Help please ASAP!

[sct]

Don't like either deal for you. If you're contending keep both

Really? In my mind, Hopkins>Chubb, Henderson>Williams, Johnson> AB

[SteveMaddensShoes]

Don't like either deal for you. If you're contending keep both

Really? In my mind, Hopkins>Chubb, Henderson>Williams, Johnson> AB

It would take 2 hopkins to equal one chubb at this point

[sct]

Don't like either deal for you. If you're contending keep both

Really? In my mind, Hopkins>Chubb, Henderson>Williams, Johnson> AB

It would take 2 hopkins to equal one chubb at this point

Interesting. I guess I know that I am buying Hopkins low but I still think Hopkins is the better asset in a PPR format and I’m happy to get him low. I don’t think Chubb will ever get the majority of the touches in the backfield and definitely not the PPR numbers that we keep wishing he would. He’s an amazing real running back but not that amazing when it comes to fantasy points. Pumpkin seems like he’s been very disappointing and yet has scored 12 more fantasy points for Nick Chubb at this point. So I’m not quite sure how chubb equals 2Hopkins

[SteveMaddensShoes]

Really? In my mind, Hopkins>Chubb, Henderson>Williams, Johnson> AB

It would take 2 hopkins to equal one chubb at this point

Interesting. I guess I know that I am buying Hopkins low but I still think Hopkins is the better asset in a PPR format and I’m happy to get him low. I don’t think Chubb will ever get the majority of the touches in the backfield and definitely not the PPR numbers that we keep wishing he would. He’s an amazing real running back but not that amazing when it comes to fantasy points. Pumpkin seems like he’s been very disappointing and yet has scored 12 more fantasy points for Nick Chubb at this point. So I’m not quite sure how chubb equals 2Hopkins

Maybe a slight exaggeration, but Hopkins is a 29 year old WR on pace for 70 catches for 980 yards on less than 100 targets over 16 games. I still think he is a stud but I don't see the situation changing this year. Then next year he is 30 in the same situation unless traded(I don't know the salary cap situation on him) It's just not that hard to replace that production in dynasty.

Chubb is as elite as anyone running the ball. He is on track to again be a mid RB1 and he actually has some room to go higher considering he doesn't catch passes. RB scarcity is a thing as well. There are 47 guys catching 70 passes for 900 yards(not really but sort of)

I'd say if you want to buy low on Hopkins go for it, but know 95% of us would much rather have Chubb.

[sct]

It would take 2 hopkins to equal one chubb at this point

Interesting. I guess I know that I am buying Hopkins low but I still think Hopkins is the better asset in a PPR format and I’m happy to get him low. I don’t think Chubb will ever get the majority of the touches in the backfield and definitely not the PPR numbers that we keep wishing he would. He’s an amazing real running back but not that amazing when it comes to fantasy points. Pumpkin seems like he’s been very disappointing and yet has scored 12 more fantasy points for Nick Chubb at this point. So I’m not quite sure how chubb equals 2Hopkins

Maybe a slight exaggeration, but Hopkins is a 29 year old WR on pace for 70 catches for 980 yards on less than 100 targets over 16 games. I still think he is a stud but I don't see the situation changing this year. Then next year he is 30 in the same situation unless traded(I don't know the salary cap situation on him) It's just not that hard to replace that production in dynasty.

Chubb is as elite as anyone running the ball. He is on track to again be a mid RB1 and he actually has some room to go higher considering he doesn't catch passes. RB scarcity is a thing as well. There are 47 guys catching 70 passes for 900 yards(not really but sort of)

I'd say if you want to buy low on Hopkins go for it, but know 95% of us would much rather have Chubb.

I get that. But it’s not Chubb for Hopkins in a vacuum either. I love Henderson and Akers will never be the same. Not worried about him. Love Diontae too.