.

But he's not getting that money in the current years, which he would have had all this never happened. That's money that is never coming back.

[dynastyninja]

Hi, my name is dynastyninja, and I don't like Tyreek Hill

[ninotoreS]

I get why the Hill fanboys want to turn this into some massive win for him, but in reality its a massive loss.

The "Hill fanboys" here only care about his fantasy context, and in the fantasy context, Hill's dynasty owners just got him locked up for three more years with the league's best QB in the league's best offense.

As a Hill hater i am happy. (Spare me the "He is still making 54 mil, thats much more than you will ever make garbage")

[Jigga94]

I'd rather him make less money so they can give Mahomes even more.

BTW if anyone else wants to "sell high" I'm buying for any 1st