There are some interesting names from the college ranks, but that's always a risky and difficult line to walk.
I think John DeFilippo is probably the best young offensive mind that is available.
There are some interesting names from the college ranks, but that's always a risky and difficult line to walk.
I don’t think he makes it through this offseason. CLE has an opening already. Other teams with coaches on the hot seat: TB (likely fired), MIA (likely safe for 1 more yr), NYJ (50/50, rookie QB could buy 1 more yr), DEN (not looking good), JAX (depends how the team finishes). Think most of the other coaches are safe
He wins football games.
If that’s the case we’ve changed for the better0LDMAN wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:51 pmLook here son, if you ever take a real look back into the NFL you'll see it only very recently morphed into this 2018 flag football fancy men in tights very politely negotiating each other to the soft turf type of game. The NFL used to be a game of big hits, of dirty plays, of violence, of insane drug use, of getting a concussion meant you came back in the game two plays later if you even left in the first place. It was essentially a game for warriors, played only by the toughest craziest SOBS around. I'm not trying to glorify it, just explaining. Many of the older coaches around today came from this era where I am sure things like a bounty were not only occurring but completely commonplace. This recent past has been purposely swept under the rug as much as possible because today's standards are quite, ahem, different. So Payton is respected and very few people in the NFL care about this because they are familiar with the history. There were many rumors about bounties going on, but stories like that never broke in those days.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:25 pm
I'm a bit younger and wasn't fully aware of all that went into boutygate before Williams most recent promotion, so maybe I'm a little ignorant, but how does this guy have a job in the NFL? How did he not serve jail time for encouraging players and paying them to not only injure people but to force concussions on players who had concussion history's? That's really messed up.
Furthermore how is Sean Payton still a respected NFL head coach?
Better is an interesting word. Some things are surely better, some things are simply different and make you feel better.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:07 pmIf that’s the case we’ve changed for the better0LDMAN wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:51 pmLook here son, if you ever take a real look back into the NFL you'll see it only very recently morphed into this 2018 flag football fancy men in tights very politely negotiating each other to the soft turf type of game. The NFL used to be a game of big hits, of dirty plays, of violence, of insane drug use, of getting a concussion meant you came back in the game two plays later if you even left in the first place. It was essentially a game for warriors, played only by the toughest craziest SOBS around. I'm not trying to glorify it, just explaining. Many of the older coaches around today came from this era where I am sure things like a bounty were not only occurring but completely commonplace. This recent past has been purposely swept under the rug as much as possible because today's standards are quite, ahem, different. So Payton is respected and very few people in the NFL care about this because they are familiar with the history. There were many rumors about bounties going on, but stories like that never broke in those days.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:25 pm
I'm a bit younger and wasn't fully aware of all that went into boutygate before Williams most recent promotion, so maybe I'm a little ignorant, but how does this guy have a job in the NFL? How did he not serve jail time for encouraging players and paying them to not only injure people but to force concussions on players who had concussion history's? That's really messed up.
Furthermore how is Sean Payton still a respected NFL head coach?
I’m not under the illusion that the NFL is a moral enterprise. However, that doesn’t make incremental change unimportant. Caring about players health is good. We can certainly do more.
Probably good you feel that way, since it looks like he will be going to Cleveland sooner than we thought. I didn't realize he is from Youngstown.Valhalla wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:21 pm Eh...I guess they can have him. Did you guys see that crapfest last night?
They NEEDED a hurry up and have the offensive talent to come back. They made so many boneheaded decisions it was tough to handle. They weren’t going for two when they should have been, which shows lack of understanding of stats there. They were calling runs up the gut with 5 minutes left down 3 scores with a full field to go, and then huddling back up. They didn’t run ANY hurry up. They bleep kept throwing quite short over the middle of the field. Of COURSE the Saints allow that! It’s accepting defeat to take 8 yards every 20 seconds!! bleep! Oh and then they get to the 1 with the clock ticking, huddle up, take their sweet bleep time, and do a bleep qb sneak! I mean do you need to huddle and spend a bunch of time to discuss a qb sneak!? Shouldn’t that be an impulse hurry up play!? All in all I was FAR from impressed on the game management there. The Saints were up 3 scores and their play style was aggressive still. The Vikings get down 3 scores and they turn conservative?!
Maybe the Vikings just look good on offense because Thielen and Diggs make so many great catches extending drives. Maybe it’s NOT DeFilippo.
It sounds like you're an idealist with a political bias. For most of its history NFL was violence, but now it sounds as if you're trying to rewrite in retrospect to ease your conscience, or perhaps simply pretend that didn't exist. I wish it disappointed more people that men like Colin were abandoned as children, but for some reason that doesn't get discussed.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:44 pmI’m not under the illusion that the NFL is a moral enterprise. However, that doesn’t make incremental change unimportant. Caring about players health is good. We can certainly do more.
But the fact that our choices as fans can create these changes is why I originally asked the questions about Williams and Peyton. Kaep gets stonewalled by the league becasue enough people are upset that he kneels, but no one seems to care that known purporters of violence continue to get rich in the NFL. It’s not “tough” or “gritty” to encourage hurting other people. It’s disgusting, and criminal in most contexts. But apparently the moral hierarchy of enough NFL fans/owners/influencers is such that violent crime is lesser than political disagreement (which in Kaep’s case is standing up for black people). I wish that disappointed more people.
Maybe cool it with the consistent ad hominem0LDMAN wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:41 amIt sounds like you're an idealist with a political bias. For most of its history NFL was violence, but now it sounds as if you're trying to rewrite in retrospect to ease your conscience, or perhaps simply pretend that didn't exist. I wish it disappointed more people that men like Colin were abandoned as children, but for some reason that doesn't get discussed.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:44 pmI’m not under the illusion that the NFL is a moral enterprise. However, that doesn’t make incremental change unimportant. Caring about players health is good. We can certainly do more.
But the fact that our choices as fans can create these changes is why I originally asked the questions about Williams and Peyton. Kaep gets stonewalled by the league becasue enough people are upset that he kneels, but no one seems to care that known purporters of violence continue to get rich in the NFL. It’s not “tough” or “gritty” to encourage hurting other people. It’s disgusting, and criminal in most contexts. But apparently the moral hierarchy of enough NFL fans/owners/influencers is such that violent crime is lesser than political disagreement (which in Kaep’s case is standing up for black people). I wish that disappointed more people.
Good idea, i'll shut it down.Blueboy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:55 pmMaybe cool it with the consistent ad hominem0LDMAN wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:41 amIt sounds like you're an idealist with a political bias. For most of its history NFL was violence, but now it sounds as if you're trying to rewrite in retrospect to ease your conscience, or perhaps simply pretend that didn't exist. I wish it disappointed more people that men like Colin were abandoned as children, but for some reason that doesn't get discussed.jcc6fd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:44 pm
I’m not under the illusion that the NFL is a moral enterprise. However, that doesn’t make incremental change unimportant. Caring about players health is good. We can certainly do more.
But the fact that our choices as fans can create these changes is why I originally asked the questions about Williams and Peyton. Kaep gets stonewalled by the league becasue enough people are upset that he kneels, but no one seems to care that known purporters of violence continue to get rich in the NFL. It’s not “tough” or “gritty” to encourage hurting other people. It’s disgusting, and criminal in most contexts. But apparently the moral hierarchy of enough NFL fans/owners/influencers is such that violent crime is lesser than political disagreement (which in Kaep’s case is standing up for black people). I wish that disappointed more people.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests