the law can refuse a confession if they suspect, or even know, it's not true... for instance, the father (and mother/child) stand to lose several 10s of millions of dollars if the father is found to be the one who did it, so the mother confessesSkinZ187 wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2019 8:02 pmhow can you speak in such "absolutes"?Irbir wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2019 7:41 pm Adrian Peterson was suspended for a year for using a switch on his kid. Hill is going to get a year for breaking his kids arm. Doesn’t matter if he’s charged or pleads guilty like AP. The NFL can do as they please regardless and given Hill’s history and that recording they are not going to allow him to play this year. The PR hit will be too great otherwise.
they have text messages from crystal stating that she did it... is anybody naive enough to believe 100% that crystal did it because of those texts? i doubt it... i know i certainly dont.
BUT, if this situation unfolds with crystal declaring that she is the one that did it (meaning she takes the fall), i dont know how the league could completely disregard her "confession" and suspend tyreek for the whole season. that being said, i think he will def get some sort of suspension for what he said on the recording that was released.
still too many moving parts in this whole situation.
but my point stands -- who can you speak in such "absolutes"?
the league holds itself to lesser standards than the law