Kittle / Andrews
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:34 am
What's the difference between the two right now? I am thinking about moving Kittle for Andrews with the hope I could get something decent thrown in the deal.
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=209484
I've already tried moving Kittle for Hock with zero luck. I don't think the guy would do it 1 for 1.abloom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:00 am Instead of moving Kittle for Andrews I would rather move him for Hock. You can probably get something a little bit more back, still have decent production, and higher upside. I'm thinking that Andrews will always be in the second teir of TEs, good phyiscally and in a good offense, but not a focus of his team's offense. If we look at the other TEs that do well, its high volume offenses that focus on the player. Kelce in KC, Kittle in SF, Waller in OAK/LV, Ertz (before he lost a step) in Phi, Gronk in NE. I think Hock in Det has a better chance of this happening than Andrews in BAL. I think Baltimore is going to be more run focused and Lamar is not as good as the other QBs as far as passing. Actually situationally I think Andrews's and Kittle's situations are fairly similar, but Kittle is just such a better tallent than Andrews.
I can see that. Hock has played well the past few weeks, finally starting to live up to his draft status. I'm not high on Andrews, I think he is too td dependent and I don't think that LJax is a quality passer which hurts the receiving core there. Could you add Reed off waivers? What about Hurst? He has played better lately and could come cheaper.My BallZach Ertz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:20 amI've already tried moving Kittle for Hock with zero luck. I don't think the guy would do it 1 for 1.abloom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:00 am Instead of moving Kittle for Andrews I would rather move him for Hock. You can probably get something a little bit more back, still have decent production, and higher upside. I'm thinking that Andrews will always be in the second teir of TEs, good phyiscally and in a good offense, but not a focus of his team's offense. If we look at the other TEs that do well, its high volume offenses that focus on the player. Kelce in KC, Kittle in SF, Waller in OAK/LV, Ertz (before he lost a step) in Phi, Gronk in NE. I think Hock in Det has a better chance of this happening than Andrews in BAL. I think Baltimore is going to be more run focused and Lamar is not as good as the other QBs as far as passing. Actually situationally I think Andrews's and Kittle's situations are fairly similar, but Kittle is just such a better tallent than Andrews.
I got Dwelley off of waivers who I think will be a nice fill in because I don't think Reed will stay healthy.dblj1199 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:26 amI can see that. Hock has played well the past few weeks, finally starting to live up to his draft status. I'm not high on Andrews, I think he is too td dependent and I don't think that LJax is a quality passer which hurts the receiving core there. Could you add Reed off waivers? What about Hurst? He has played better lately and could come cheaper.My BallZach Ertz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:20 amI've already tried moving Kittle for Hock with zero luck. I don't think the guy would do it 1 for 1.abloom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:00 am Instead of moving Kittle for Andrews I would rather move him for Hock. You can probably get something a little bit more back, still have decent production, and higher upside. I'm thinking that Andrews will always be in the second teir of TEs, good phyiscally and in a good offense, but not a focus of his team's offense. If we look at the other TEs that do well, its high volume offenses that focus on the player. Kelce in KC, Kittle in SF, Waller in OAK/LV, Ertz (before he lost a step) in Phi, Gronk in NE. I think Hock in Det has a better chance of this happening than Andrews in BAL. I think Baltimore is going to be more run focused and Lamar is not as good as the other QBs as far as passing. Actually situationally I think Andrews's and Kittle's situations are fairly similar, but Kittle is just such a better tallent than Andrews.
That's unfortunate. I'd probably just look to fill in TE somewhere else then.My BallZach Ertz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:20 amI've already tried moving Kittle for Hock with zero luck. I don't think the guy would do it 1 for 1.abloom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 8:00 am Instead of moving Kittle for Andrews I would rather move him for Hock. You can probably get something a little bit more back, still have decent production, and higher upside. I'm thinking that Andrews will always be in the second teir of TEs, good phyiscally and in a good offense, but not a focus of his team's offense. If we look at the other TEs that do well, its high volume offenses that focus on the player. Kelce in KC, Kittle in SF, Waller in OAK/LV, Ertz (before he lost a step) in Phi, Gronk in NE. I think Hock in Det has a better chance of this happening than Andrews in BAL. I think Baltimore is going to be more run focused and Lamar is not as good as the other QBs as far as passing. Actually situationally I think Andrews's and Kittle's situations are fairly similar, but Kittle is just such a better tallent than Andrews.
i love this trade for the team acquiring kittle! especially in a must start 2 TE league...blacklab1010 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:05 pm In my league kittle just went for andrews and gurley!! Our league starting requirements might have something to do with it??