Pittman/Sutton for 1.08?

[Harrison92]

I would target Pitts at 1.08 to add to my TE core. Worst case, I would take BPA flex.

I'm targeting a specific player at 1.07 so using that pick wouldn't be an option.

Would you trade either WR for 1.08 straight up?

[realmacaroni]

Those WRs both have some question marks around them or their situation. But I think Pittman is more valuable and maybe worth the 1.8. Sutton feels mors like an early/mid 2nd

[Gator Sens]

I would rather move Pittman of the two if you are wanting to make the move.

[Mjvb5]

Pittman, yes
Sutton, no

[krtbuckeye]

I would possibly move Pittman for 1.08. I actually had this offer made to me a few weeks ago and ultimately declined, but it was a toss up. I wouldn’t be letting Sutton go for 1.08 though. I’m not high on any Denver pass catchers at the moment, but I’d hold Sutton for now given that his value is at its lowest yet.

[MyTeam]

I don't think Pitts lasts til 8.

[CGW]

I'd hang tight on both of those WR for the 1.08. If I had to sell one it would be Pittman, but I wouldn't feel good about it. Once these two get real QBs both have great upside.

Also you have Andrews, so it's not like you need to overpay to get another unknown TE. I think he bounces back in 21. I'd probably just move Andrews for Waller/Kittle and have the sure thing if you are dead set on improving at TE.

[Mtt33]

Definitely wouldn’t move sutton for that, that’s probably about right for Pittman if you don’t like him.

[jwb32]

Pitts vs Pittman seems to be causing some confusion in this thread. That said, moving Pittman for 1.08 is fine, though it's mostly a lateral move.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

Pittman, yes
Sutton, no

Same for me

[franchise 8]

I prefer Pittman to Sutton. I think Sutton will always have to compete for targets and Pittman will eventually get a heavy dose of the air share in Indy ( especially if they land Stafford ). That said, if you knew for sure you could get Pitts I'd do it based on your glut of WR 2/3's. Pitts could be a real positional upgrade and advantage

[Prison_Mike]

I prefer Pittman to Sutton. I think Sutton will always have to compete for targets and Pittman will eventually get a heavy dose of the air share in Indy ( especially if they land Stafford ). That said, if you knew for sure you could get Pitts I'd do it based on your glut of WR 2/3's. Pitts could be a real positional upgrade and advantage

I think this is the key; Will you regret this move if Pitts gets drafted at 1.07?