6.05 OTC

[Dynos]

so gonna start a new dynasty startup i have 1.06, it's a 10 team league PPR

1QB--2RB--3WR--1TE--
1 flex QB/RB
1 flex WR/TE
1 flex RB/WR/TE

So it went
1.1 mahomes
1.2 josh allen
1.3 kyler murray
1.4 mccaffrey
1.5 barkley

Im torn between justin herbert and jonathan taylor

[BucBuc]

Dak and start hammering wr hard with one of the flex being wr or te only that is darn near a start 4 we set up.... unless a stud rb falls I'd either go qb qb wr on out or qb rb qb but that undoubtedly kill your wr core

[abloom]

Barkley in a 10 teamer

[Mtt33]

Those QBs shouldn’t be gone in 10 team (my opinion of course) Barkley or your favorite rb.

[Gator Sens]

Barkley seems like a good play here. Grab a QB after and lock up a bunch of wr's as the draft goes after your QBs are settled.

[crip7300]

I almost always shop my 1st round pick to try and acquire future 1sts and more start up draft capital, as long as I don't move down too far. If keeping the pick, I would go either Barkley or JT.

[zaner75]

10 team with 8 (potentially 9) non-QB starters, I would lean to stud RB in the 1st even though I am usually QB early.

[Jigga94]

Herbert, although I wouldn't be shocked to see him picked where you think Watson would go. In that case I'd probably go Lamar or Dak. I'm definitely snagging a QB in the first of a SF startup pretty much no matter what. Made the mistake of going RB before and boom 2-3 years later their value is tanking

[krtbuckeye]

I would go a Barkley or a Taylor, QB in the 2nd, then land as many young stud WRs as possible.

[Dynos]

strategy 1: Herbert 1st round - 2nd round- taylor if he's there or a young WR like ceedee,jefferson + 3rd round go with wr or rb depending on second round or bpa

strategy 2: taylor or barkley 1st round- 2nd round young wr (except a young qb slide but i doubt) - 3rd round go qb like wilson

[Jcedwards]

I think with it being SF, you got to go with either Dak or Lamar. But I can also see the case for a stud RB in Barkley or Taylor there and taking the best QB starting in round 2.

[Jigga94]

I think with it being SF, you got to go with either Dak or Lamar. But I can also see the case for a stud RB in Barkley or Taylor there and taking the best QB starting in round 2.

My opinion on this is that the QB tend to dry up quickly in SF drafts. I'd rather gamble on getting a RB a few picks later than Taylor, than to miss out on my top tier of QBs.

I do see that it's 10 team now so I wouldnt rule out JT being there in the 2nd at #15... And if a lot of teams go more RB/WR heavy, I wouldn't mind grabbing 2 top QB

[Jcedwards]

I think with it being SF, you got to go with either Dak or Lamar. But I can also see the case for a stud RB in Barkley or Taylor there and taking the best QB starting in round 2.

My opinion on this is that the QB tend to dry up quickly in SF drafts. I'd rather gamble on getting a RB a few picks later than Taylor, than to miss out on my top tier of QBs.

I do see that it's 10 team now so I wouldnt rule out JT being there in the 2nd at #15... And if a lot of teams go more RB/WR heavy, I wouldn't mind grabbing 2 top QB

True. I'm not very familiar with SF drafts, so I honestly don't know how quickly QBs tend to go, but I can absolutely see your point. With QBs getting scooped up quickly, it makes sense to lock in a for sure starter and see what RBs fall to you in round 2.

[abloom]

I think with it being SF, you got to go with either Dak or Lamar. But I can also see the case for a stud RB in Barkley or Taylor there and taking the best QB starting in round 2.

My opinion on this is that the QB tend to dry up quickly in SF drafts. I'd rather gamble on getting a RB a few picks later than Taylor, than to miss out on my top tier of QBs.

I do see that it's 10 team now so I wouldnt rule out JT being there in the 2nd at #15... And if a lot of teams go more RB/WR heavy, I wouldn't mind grabbing 2 top QB

True. I'm not very familiar with SF drafts, so I honestly don't know how quickly QBs tend to go, but I can absolutely see your point. With QBs getting scooped up quickly, it makes sense to lock in a for sure starter and see what RBs fall to you in round 2.

It really depends on the number of teams. There is a huge difference between a 10 team and 12 team SF.

10 team SF has QB values closer to 16 team 1QB than it does 12 team SF.

[Jigga94]

My opinion on this is that the QB tend to dry up quickly in SF drafts. I'd rather gamble on getting a RB a few picks later than Taylor, than to miss out on my top tier of QBs.

I do see that it's 10 team now so I wouldnt rule out JT being there in the 2nd at #15... And if a lot of teams go more RB/WR heavy, I wouldn't mind grabbing 2 top QB

True. I'm not very familiar with SF drafts, so I honestly don't know how quickly QBs tend to go, but I can absolutely see your point. With QBs getting scooped up quickly, it makes sense to lock in a for sure starter and see what RBs fall to you in round 2.

It really depends on the number of teams. There is a huge difference between a 10 team and 12 team SF.

10 team SF has QB values closer to 16 team 1QB than it does 12 team SF.

You are correct. It mostly just depends on what everyone does before you. I could see you picking from Kyler and Allen at 6 if RB go early