1.4 for which potential stud?

[NY CAT]

I'm thinking of trading 1.4.
The following players are under consideration.
C. Claypool
B. AYUK
C. AKERS
Which one would you choose?

[DonBrazi]

Format is gonna play a role here.

Without knowing any details, I chose Akers because he's the one of the three I value more. But it's certainly possible that I'd value the pick more in the right format.

[Adam_172]

In a vacuum, the pick but will depend on the format really.

[SoftwoodGrampian]

Akers

[Mtt33]

Agree let us know the format. Akers almost regardless of format though...

[jwb32]

Akers >> Aiyuk > Claypool
Assuming 1QB, you won’t get Akers for the 1.04. And the 1.04 is an overpay for the others.

[krtbuckeye]

Outside of a 16 team SF league where you need a QB badly, I’d say Akers over the pick.

[Gator Sens]

Akers - on value alone

Aiyuk - is close to my top choice as I think he could really take off.

Claypool - I would keep the pick over Claypool.

I dont think many Akers are selling for that pick however in a 1 QB format.

[cptjonesb]

Format is gonna play a role here.

Without knowing any details, I chose Akers because he's the one of the three I value more. But it's certainly possible that I'd value the pick more in the right format.

This

[NY CAT]

1QB Format
Can start 2-3 running backs

[tsarpepe]

Akers, but he's closer to 1.01 in value now.

[murphysxm]

Akers is not going to be sold for the 1.04. Everybody that drafted him is proud of themselves as he was a polarizing valuation this time last year. I want the pick over either WR.

[SoftwoodGrampian]

I choose C over C

[JJRules]

Akers regardless of Format IMO. I would keep the pick over those WRs tho.

[Shoreline Steamers]

Have to say the value is with Akers if you could actually make this deal happen. I'm skeptical you could, but worth a shot. Neither WR would have me sending my 1.04 to make the switch.