Saquon or Lamb+1.02

[lostcause]

1 QB/ppr
Could use the RB production and still have Nuk/AJB/Aiyuk/Hilton/JuJu behind Lamb in a start 3 WR/No Flex lineup.

Thanks in advance

[Gator Sens]

Very close here. Do you think Chase drops to the 1.02?

[lostcause]

Very close here. Do you think Chase drops to the 1.02?

I don't think so; 1.01 has no glaring needs and is likely to go BPA.

[dustyroads]

Keep Lamb and draft you're fav RB at 1.02. Obviously odds are they won't wind up being a Barkley skill wise; but considering his age, injuries, and playing on the Giants, I don't think it's crazy to see one of these top rookies in a good landing spot put up comparable scoring to him. At the very least, I don't see the scoring difference being worth giving up Lamb for.

[Gator Sens]

Very close here. Do you think Chase drops to the 1.02?

I don't think so; 1.01 has no glaring needs and is likely to go BPA.

Lamb+ for me based on this.

[BradysBunch]

Lamb and 1.2.

[Jigga94]

If it's smaller starting requirements and a competing team, I'm taking Barkley. Lamb is valuable but I don't really like these RB. Depending on them for production without knowing landing spot or who goes 1.01 see.s risky

[MEuRaH]

Lamb & 1.02, no contest for me.

Lamb alone I think will eventually get towards the same tier as Barkley, and that's assuming Barkley is back to form following his injury. The difference between Lamb & Barkley is not 1.02 imo.

You could probably flip that pick Sanders, and Lamb/Sanders > Barkley.

[Anteaters]

Lamb+1.02.
I'm a big Barkley booster and I'd rather have Lamb and BestRBAvailable.
Also, in a 3WR setup, Lamb as WR3 is a big improvement over any of the others as WR3.
How many teams in league?

[krtbuckeye]

I would take Lamb/1.02, but I’ve even offered Adams for Lamb straight up (and got laughed off), so I’m high on him.