Waller/ACooper vs Stafford/1.06 (SF)

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.

SF Trade

Waller, ACooper & MDavis
1
25%
Stafford & 1.06
3
75%
 
Total votes: 4

Midnight
Captain
Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:31 pm

Waller/ACooper vs Stafford/1.06 (SF)

Postby Midnight » Thu May 13, 2021 9:31 am

Team 1 in sig SF .5ppr
watson has put me in a tough QB situation.
Other than QB my team is ready for a title.

Give: Waller Cooper & MDavis
Get: Stafford & 1.06

Would still have Fant & Gesicki at TE & potentially Pitts at 1.06 if i make this trade.


Thoughts??
Year #9 (3 titles)
12 teams SF .5 PPR 4pt passing TDs
1QB 1RB 2WR 1TE 3Flex 1SF 0Kickers

QB- Watson, Herbert, Tua, Purdy
RB- CMC, RWhite, JCook, Swift, Gibson, TyChand
WR- Tyreek, Cupp, Cooper, Palmer, MT13
TE- Kmet, Chig, Likely


Team #2 (going full rebuild in 2022)
year #6 (3 titles)
Fields, richardson, DJones
Charbonnet, Dobbins & bunch of bleep
Chase, Lamb, Waddle, Doubs, Boutte, ZJones, OBJ, Ross
Chig, Gray, Parham
DT-buckner, Madubukie
DE-JBosa, NBosa, ZCollins, Gary, JoshSweat
LB-Leonard, Oluokun, DWhite, DClark, Gay
CB-Lenoir
S-Dugger, Love, Grant, Kearse, Blackmon

User avatar
Gator Sens
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 53938
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Waller/ACooper vs Stafford/1.06 (SF)

Postby Gator Sens » Thu May 13, 2021 9:36 am

Tough call here. I think the value is on your side in the deal, but losing Waller and Cooper really hurts your build overall and could change your outlook as a contender. I might see how the Watson issues play out and maybe you only lose him for 6 weeks in the end. Again, I think you win the deal on value, but it hurts your non- QB build overall.

punintended
Starter
Starter
Posts: 679
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:53 am

Re: Waller/ACooper vs Stafford/1.06 (SF)

Postby punintended » Thu May 13, 2021 1:50 pm

i would wait on this trade... i like it and in SF that 1.6 could be a very good skill position player or even a QB that slips (fields?) \

you have the depth at RB to make up for the 3 flex spots too so i can see why it would work. tough call.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 39 guests