OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.

What side?

OBJ
8
50%
Cooks, N’Keal, 1.12
8
50%
 
Total votes: 16

Skelly11
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:32 am

OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby Skelly11 » Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:22 pm

Been offered OBJ for those assets. Second team in signature. Which would you prefer?
10 man Dynasty 0.5 pt PPR
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex

QB: Wentz, Jones, Geno, Willis, Ridder
RB: CMC, Zeke, Ekeler, Hunt, M Davis, J Wilson, E. Mitchell, McKinnon
WR: Cooks, Tyreek, Diontae Johnson, Julio, Watkins, Boyd, D. Parker, MVS, Gage, Cobb, Thornton
TE: Engram, Tonyan, Dissly, J. Johnson

12 Team Dynasty, 0.5 PPR, TE Premium
2QB, 3RB, 4WR, 2TE, 2 Flex

QB: Mahomes, Tannehill, Foles, Willis, Ehlinger, Howell, Corral, Darnold
RB: Ekeler, Aaron Jones, Hunt, G. Bernard, J Wilson, Haskins, K. Williams
WR: Tyreek, Kupp, MT, Cooks, Watkins, N’Keal, Parker, Gage, Claypool, Doubs, Dyami, Skowronek, Blackshear
TE: Gronk, Uzomah, Dissly, Hendershot, Stoll

StripesOfKC
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 6:38 pm

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby StripesOfKC » Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:25 pm

Harry is a bust IMO and you are getting some value for him. Take OBJ and run here

User avatar
Gator Sens
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 53938
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby Gator Sens » Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:29 pm

Beckham. Cooks health is a risk and Harry has shown nothing albeit possibly due to health. Value alone is on the Beckham side.

User avatar
chalorpas
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:31 pm

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby chalorpas » Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:33 pm

OBJ for sure. Harry and Cooks have minimal value.

User avatar
FantasyFoosball
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7173
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 10:23 am

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby FantasyFoosball » Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:31 am

Value wise this is OBJ, but you have deep starting requirements, and your team looks like it's in bad need of a rebuild. Do you think you can compete? Do you think you could sell OBJ for more? I don't know that you want to be taking on a guy that's about to turn 28 if you are not going to be competitive. If you think he would help put you over the top though, then I'd do it.
Team One:
10 Team Salary Cap League w/ IDP - Est. 2018
2018: Champions!
2019: Champions!!
2020: 2nd Place
2021: Loss in Semis
2022: Champions!!!
.5 PPR/$200 budget
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/TE, 1 K, 2 DL, 2 LB, 2 DB, 3 DL/LB/DB

QB - Mahomes
RB - CMC, White, Sanders, Herbert, Foreman, McKinnon
WR - Diggs, Ridley, Godwin, KJ Osborn, Woods, Claypool, Campbell
TE - Kittle, Goedert, Gesicki
K - Bass
DL - Reddick, Jones, M. Sweat
LB - R. Smith, Wagner, Leonard, White, Perryman, Cashman
DB - Byard, Bell, Hobbs, Jenkins

2024: 3rd

Team Two:
DLF Advice Forum League
14 Team PPR SF/TE Premium (2PPR)
2020: 4th Place
2021: 2nd Place
1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 1SF, 2Flex
QB - Allen, Carr, Mayfield, Trask, Zappe
RB - Harris, Gibson, Herbert, K. Miller, C. Brown
WR - MT, G. Davis, Bourne, Skyy Moore, Reynolds, Shakir, A.T. Perry, C. Moore, Hinton
TE - Kittle, Andrews, Woods

2024: 1, 2, 3, 4

dhanks91
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1041
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:08 pm

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby dhanks91 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:09 pm

I would take the OBJ side. If he bounces back this year (which I think he will) you'll be able to sell him for much more

Mtt33
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 1:19 pm

Re: OBJ for Cooks, N’Keal and 1.12

Postby Mtt33 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:24 pm

Initial reaction without knowing the league was obj. Looking at the league, 2 qb, 14 starters, and only 1/2 ppr I voted the package but I think it’s very close. Elite WRs obviously take a hit in this format, While depth is important having to start 4, so even when the package is likely 3 WRs it makes it closer because the prize (obj in this case) loses some value. I do think this is very close though.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests