12-team standard Superflex.
I have pick 1.08, I was leaning Hockenson initially but Fant has better measurables and landing spot. Hockenson was a top ten pick though!
What say you? Thanks!
Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27241
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
Hockenson is the better player. He also should be on the field more. Not sure how Fant has a better landing spot. Stafford is the better QB and they play in a dome. It also seems like Patricia wants a NE style team, and Hockenson could be his version of Gronk.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
- Gator Sens
- GOAT
- Posts: 53938
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:17 am
- Contact:
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
I like Fant more and I think Denver will force feed the TE position due to the lack of production over the past few years from the position. Not sure you can go wrong with either player.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:06 am
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
While I think Hockenson is the better overall football talent I expect Fant to be more productive fantasy player. Stafford struggles getting his TE's fantasy points and coaching staff there wants to play 1980's style football so expect him to be blocking a lot.
My PPR dynasties (QB/RB/WR/TE/FL):
Under construction...just noticed teams I had shown were very different than where they are now (lots of trading last 12 months). LOL
Under construction...just noticed teams I had shown were very different than where they are now (lots of trading last 12 months). LOL
- killer_of_giants
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:20 am
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
which is still better than being on the bench not blocking a lot...The Spartans wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2019 11:56 am coaching staff there wants to play 1980's style football so expect him to be blocking a lot.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:26 pm
- Location: Nagoya, JP
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
Hock for me. I like his landing spot better, and prefer 3 down TEs. They seem to be less situation dependant.
Dynasty player since 2002.
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...
- Hottoddies
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:29 pm
Re: Rookie Draft: Fant or Hockenson!?!?
I was faced with this very choice and I went with Fant. Hockenson is the better TE in real football terms but I don't get fantasy points for great blocking. I doesn't bother me that Fant won't be on the field for running plays. As long as he is a part of their passing attack I'll be happy. They will both be great fantasy TEs but Fant just seems to have a higher upside.
"Smart people learn from everything and everyone, average people from their experiences, stupid people already have all the answers." - Socrates
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests