I’m with you. I personally like Swift as the better talent and think people are really getting too worked up about his landing spot and ignoring some important points.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 10:00 amlol. Baltimore targeted their running backs a league low 51 times in Lamar's first full year. While teams that have mobile QBs tend to have better rushing efficiency, they also tend to have fewer targets. Houston, Buffalo, and Seattle produced the fourth, fifth, and sixth fewest targets. On average, in PPR leagues, targets are worth about 2.74 times as much as a carry. In a league where Ekeler was the RB4 with 557 rushing yards, Alvin Kamara was RB9 with 797 rushing yards, and James White was RB18 with 263(!!) rushing yards, (while 1000 yard rusher Marlon Mack was RB22) I don't think it makes sense to structure an entire evaluation of a situation around rushing yards.dlf_mikeh wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 9:07 am I already posted this privately a few places so I'll put it here:
Short answer: Dobbins.
Long answer: Both Dobbins & Swift are similar backs and both find themselves in a similar situation. The question is which situation is better. Swift will be competing with KJ while Dobbins will be competing with Ingram.
Baltimore was #1 in rushing with 206 yards per game. The Lions were towards the bottom with 103 yards per game. Take out Lamar Jackson's 75 yards per game, and Baltimore had 131 YPG, still good enough to put them top 10 in rushing. That's without subtracting other team QB carries, and without assuming the Ravens QB carries would be RB carries instead.
Simply put: Teams with mobile QBs also have RBs that get elevated stats. That being said, Dobbins is in a much better future position than Swift. Because of that, I would rather have Dobbins than Swift.
I suspect Detroit is being undervalued as a landing spot because we remember how bad their offense was when Stafford got hurt, and because Kerryon Johnson (who was an overrated prospect to begin with) busted there. They still managed 101 RB targets last year (21st) and 141 in 2018 (4th) with Stafford under center. I think both of these situations have their benefits and their negatives, and characterizing Dobbins' situation as comprehensively better than Swift's because Baltimore produce more rushing yards is misguided.
If you want to make an argument for Dobbins' situation, it's that Baltimore's offense is just better as a whole and is going to produce more touchdowns. Long term, the argument is that Baltimore's organization is better than Detroit's, so they're more likely to remain good than Detroit is to become good.
Dobbins was the last big five rb to get drafted. I think this was partially scheme fit (Ohio runs a lot of shotgun) and partially not having combine information. Everyone seems to be ignoring that all the big spots passed on him including Miami who passed multiple times (didn’t take an rb early though so maybe a wash).
I’m glad it was hit on how often the Ravens target running backs, the short answer is: not much. 26 receptions for Ingram last year and he can catch. Swifts receiving floor is strong and there’s no reason to assume Kerryon is there past next year either. The Lions and Stafford made Theo Riddick a flex play with how much they used to dump off to their rbs, that’s going to benefit Swift. I also want to point out PFF had the lions as the 11th best line last year and they drafted two more guards this year. Edge goes to Baltimore on line no question but don’t just assume their line is garbage.
Finally, Ingram might be back next year, yes they have an out but he’s a strong part of the Ravens culture (speaking as a Ravens fan here). If Ingram is there next year you’re now waiting two years for Dobbins and that’s not including that he’ll still be sharing carries with LJax and Gus the Bus (potentially). Dobbins efficiency will most likely be really good but it will have to be because I don’t anticipate bellcow touches even next year (202 carries for Ingram albeit missed some games). Ingram had weeks last year where he didn’t get a lot of touches and it hurt his output unless he got touchdowns.
FYI I took Swift over Dobbins at 4 fwiw to put my money where my mouth is. I’d like a share of Dobbins too, I do like him and want him doubly so because of my Ravens homer showing. That being said, it’s Swift for me.