DGB for rookie draft pick...

[libertyaz]

So I am taking over a struggling keeper team, the average age of the team is probably 29... lets just say its not good, and i could use upgrades at every position. Another competing owner has offered me DGB for my *1.04 rookie pick. The thing is, in my league, we draft college prospects still in school AND draft rookies/FAs each year. So far, rookies already claimed/owned(and thus aren't available to draft) are as follows:

**Gordon, Gurley, Parker, Cooper, Abdullah, strong, mariota, winston, lockett, Yeldon, Agholor, M. Davis, Funchess, Coates, and Duke.**

I can say with almost certainty that the 1.01-1.03 picks before mine will be White, Coleman, and Perrimian. (the pick owners confirmed it).

That leaves realistic options for me at the 1.04 with Phillip Dorsett, Ajayi, Cobb, etc (anyone not listed above).

The question is, do you think i should trade my 1.04 for DGB? I need all the upside I can get, but its hard for me to pull the trigger. Please let me know!
Thanks guys!

[smastroi]

I'd take DGB over the guys you listed easily. Im not a huge DGB fan but his upside is way better than the players left.

[libertyaz]

btw, here is the roster... like i said, major rebuild...

QB: Tony Romo, Carson Palmer, Andy Dalton
RB Frank Gore, Darren McFadden, Christine Michael, Chris Ivory
WR Larry Fitzgerald, Doug Baldwin, Marques Colston, Markus Wheaton, Anquan Boldin, Harry Douglas
TE Delanie Walker, Martellus Bennett, Coby Fleener, Jace Amaro

Prospects
WR Rashad Greene, Florida State

[Russnrach]

I would take DGB...

[kwade7575]

DGB easyily

[libertyaz]

anyone advise against taking DGB here, or is this a clear win?

[StrikeAnywhere]

I would also take DGB over the options left.

[BAMtastic]

Take dgb and start trsding your old players for future picks. No sense being minimal cintender oicking mid rd every yr when you can rebuild properly