Michael Thomas or Tyreek Hill

[joeday]

Which WR would you rather have in dynasty and keeper leagues (NON PPR)

[JoshGordonsDealer]

Thomas but it's very, very close in non-PPR.

[AlPal&Ange]

In non-ppr Hill. You know who his qb is going to be for the next 4

[Blueboy]

Yeah, non-PPR it's Hill.

[Pullo Vision]

It would be closer in PPR, but Hill in non PPR.

[Chwf3rd]

Easily Hill for me. I think people are underestimating Brees' age and the impact that his retirement will have on MT.

[kadun2]

I think Hill is just getting started. Hill for me

[notweswelker]

I'll take Hill. MT is a great WR, but we've now seen Hill destroy teams with multiple QBs whereas MT has had one of the goats his whole career, who is inching toward retirement.

[Plank]

I love to build my teams with consistent as possible WR's then find guys like Tyreek Hill .. If my WR group didn't have many consistent guys I would prefer MT .. if I had some guys, say Thielen, Adams, Evans et al ... guys who put up 20/wk, then I would love Tyreek .. I mean, he can put up 30 to 40 in a week in good match-ups, no one can compete with that ..

[Cameron Giles]

Thomas for me. He's obviously not the speedster that Hill is, but I trust his route running and hands more. I think he's one of the best all-around WR's in the game. He's going to be elite even when Brees retires.

[wildabeast49]

I love to build my teams with consistent as possible WR's then find guys like Tyreek Hill .. If my WR group didn't have many consistent guys I would prefer MT .. if I had some guys, say Thielen, Adams, Evans et al ... guys who put up 20/wk, then I would love Tyreek .. I mean, he can put up 30 to 40 in a week in good match-ups, no one can compete with that ..

Perception is a funny thing. Hill has been a more consistent weekly producer than Evans the last two seasons (I posted the stats in another thread a few weeks ago) and regarding the idea that Thomas is so much higher floor lets look at this season so far.

This is .5 ppr to split the difference.

Thomas' weekly scores: 32, 26.9, 17.9, 6.7, 9.4, 16.4
Hills' weekly scores: 32.8, 17.5, 6.6, 10.1, 10.7, 35.7, 17.7

Preeeetty damn similar. Despite what people spout, Hill is not a boom or bust player, he is relatively high floor, with the huge boom.

[Mjvb5]

I love to build my teams with consistent as possible WR's then find guys like Tyreek Hill .. If my WR group didn't have many consistent guys I would prefer MT .. if I had some guys, say Thielen, Adams, Evans et al ... guys who put up 20/wk, then I would love Tyreek .. I mean, he can put up 30 to 40 in a week in good match-ups, no one can compete with that ..

Perception is a funny thing. Hill has been a more consistent weekly producer than Evans the last two seasons (I posted the stats in another thread a few weeks ago) and regarding the idea that Thomas is so much higher floor lets look at this season so far.

This is .5 ppr to split the difference.

Thomas' weekly scores: 32, 26.9, 17.9, 6.7, 9.4, 16.4
Hills' weekly scores: 32.8, 17.5, 6.6, 10.1, 10.7, 35.7, 17.7

Preeeetty damn similar. Despite what people spout, Hill is not a boom or bust player, he is relatively high floor, with the huge boom.

X2 another thing to note is just the boom/bust nature of receivers in general. All of the WRs, except AB and Landry kinda the past couple years, were boom or bust. Just the big play guys were perceived to be more so.

[Phaded]

I would rather go for Michael Thomas just because I trust his skill-set more Hill..

However - can you really go wrong with either guy?

[Ice]

Hill for me but agree you can't really go wrong.

The difference for me is Mahomes. Young with an arm even Hill can't outrun.