https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=211841
Team could be a competitor, it was close last year. Notable players include:realmacaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:50 pm Doesn’t seem like an overpay to me, not in SF. I assume it’s for a rebuild, not a win now
Might take a couple years to back to that level (maybe not if he’s a super stud out the gate) but i still like it. Good trade.blemly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:00 pmTeam could be a competitor, it was close last year. Notable players include:realmacaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:50 pm Doesn’t seem like an overpay to me, not in SF. I assume it’s for a rebuild, not a win now
QB - Cam, Watson
RB - AK, Jacobs, Dobbins
WR - Tyreek, AJB, Woods, McLaurin
x2 - Rodgers is still a great piece on the field, but his value is not likely to be what it should be based on age.krtbuckeye wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:03 pm If this is for Team 3 in your sig, I’d make that deal for Lawrence.
In this league I hold a mid 2nd and 4.10 and 5.10.realmacaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:08 pmMight take a couple years to back to that level (maybe not if he’s a super stud out the gate) but i still like it. Good trade.blemly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:00 pmTeam could be a competitor, it was close last year. Notable players include:realmacaroni wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:50 pm Doesn’t seem like an overpay to me, not in SF. I assume it’s for a rebuild, not a win now
QB - Cam, Watson
RB - AK, Jacobs, Dobbins
WR - Tyreek, AJB, Woods, McLaurin
You got the 1.10, what other picks do u hold?
I dont use trade calculators at all and never have for just this type of reason. Real head scratchers sometimes.blemly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:46 pm This is a good example of how trade calculators are not accurate measures of trades, and one reason why I value other actual fantasy players’ opinions on this forum. One site had this as an absolute massacre for me (180 v 375) and another was not favorable either (46 v 63). Trade calculators are fine and I don’t dislike them, but I didn’t look at them before making this trade and often don’t. Certainly not the end all be all.
Totally agree on this. A trade calculator can really only evaluate a deal in a vacuum. Yes, some can be tweaked by league size and format, but none are granular enough to take into account starting requirements or the role that a certain player does/will fill in your build.Gator Sens wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 7:08 pmI dont use trade calculators at all and never have for just this type of reason. Real head scratchers sometimes.blemly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:46 pm This is a good example of how trade calculators are not accurate measures of trades, and one reason why I value other actual fantasy players’ opinions on this forum. One site had this as an absolute massacre for me (180 v 375) and another was not favorable either (46 v 63). Trade calculators are fine and I don’t dislike them, but I didn’t look at them before making this trade and often don’t. Certainly not the end all be all.
This was weak for 1.1 (lawrence) imo. It was very weak in a format that is not qb and/or te prem.blemly wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:46 pm This is a good example of how trade calculators are not accurate measures of trades, and one reason why I value other actual fantasy players’ opinions on this forum. One site had this as an absolute massacre for me (180 v 375) and another was not favorable either (46 v 63). Trade calculators are fine and I don’t dislike them, but I didn’t look at them before making this trade and often don’t. Certainly not the end all be all.