Zeke Sutton + for 1.01 + (poll)

[MyTeam]

Team 1 Below. 1QB

I am competing but I am not the best team in the league. I like to move RBs on their second contract for younger RBs to stay competative. The 1.02 is taking Etienne. He needs a RB really bad to compete.

Would you give: Zeke, Sutton and Gallup/Shenault
Get: 1.01, 1.03, 1.07

So I would take 1.01 Harris 1.03 Chase and then Lawrence at 1.07. Then with 4 and 6 I will take Pitts and either Smith or Williams.

[Gator Sens]

I think the value is close overall, but I think you are leaving a bit on the table. I still think Zeke bounces back elite though. If you are ready to move on, this is likely top value.

[MyTeam]

I think the value is close overall, but I think you are leaving a bit on the table. I still think Zeke bounces back elite though. If you are ready to move on, this is likely top value.

I do think Zeke bounces back to an elite level but I also think the utilization of Harris in Pittsburg will make him more valuable by the end of the year due to Zeke's age and mileage. I think Chase is very clearly above Sutton and I think I'd rather take Smith or Williams over Shenault/Gallup.

It definitely adds a lot of question marks to my team but I like getting young studs without losing value.

[murphysxm]

I do think Zeke bounces back to an elite level but I also think the utilization of Harris in Pittsburg will make him more valuable by the end of the year due to Zeke's age and mileage.

I am not ready to make this statement. I stand by my stance that Alabama RB's have to prove to me they can run the football without the massive holes they had in college before I buy in. There have been more busts than hits in recent years. If nothng else, I would wait until Zeke puts up Zeke numbers and sell from a position of strength.

[jwb32]

That value is too good to pass up.
1.01 > Zeke. Even IF Zeke bounces back, the value cliff is near. You'll be kicking yourself next year.
1.03 >> Sutton
1.07 >> Shenault

[M-Dub]

I’m a little confused. Are you giving up BOTH Shenault AND Gallup, or just one of them? I have it as Viska > 1.07 > Gallup, so if you’re deciding which one to move, I’d send Gallup.

I definitely prefer 1.01 and 1.03 to Zeke and Sutton. I’d do my best to hang onto Shenault though.

[MyTeam]

I’m a little confused. Are you giving up BOTH Shenault AND Gallup, or just one of them? I have it as Viska > 1.07 > Gallup, so if you’re deciding which one to move, I’d send Gallup.

I definitely prefer 1.01 and 1.03 to Zeke and Sutton. I’d do my best to hang onto Shenault though.

I offered it without a third player (Just Sutton and Zeke) and he said he needed the third player for depth. Then I asked about Gallup but he didn't respond. So I offered Gallup first, then I will offer Viska if he rejects that.