Yea Spencer, you are comparing apples and oranges here.skip wrote:He's not. But you're basing rookie numbers from Rice with a crap QB to Harvin with Favre. Not a fair comparison at all.thewhyterabbit wrote:right favre's their future qb, you're right... wait a minute... never mind.skip wrote: Yeah, Rice was no where near as productive as a rookie with Favre throwing...oh wait a minute...never mind.
Basically your argument is assuming that the difference in Rice and Harvin right now is their experience....and you have no sure way of backing that up. However, we can say with MORE CERTAINTY that Rice has higher upside based on the level of production, as well as the level of consistency this year....We can say this because the conditions were the same for both players this year, only difference being their experience (Harvin 0 NFL starts, Sidney Rice 7), and their abilities....but their experience is not AS significant as you are making it out to be since Harvin was obviously EXPERIENCED ENOUGH TO START start half (8 of 16) of their games in his ROOKIE YEAR . Like I and many Sidney supporters have said...Rice's problem was never talent...it was getting, and staying on the field, and it clearly shows. Checkmate.