Jonathan Taylor or 1.01 and 2.01? SF

[bridger32]

12 Team Superflex TE Prem League (Signature 1)

Thoughts on me giving up JT for 1.01 and 2.01? Obviously taking Lawrence. I would still have 1.06 too where I could probably pickup a RB (Harris or Etienne).

Thanks for the help!

[abloom]

Give me the 1.01 and 2.01 here, but I wonder if you can get out a little more.

[Gator Sens]

Value is definitely on the Lawrence side in SF.

[BradysBunch]

I think that is a good return on JT in SF. You need a QB.

[Grimmer]

Voted for JT before seeing it was SF which would change my vote. Might be worth putting that in the title for those like me that vote too quickly

[bridger32]

Voted for JT before seeing it was SF which would change my vote. Might be worth putting that in the title for those like me that vote too quickly

Done!

[Bulletproof]

Lawrence and the 2.01. Not close for me

[krtbuckeye]

I’d hate to lose JT, but value is definitely on 1.01/2.01 in SF.

[MaddMadden]

Yeah, I'd have to agree with the masses here.

However, for someone to make this offer, they must really believe in JT. I feel like you could counter and see if they will add in a RB with upside to the deal. Maybe a guy equivalent to a 3rd or 4th round value (RB30+ that may be a handcuff/ needing an opp).

[richardweston1233]

I love JT, I just traded for him in my league but a 12 team superflex im taking Lawrence and 2.01 and you have 1.06 to grab Etienne or harris depending on who's available there. It would be even nicer if you could get pitts at 2.01.

[ravn88]

I love JT, I just traded for him in my league but a 12 team superflex im taking Lawrence and 2.01 and you have 1.06 to grab Etienne or harris depending on who's available there. It would be even nicer if you could get pitts at 2.01.

There is something wrong if Pitts is falling out of the 1st round in a TE Premium