Even though you don’t NEED to start a QB, it’s similar to superflex where you’re at a significant disadvantage when you don’t have a QB in that flex spot.
That said, I’d also take the Akers deal and hope one of the QBs falls to the earliest pick.
Even though you don’t NEED to start a QB, it’s similar to superflex where you’re at a significant disadvantage when you don’t have a QB in that flex spot.
Right but because you MUST start a TE, there is a huge difference in starting Kelce vs starting the 20th best TE last year. Likely more than starting a QB vs a RB/WRRuggenater wrote: ↑Fri May 14, 2021 5:17 amEven though you don’t NEED to start a QB, it’s similar to superflex where you’re at a significant disadvantage when you don’t have a QB in that flex spot.
That said, I’d also take the Akers deal and hope one of the QBs falls to the earliest pick.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Payton34, Peener, The.Big.Spank and 148 guests