I don't agree with either player as a comparison for Watson, but just a note: 'a rich man's Tyrod Taylor' is Michael Vick.
With respect to how fantastic that game was to watch, USC's D was no patch on Bama's D last night.
I don't agree with either player as a comparison for Watson, but just a note: 'a rich man's Tyrod Taylor' is Michael Vick.
With respect to how fantastic that game was to watch, USC's D was no patch on Bama's D last night.
Not by a rookie, not like this. He's breaking records with every passing week.
Cam? RG3?
That's what I'm saying; Watson is presently blowing away what they did. Every week he's breaking records for x stats over x weeks by a rookie, in addition to the all-time record he just set yesterday for passing yards, TDs, and rushing yards in one game.
Good for him. Records are made to be broken.
i believe that your missing the point. most could care less who the overall qb 1 is. we could run down a list of the top scoring qb every year and most times we would find that it means absolutely nothing besides that you have an every week starter. of course we want the high end guys, who doesnt. if you drafted watson, your keeping him or selling for the farm...but it is truly irrelevant if he is the "#1 qb".
This.sloth8u wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:52 ami believe that your missing the point. most could care less who the overall qb 1 is. we could run down a list of the top scoring qb every year and most times we would find that it means absolutely nothing besides that you have an every week starter. of course we want the high end guys, who doesnt. if you drafted watson, your keeping him or selling for the farm...but it is truly irrelevant if he is the "#1 qb".
some are simply pointing out that others have been the top qb to be...in the past, and at the end of the day....does it really matter.
You're totally right, but this answer is exactly why I hate 1QB leagues with less than 16 teams. Having an awesome QB should mean something, and formats that devalue QBs are lame to me. But this is off-topic I guess.StableOfRBs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:17 amThis.sloth8u wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:52 ami believe that your missing the point. most could care less who the overall qb 1 is. we could run down a list of the top scoring qb every year and most times we would find that it means absolutely nothing besides that you have an every week starter. of course we want the high end guys, who doesnt. if you drafted watson, your keeping him or selling for the farm...but it is truly irrelevant if he is the "#1 qb".
some are simply pointing out that others have been the top qb to be...in the past, and at the end of the day....does it really matter.
Unless I'm in a 2QB league I don't care who my QB is, Dak/Wentz/Watson could all be the #1 dynasty QB but as long as it isn't like McCown or Hoyer/Beathard I'm not gonna sweat the position.
Watson could end his career 18 years from now having given you a minimum of 20 points each week or whatever and that's great for him and the people who own him but it's not like I'm gonna try and make a move to acquire him or reach for him in a startup, still gonna wait on QB like I have in redraft for the past 3 years and settle for a stable vet with less upside so I can upgrade at a different position.
I heard about it 2-3 years ago with Luck and I heard about it last year with Dak and I'm hearing about it this year with Watson, having the QB1 isn't as important as having a QB1, as long as I've got a solid starter every week (or even a couple low end guys to mix and match), I'm good.
Can't wait to have this conversation about Jackson or Darnold or Rosen or whoever in the next year or two, though.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests