Mike Evans or 1.05

[Themissingrum]

Team 2 in signature.

We are part of the way through the first round of our draft (1st round before NFL draft, 2nd & 3rd after draft, 4th- 6th after training camp)
1.01 Trevor Lawrence
1.02 Travis Etienne
1.03 Kyle Pitts
1.04 OTC

I have been offered Mike Evans + 2.11 for my 1.05
My original target was Jamarr Chase, but not might go Justin Fields if he is still there.

Should I make the trade though?

[Gator Sens]

Looks like there are a fair amount of holes on your roster and I would rather hold and go with the youth. Evans is a great piece but is a bit older and never seems to carry a lot of value on the market. Pass for me based on build.

[tsarpepe]

That's an interesting way of doing a rookie draft.

[krtbuckeye]

I don't think Evans does much to push the team forward far enough to make this deal worth it. I like Evans, but as gator mentioned, his trade value seems to never match his production. You're more likely to get a more integral long term piece (QB) or a guy like Chase, who would likely hold more trade value moving forward (even if only on hype and potential).

[DynastyDynasty]

1.05 over Evans pretty easily for me.

[BradysBunch]

In SF, give me the pick.

[abloom]

In a SF with 2 non QBs going in the top 3 give me the 1.05 to draft a qb

[Buckhill Bombers]

SF 1.5 easily. If 1 QB, and I'm a contender, Evans easily.

[Themissingrum]

Thanks everyone.
I didn't take the trade.

Fields went 1.04
I took Chase at 1.05
Najee Harris went 1.06

I am now trying to trade into the 1.09 spot, hopefully to grab Trey Lance.
Then next years 4 x 1st can be used to get RBs and TEs to finish the rebuild (draft and trade)

[abloom]

Thanks everyone.
I didn't take the trade.

Fields went 1.04
I took Chase at 1.05
Najee Harris went 1.06

I am now trying to trade into the 1.09 spot, hopefully to grab Trey Lance.
Then next years 4 x 1st can be used to get RBs and TEs to finish the rebuild (draft and trade)

I think Chase will be fine, but you would have been better off with a QB for value.

[Jigga94]

Thanks everyone.
I didn't take the trade.

Fields went 1.04
I took Chase at 1.05
Najee Harris went 1.06

I am now trying to trade into the 1.09 spot, hopefully to grab Trey Lance.
Then next years 4 x 1st can be used to get RBs and TEs to finish the rebuild (draft and trade)

I think Chase will be fine, but you would have been better off with a QB for value.

I thought the same at first but look at those starting reqs

12 Team - PPR, TE Premium, SFlex
1QB, 1SuperFlex, 3RB, 5WR, 2TE, 2Flex, 17 Bench, 10 Taxi

That definitely reduces the impact of QB in normal SF leagues and he has a good QB stable as is

[abloom]

Thanks everyone.
I didn't take the trade.

Fields went 1.04
I took Chase at 1.05
Najee Harris went 1.06

I am now trying to trade into the 1.09 spot, hopefully to grab Trey Lance.
Then next years 4 x 1st can be used to get RBs and TEs to finish the rebuild (draft and trade)

I think Chase will be fine, but you would have been better off with a QB for value.

I thought the same at first but look at those starting reqs

12 Team - PPR, TE Premium, SFlex
1QB, 1SuperFlex, 3RB, 5WR, 2TE, 2Flex, 17 Bench, 10 Taxi

That definitely reduces the impact of QB in normal SF leagues and he has a good QB stable as is

Will say have not played in a league that deep but I have a suspicion that QB values are still higher than WR values. Additionally drafting before the NFL draft makes me feel better about grabbing a QB than a WR.

[blacklab1010]

I think Chase will be fine, but you would have been better off with a QB for value.

I thought the same at first but look at those starting reqs

12 Team - PPR, TE Premium, SFlex
1QB, 1SuperFlex, 3RB, 5WR, 2TE, 2Flex, 17 Bench, 10 Taxi

That definitely reduces the impact of QB in normal SF leagues and he has a good QB stable as is

Will say have not played in a league that deep but I have a suspicion that QB values are still higher than WR values. Additionally drafting before the NFL draft makes me feel better about grabbing a QB than a WR.

Just wanted to add to the discussion about qb value in deep SF leagues. I play in a league that is similar and we have never had a qb go 1.01. our starting requirements in sig. This year I expect to see lawrence go 1.01. We started our league in 2014 and I think 1.04 is the highest I have ever seen a qb go in our rookie drafts.

[Themissingrum]

Last year we had Burrow and Tua go #1 and #2
Herbert and Lover were #10 and #11.

This year was Lawrence #1. Fields #4. Lance #8. Wilson #11. Jones #12

But yeah in general positions become more important again. I actually think it has a really nice balance to it, although can be tough to build a roster.

The odd drafting means that the 2.01 and 2.02 are often seen as more valuable than 1.12 because you can tell landing spot.

[abloom]

I thought the same at first but look at those starting reqs

12 Team - PPR, TE Premium, SFlex
1QB, 1SuperFlex, 3RB, 5WR, 2TE, 2Flex, 17 Bench, 10 Taxi

That definitely reduces the impact of QB in normal SF leagues and he has a good QB stable as is

Will say have not played in a league that deep but I have a suspicion that QB values are still higher than WR values. Additionally drafting before the NFL draft makes me feel better about grabbing a QB than a WR.

Just wanted to add to the discussion about qb value in deep SF leagues. I play in a league that is similar and we have never had a qb go 1.01. our starting requirements in sig. This year I expect to see lawrence go 1.01. We started our league in 2014 and I think 1.04 is the highest I have ever seen a qb go in our rookie drafts.

10 team is very different than 12