Thoughts?????

[HOFC12]

I have an owner who would do Stafford and a 2nd from me for Brees and Britt. I know that on the surface it looks like a slam dunk but this is a dynasty league. My team is not a championship team imo. Brees definetly is the premier QB. But does he get my team to championship caliber status? Stafford is 24 years old. Looking like a future stud himself. Britt is a ticking time bomb, but has the potential(that word has gotten a lot of coaches fired) to be an AJG, DT, Julio type WR. If I knew Britt was gonna realize his potential, I would do this in a heart beat. Your thoughts?

[WZA]

bleep. If you're rebuilding then trading for a QB like Bree's who is at the tail end of his career is a bad move. Stick with Stafford and ride him for the next 10 years.

[collbey]

I agree that this trade isn't going to put you in the upper echelon of teams, however it is such great value I would do it figuring you can ultimately trade Brees & Britt and get better value for them.

[WZA]

Britt is overrated. He's always injured. He will be difficult to trade. You'll never get fair value for Bree's when you try to trade him for a young stud QB...like Stafford.

This trade only makes since if you are a contender. Even then I wouldn't do it.

[kmbryant09]

Britt is overrated. He's always injured. He will be difficult to trade. You'll never get fair value for Bree's when you try to trade him for a young stud QB...like Stafford.

This trade only makes since if you are a contender. Even then I wouldn't do it.

Just curious why you wouldn't do it as a contender?

Brees >> Stafford for the next 2-3 years.
Britt >> a 2nd round rookie pick. Even though I hate Britt.

[WZA]

Britt is overrated. He's always injured. He will be difficult to trade. You'll never get fair value for Bree's when you try to trade him for a young stud QB...like Stafford.

This trade only makes since if you are a contender. Even then I wouldn't do it.

Just curious why you wouldn't do it as a contender?

Brees >> Stafford for the next 2-3 years.
Britt >> a 2nd round rookie pick. Even though I hate Britt.

Because I don't want Britt anywhere near my roster and I'd rather have Stafford than Brees, believe it or not. Why make the trade and then have to accept below market value for Brees when you try to trade him for a young stud QB? 3 years from now nobody will trade a young stud QB for Brees. Keep the young stud QB you have now and roll with it. It's difficult to find a guy with Stafford's talent. Don't mortgage the future for 2-3 years of a possible title run. You can win a title with a Stafford.

And I would rather take flier on a 2 round rookie WR than have Brittle on my roster...just my opinion.

[Farley]

Brees has gone before Stafford in all 4 of the start-ups of done this year.
Britt is a way better lotto ticket to hold than a random 2nd.
Your team is that far away from being a contender.
Live a little. Have some fun and pull the trigger.

[kmbryant09]

Britt is overrated. He's always injured. He will be difficult to trade. You'll never get fair value for Bree's when you try to trade him for a young stud QB...like Stafford.

This trade only makes since if you are a contender. Even then I wouldn't do it.

Just curious why you wouldn't do it as a contender?

Brees >> Stafford for the next 2-3 years.
Britt >> a 2nd round rookie pick. Even though I hate Britt.

Because I don't want Britt anywhere near my roster and I'd rather have Stafford than Brees, believe it or not. Why make the trade and then have to accept below market value for Brees when you try to trade him for a young stud QB? 3 years from now nobody will trade a young stud QB for Brees. Keep the young stud QB you have now and roll with it. It's difficult to find a guy with Stafford's talent. Don't mortgage the future for 2-3 years of a possible title run. You can win a title with a Stafford.

And I would rather take flier on a 2 round rookie WR than have Brittle on my roster...just my opinion.

You just prefaced your comment with "if I was a contender". If I was looking to shape my roster as best as possible for a win-now mode, than this trade is a no-brainer.

Like others have said, Brees holds more dynasty value overall than Stafford - and MUCH more in the short term. Brees' June 2013 Dynasty ADP places him as the 4th QB, Stafford the 10th. So the gap in just the short term is even wider.

And you'd rather a mid-2nd than Kenny Britt - in the short term? I hate Kenny Britt, and I will not own him on any my teams, but I would gladly take him over a mid-2nd any day of the week. Especially when you consider that just about all mid-2nd rookie picks are long term prospects that won't produce a lick for 1-3 years. And for reference, Britt's June 2013 Dynasty ADP places him essentially worth the 1.6-1.7 rookie pick.

I understand your last post here, it just didn't jive with what you seemed to say with the post before that.