Two offers on the table (w/poll)

[Irbir]

I’m a contender but I’m thinking I could use some WR and TE help. I have two offers made to me and would like to know if I should pull the trigger on either. League/team details below. Thanks!

14 team non-ppr
QB: Dak, Mayfield, Tua (start 1)
RB: Chubb, Zeke, CEH, Dobbins, Mixon (start 2)
WR: Evans, Diggs, Jeudy, Hilton, Thomas (start 3)
TE: Goedert, Engram (start 1)
2021 picks: 1.09, 2.03, 3.05

[Ruggenater]

I feel like you should be getting a better return for those RBs in a non-PPR, start 2 RB, 14 team league.

I also don’t think Fant is really a meaningful upgrade over what you have—if you’re going to target TE, a player in the Kelce/Kittle/Waller tier makes more sense to me.

[Gator Sens]

I would hold here. The Pitts offer has the value because of his current value and McLaurin helps your build, but I would hold. I would not fault anyone for taking it though but I would not want to buy Pitts at his current price.

[OhSnapItsAnt]

Tough to lose Chubb but I’d go Pitts/Terry pretty easy here for me. Getting some SOLID long term pieces and I believe this actually makes you a stronger contender. Losing Chubb doesn’t seem to hurt your team at all.

[CGW]

Id take the Chubb deal. I dont invest heavily into second contract RBs, and you have plenty of depth at RB to make this move. Pitts and Mclaurin are long term pieces that will be helping your build long beyond Chubb's career.

[Amishbeard]

Just because he has depth doesn't mean he should sell short.

Chubb in a 14 man must start 2 RB should get more of a return. Or he shouldn't be adding.

[Mtt33]

Chubb deal is intriguing, but I’d personally hold. No interest in the Mixon deal.