6.01 in 14 team SF coming up

[AresGodOWar3]

Team 11 SF startup , With these setting who has the most value out of everyone of them ?

QBs Darnold , Jimmy , Cam , Brees , Cousins
RBs MG , Bell , Montgomery , Conner , Carson
WRs KA , Terry , Chark , Diggs , Woods
TEs Hooper , Hurst , Fant , Higbee

Not even going by my team who would you take in a full Dynasty ?

[abloom]

Darnold, very easily darnold. If you don't like darnold, give me Cousins. But its going to be one of those.

[UnsafeAtAnySpd]

Darnold. QBs never get cheaper in superflex than the startup. Very unlikely, in an established league, you'd be able to get Darnold straight up for any of those other players.

[Mjvb5]

Darnold, very easily darnold. If you don't like darnold, give me Cousins. But its going to be one of those.

Exactly my thoughts, darnold for upside cousins for floor

[FantasyFoosball]

Agreed. I'd take Darnold. Cousins would be second.

[Gator Sens]

Darnold

[MyTeam]

Darnold. If QBs are staying, keep taking them.

[pmart33]

Cousins for me. I'll take the stable production and job security for minimum the next 2-3 years. He finished as a low end QB1/high end QB2 (depending on your league's scoring settings) despite playing in an extremely conservative offense.

I'm lower on Darnold's long term outlook than most though. The Jets ruin QBs, and best case he will be on his 3rd HC in 4 years once Gase gets canned. Just not a situation I'm comfortable with, but there is upside there.

[imi814]

Darnold. QBs never get cheaper in superflex than the startup. Very unlikely, in an established league, you'd be able to get Darnold straight up for any of those other players.

I agree with this. Also in 2 years Gordon bell carson and Conner may have minimal value but cousins and jimmy (and maybe darnold) should still be worth the same.
This is dynasty— draft for long term.

[Mtt33]

Darnold easily the most valuable here for me And I would take him with your team, but since you have 2 strong rbs you’re set up to win now so I could see going away from qb and grabbing one of the WRs.

[AresGodOWar3]

Thank you for the advice , I am trying to drop back right now but if I don't I'll take Darnold he is under 25 so he passes my 25 and under rule

[abloom]

Thank you for the advice , I am trying to drop back right now but if I don't I'll take Darnold he is under 25 so he passes my 25 and under rule

While not opposed to dropping back, I think both Darnold and cousins should have been gone by the 6.01 in a 14 team SF league. I think the value there is good.

[AresGodOWar3]

Thank you for the advice , I am trying to drop back right now but if I don't I'll take Darnold he is under 25 so he passes my 25 and under rule

While not opposed to dropping back, I think both Darnold and cousins should have been gone by the 6.01 in a 14 team SF league. I think the value there is good.

Yeah I ended up going with Darnold , As soon as I took him 6 more QBs went in a roll.. I took Goff then 7 out of 9 picks were QBs , I took Darnold then 7 of 7 picks were QBs

[abloom]

Thank you for the advice , I am trying to drop back right now but if I don't I'll take Darnold he is under 25 so he passes my 25 and under rule

While not opposed to dropping back, I think both Darnold and cousins should have been gone by the 6.01 in a 14 team SF league. I think the value there is good.

Yeah I ended up going with Darnold , As soon as I took him 6 more QBs went in a roll.. I took Goff then 7 out of 9 picks were QBs , I took Darnold then 7 of 7 picks were QBs

Sounds like you're hitting value in both those spots then.