Pass on lawrence at 1.1 in sf?

[sloth8u]

Already own herbert, burrow, tannehill, and wentz and own the 1.1....i have tried moving tanny and wentz with no takers. A few offers for burrow and herbert but offers were laughable in the format. Any way I can pass on lawrence? My initial thought is to take him and figure it out later, but with nothing materializing with the 4qbs I currently own, I'm wondering if I should just take my top positional player here. Also own 1.8 so realistically I could add chase and another wr at 8 to go with jefferson and sutton as my only other notable wrs. Only other notable players are dalvin and hock.

[Needalife]

Interesting. On the surface, I say take Lawrence. If you are getting the next Peyton Manning, you can’t pass on that. However, it depends a little on format. In a 10-team, I might be more open to a non-QB position. 12 and over, it’s Lawrence. Great spot to see if you can slide down from 1.01 to 1.03/1.04 range and pick up some good assets.

Overall though, I’m taking Trevor.

[Tombstone]

In SF you can not pass on Lawrence. Just draft him and work some trades after. My only other thought is trade back to 3 or 4 and still get Chase and probably another pick.

[SteveMaddensShoes]

You should take him unless you can get true value for him which is 1.08 in a start up. So maybe 3 1sts? If you could get that I'd probably trade him. I can see a case to be made for taking 2 different QBs and another player and figure one of the QBs works out to be a top 12 in dynasty eventually.

[tsarpepe]

Even if you're not getting good offers for you current QBs, I'm shocked that no one is offering you a haul to move into 1.1. If I were in that league, I'd be pretty demoralize. Surely someone needs a great QB prospect in SF. Are they just deadbeats?

[Gator Sens]

If there is no great trade options, I would still go Lawrence and I think his value/all your QB depth value goes up in season. Offseason values can be pretty funky or too pricey for most owners. Low ball offers seem to be a bit more common at this time of year.

[HughHoney]

Definitely take Lawrence. Unfortunate you’re getting bad offers for Burrow/Herbert but can’t pass on the value. A lot (most?) value Lawrence above both of those and you’ll be able to move one of the three for a lot sooner rather than later.

[SteveMaddensShoes]

You are basically losing value with either the 1.01 or trading Wentz or Tannehill later. I'd rather take the loss of value on that latter two than on Trevor.

[Mtt33]

You have to take Lawrence if 12+ teams or trade out. If 10 teams or less go rb with your situation.

[M-Dub]

I’m in agreement with much of the above advice. First of all, if it’s a 10-team league, just take whoever you like most of Lawrence/Chase/Harris/Etienne. If it’s 12+ teams and nobody is offering you a haul for Lawrence, then you just have to draft him and wait it out. You’ll have five starting QBs in a SF league. If nobody is making a Godfather offer for one of them right now, they will once the season starts.

From the info you’ve given, it sounds like you’re not a strong contender, so I’d just stay patient and wait for the QB-needy teams to come calling.

[sloth8u]

Thanks for the feedback. It is played as a 12 teamer. After looking through rosters a bit deeper, I could see pick 2 taking qb aswell then a run of positional players. Leaving me with qb or 6th best on my board at 8. The plus side of this (if I can't get a trade done) is I won't need to worry about qb for several yrs.

[dvpkwys]

Lawrence or trade it.

[pmart33]

See if you can trade it and move back a few spots. That way you get a top positional prospect and pick up some extra draft capital or a player that can help you. That would be plan A for me if I were you.

If you can't find a deal that interests you, I don't think its a Cardinal Sin to pass on Lawrence at 1.01 in favor of someone like Harris or Chase (assuming they land in a great spot tonight) like some others do, but you need to accept the fact that you may regret not taking Lawrence for a long time if you pass on him.

[BradysBunch]

I think Lawrence will have more trade value...but if you are in love with a guy and you want him, its only fantasy football...

[CGW]

Take lawrence or trade back. Lawrence will have significantly more value in a 12tm SF than any other player. If you have 5 of the 32 starting QBs, you are in pretty good shape to find a trade partner needing a QB later.