Rookie IDP

[haydn239]

Who has more upside in standard scoring IDP

Adrian Clayborn, DE, TB

or

Quan Sturdivant, LB, AZ

[MR ROURKE]

Standard scoring is a loaded question, since I'm not sure what standard is in the IDP world.

Sturduvant will have a nice career being the SILB and setting up WILB Washington probably to be the better FF LB.
Clayborn was one of the safer DE picks, but I think he will be more of a run support with an occasional sack then a great pass rusher.

Sturdivant is likely to hold more value in the future as a player, but 4-3 DE's are tough to get.
In a rookie draft, I would take Clayborn over Sturdivant, because I think I can get a LB easier.

[haydn239]

Your right standard scoring is a loaded question more looking at which is the BPA!

[Jimi Hendrix]

In a rookie draft, I would take Clayborn over Sturdivant, because I think I can get a LB easier.

[haydn239]

Got em thanks!

[ekassor]

Nice pick. Getting FF production from a SILB is pretty rare, getting FF production from a starting 4-3 DE is expected. It'll be interesting to see who has a better career between Clayborn and Bowers, cuz I thought about taking Clayborn at 6.07. I took Bowers for those not in League.

[cleanwillyb]

...Sturduvant will have a nice career being the SILB and setting up WILB Washington probably to be the better FF LB...

I'm confused by the wording, are you saying Washington or Sturduvant will be better in your opinion?

To the original question, I expect Clayborn to be more productive as a rookie, and it wouldn't surprise me to see him have the more productive career.

For what it's worth, in our recent rookie/FA draft Quan was literally the last pick of the draft, while I think Clayborn was taken in the late 2nd round.