Dynasty League Football Forum

I was just offered Barkley, 2.05 and 2.06 for cmc.... is it worth it and can Barkley stay healthy. On the flipside, can cmc stay healthy??? Which direction would you go??

I am a huge Barkley fan so I might consider this, but on consensus I think the gap between the two is much more than a couple of mid 2nds. There is a lot less risk with CMC and I'd think it would take at least a 1st to bridge that.

I would hold CMC, Barkley could come back and be great, I’d just rather stick with CMC as a more risk-averse play.

CMC for me without a 1st being included. CMC is a monster when on the field week in and week out.

Thanks guys!!!

give me barkley over cmc straight up...

i dont think weve seen the best of barkley yet, jmo

SkinZ187 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:19 pm give me barkley over cmc straight up...

i dont think weve seen the best of barkley yet, jmo

This is my thoughts too.

CMC has had a TON of touches the last three seasons too.

we probably haven't seen the best of Barkley yet...but there is no denying he is an injury risk, thus CMC is worth more.

I have both Barkley and CMC even. Both are super talented RBs and if they stay on the field they are almost guaranteed top 5 RBs. If he is adding to move from one to the other, I'd take it.

Hold CMC for a 1st on top of Barkley.

ACL injuries not only cost seasons, they also cost career years.

i have them pretty close, matter-of-preference-close (and prefer barkley). if you can squeeze a 1st, by all means do it, but i'd take the two 2nds too.

i don't get the CMC has less risk thing. they're RBs, they get banged up. a string of injuries that makes your team shut you down is just as worrying as an ACL tear imo.