Give Metcalf for Tyreek?

[MFundercover]

Team 1 in my sig. Won the chamionship last season. Hill could catapult me to a repeat, but Metcalf is a great building block to stay relevant in this league for many years.

[Gator Sens]

Both are top 5 dynasty WRs. I think Hill is the most explosive asset and has the highest ceiling in dynasty (none QB), I would hold Hill. Likely comes down to preference and if you are looking to get younger, but Hill will be in his prime for years.

[krtbuckeye]

This is a tough one, but with your WR corps as a whole, I would hold Metcalf. You have great WRs ahead of him, so you don’t have to rely on him as your week in-week out WR1. I’d rather hold his youth (not that Tyreek is old) for down the line.

[MFundercover]

Both are top 5 dynasty WRs. I think Hill is the most explosive asset and has the highest ceiling in dynasty (none QB), I would hold Hill. Likely comes down to preference and if you are looking to get younger, but Hill will be in his prime for years.

I actually have Metcalf now. Tyreek owner is rebuilding and wants to pair Metcalf with his Jefferson.

[Gator Sens]

Both are top 5 dynasty WRs. I think Hill is the most explosive asset and has the highest ceiling in dynasty (none QB), I would hold Hill. Likely comes down to preference and if you are looking to get younger, but Hill will be in his prime for years.

I actually have Metcalf now. Tyreek owner is rebuilding and wants to pair Metcalf with his Jefferson.

My mistake, thanks for the heads up. I just noticed that in your signature. I prefer Hill to Metcalf.

[YourAverageFan]

Hill for me

[jwb32]

While I prefer Hill in a vacuum, I think I'd hold Metcalf with the collective age of your starting WRs. And Metcalf as your WR4 is more than sufficient to win another title.

[wheath.sharp]

If he is trying to acquire DK from you see what you can get on top of Tyreek. Otherwise, I personally don’t like to do lateral, position for position trades like that - so I’d hold DK unless you’re getting a little on top of Hill.

[jenkins.math]

If he is trying to acquire DK from you see what you can get on top of Tyreek. Otherwise, I personally don’t like to do lateral, position for position trades like that - so I’d hold DK unless you’re getting a little on top of Hill.

X2

[pmart33]

Hold on to Metcalf if the offer is straight up. Don't give up 3 years of WR1 production for free. As a DK owner I wouldn't move him for Hill unless I was getting at least an early 2nd in return.

[Buckhill Bombers]

I like Hill more than Metcalf personally. Both are top 5 elite studs

[MyTeam]

Very lateral move that makes you older. I would want a slight upgrade somewhere else to make the move.

[psfox2010]

I'd personally prefer Hill but could understand a person going with DK.

[KING]

Hill to win now

[smmcfarl]

Really just a preference move here unless you are worried about the age gap. No need to just swap players unless you really want the guy. See if you can get a little something added.