Multiple Mahomes offers..thoughts?

[repkllrs]

Pull Kupp or Cooper from B and send it back. They are all passes as they are

[Jmason6009]

An easy no for me on all 3. B is the closest but I still don’t like it.

[MyTeam]

I would hold the Mahomes side in all but as others said, B isn't far off.

[24FlavorsofFun]

Yea I'm pretty easily passing on all 3 of these.
A - Evans isn't that much of an upgrade on Cooper to cover the Mahomes/Wilson gap. The other pieces coming back are nothings.
B - is so/so but still not close
C - Is just hot garbage. Rodgers isn't 2010 Rodgers despite all of the sports media world continuing to act like he is (he also REAL old).

[Yarnith]

I dont like any of them and I dont see how B is even close?

Mahomes is a Huge upgrade over Murray. Keep in mind Mahomes has more fantasy points and only played in 14 games.
Kupp and Golladay are about equal stats, points age. Essentially gain little in this.
Cooper is far better than Ridley and this is a pure Ridley hype move.
CEH is better than Conner but only if CEH is all we hope he is and Conner is a bust this year.

This is a bad trade with only 1 significant upgrade for you and a significant downgrade. That downgrade is a QB in a SF league so this is an awful idea and should not be done. Mahomes and CMC are probably the 2 players that should demand stupid overpays. It should be imbalanced but why would you even trade SF Mahomes unless you are in stupidly overpay trade in the first place?

[Nflnz]

I dont like any of them and I dont see how B is even close?

Mahomes is a Huge upgrade over Murray. Keep in mind Mahomes has more fantasy points and only played in 14 games.
Kupp and Golladay are about equal stats, points age. Essentially gain little in this.
Cooper is far better than Ridley and this is a pure Ridley hype move.
CEH is better than Conner but only if CEH is all we hope he is and Conner is a bust this year.

This is a bad trade with only 1 significant upgrade for you and a significant downgrade. That downgrade is a QB in a SF league so this is an awful idea and should not be done. Mahomes and CMC are probably the 2 players that should demand stupid overpays. It should be imbalanced but why would you even trade SF Mahomes unless you are in stupidly overpay trade in the first place?

Thanks for the good feedback. I have rejected all offers. Can I run one more by you that I have on the table:

Give: Mahomes, Conner, Kupp
Get: Watson, Zeke, Metcalf

Still not close?

[Mtt33]

I dont like any of them and I dont see how B is even close?

Mahomes is a Huge upgrade over Murray. Keep in mind Mahomes has more fantasy points and only played in 14 games.
Kupp and Golladay are about equal stats, points age. Essentially gain little in this.
Cooper is far better than Ridley and this is a pure Ridley hype move.
CEH is better than Conner but only if CEH is all we hope he is and Conner is a bust this year.

This is a bad trade with only 1 significant upgrade for you and a significant downgrade. That downgrade is a QB in a SF league so this is an awful idea and should not be done. Mahomes and CMC are probably the 2 players that should demand stupid overpays. It should be imbalanced but why would you even trade SF Mahomes unless you are in stupidly overpay trade in the first place?

“Ceh is better than conner but only if...” come on you know this is an absurd statement to help your argument. Hes going 50 spots higher in ADP and way more than that in the startups I’ve seen.

The only reason this offer wouldn’t be close other than not liking any specific players in the deal is if you feel in order to trade Mahomes you have to get absolutely blown away, which I certainly wouldn’t blame you for, but on paper this is close.

[moishetreats]

Give: Mahomes, Conner, Kupp
Get: Watson, Zeke, Metcalf

Still not close?

NOW I'm getting tempted...

[Needalife]

While the new offer is relatively even, you are downgrading at 2 spots here (unless you are super-bullish on DK). Zeke is an awesome upgrade in the deal but Mahomes is built for the long haul more so than Watson who plays a little recklessly and depends on his legs more. Kupp is a stud and I’m not liking the drop from him to DK.

I just want an overpay for Mahomes and not an even pay. He’s the #1 asset in SF for the foreseeable future.

[FantasyFoosball]

Thanks for the good feedback. I have rejected all offers. Can I run one more by you that I have on the table:

Give: Mahomes, Conner, Kupp
Get: Watson, Zeke, Metcalf

Still not close?

I think this is close, but I still would not do it.

Mahomes > Watson
Kupp > DK
Conner << Zeke

But Mahomes is the best piece here. So you are downgrading at two positions, QB and WR, just to upgrade at RB. I think this hurts your overall roster and competitiveness.

I think this is closer than any of the other offers though. It's heading in the right direction.

[BeeziBad]

C--hell no
A--no
B--still no but the closest, especially if you are 100% on board the Kyler train

piling on. none of these are close.

[yellowdart2448]

As many have said, if you’re the one giving up by far the most valuable piece then the other owner HAS to overpay. Anything that you look at and think is even is a loss for you. I’d say no matter what players are offered, a least one first next year has to be included if not a 2nd or another first in 2022.