Trading for DT and Jimmy

[arikisdumb]

Team 1 below. 2 TE league

I have been trying to trade for Jimmy by offering nelson plus a little for him but the owner won't bite. I have been also toying with the idea of DT from him as well.

His wr and te:

WR: DT, Evans, Marshall, Steve Smith, Decker, Crabtree
TE: Jimmy, Cook

I was thinking of offering Jordy, Alshon, Witten for DT and Jimmy

Too much? Not enough? Or would it be better to just stick with what I have?

[imi814]

i doubt that would get accepted. seems a little lite especially in a 2 TE league. I think you would have to add a #1 to your side to get the other guy to seriously consider.

[flyersfan1981]

Witten has such little value I don't see any way that offer is considered. Add Maclin and a 1st and you have a shot.

[arikisdumb]

yea its probably a little low. I sent it to him, got the talks going

[maxhyde]

Team 1 below. 2 TE league

I have been trying to trade for Jimmy by offering nelson plus a little for him but the owner won't bite. I have been also toying with the idea of DT from him as well.

His wr and te:

WR: DT, Evans, Marshall, Steve Smith, Decker, Crabtree
TE: Jimmy, Cook

I was thinking of offering Jordy, Alshon, Witten for DT and Jimmy

Too much? Not enough? Or would it be better to just stick with what I have?

Witten is not nearly enough to make up the gap
DT > Alshon
JG > Jordy
You will need at LEAST a high 1st and Witten...or equivalent type value

[arikisdumb]

He countered with

me giving: jordy, alshon, witten, 2016 first, 2016 third
for: dt and jimmy

[maxhyde]

yup. I would do that.
Gives you an impossibly strong lineup even with the RB issue

[dlf_jules]

I'd take it too.

[arikisdumb]

I'd take it too.

Should it matter if it would keep me from having a first for the next three years? (recently traded 2015 and 2017 first in a deal for Julio). I know there is plenty of time to get one down the road.

I am also in casual talks regrading trading for the 1.1 this year as well, which would have to include the 2016 first, should I hold off until I see if I can get that to help the rb situation or do you think I should just go with this?

[Ray Finkle]

He countered with

me giving: jordy, alshon, witten, 2016 first, 2016 third
for: dt and jimmy

Booyah!

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I'd take it too.

Should it matter if it would keep me from having a first for the next three years? (recently traded 2015 and 2017 first in a deal for Julio). I know there is plenty of time to get one down the road.

I am also in casual talks regrading trading for the 1.1 this year as well, which would have to include the 2016 first, should I hold off until I see if I can get that to help the rb situation or do you think I should just go with this?

I'd make this trade and not worry about RB. With Luck/Rodgers and Gronk/Graham and your WR corps, you can start Trent Richardson and Darren McFadden and still be super competitive.

[cparkin]

Your lineup would be the top two quarterbacks, top two tight ends, and three of the top 5 receivers. I think that you would be OK with the running backs that you have

[HawkeyeState]

Your lineup would be the top two quarterbacks, top two tight ends, and three of the top 5 receivers. I think that you would be OK with the running backs that you have

THIS. TAKE THE DEAL AND DOMINATE

[arikisdumb]

Final deal:

I got: jimmy, dt, 4.9
gave: jordy alshon witten 2016 first

[maxhyde]

Final deal:

I got: jimmy, dt, 4.9
gave: jordy alshon witten 2016 first

Good deal to get those guys...