Barkley vs Package

[Packerland]

1 QB, PPR, 12 Team League, start 10

Give: Miles Sanders, Golladay, Boston Scott
Get: Saquon

Roster Right now:

QB: Dak, Teddy
RB: Sanders, JT, Scott, Edmonds, Damien Williams, Love, Hill
WR: Kenny G, ARob, Boyd, Gallup, Slayton, Crowder, Sims
TE: Fant, Gesicki, Knox
D/ST Baltimore, Chargers
K: Gay

Thoughts?

[Gator Sens]

I dont think Barkley puts you over the top, so I would hold. Golladay is a great player worth more on your team than on the market.

[murphysxm]

I also think you are too far away to mortgage two young assets

[J. Edgar]

I'm fine with the trade, the Sanders hype is out of control.

[megager]

Did you do the deal?
I'd lean Barkley.
Sanders is at his peak value now and while I do like him, I think at the end of last season few would have said this was enough for Saquon.
Golladay a nice piece but you have ARob, Boyd, Gallup, Slayton so still strong there.

I am considering packages for Barkley but none have been this good. If I received this offer I would have thought long and hard about it, but I'd likely have stuck, even though my roster has a lot of holes.

[The.Big.Spank]

Boy, thats a tough one. Good luck.

[Edgy68]

I think Sanders and Golladay edge Barkley, even more so with the state of your team. You need more starters, not fewer.

This would be a decent price for a contender who needed to consolidate 13-14 starters down closer to 10.

[chalorpas]

Your roster does have some holes but I’d rather have the Barkley side, personally, even if you have to give up some depth. He is simply the best asset of the deal by far.

[FantasyFoosball]

Barkley for me. That's where the value is. I don't see that team competing either way, but I think you have some good young pieces and Barkley is young enough that you can build around him.

[Adam_172]

Barkley then move him on. I think you can get more.

[henry1jg]

1 QB, PPR, 12 Team League, start 10

Give: Miles Sanders, Golladay, Boston Scott
Get: Saquon

Roster Right now:

QB: Dak, Teddy
RB: Sanders, JT, Scott, Edmonds, Damien Williams, Love, Hill
WR: Kenny G, ARob, Boyd, Gallup, Slayton, Crowder, Sims
TE: Fant, Gesicki, Knox
D/ST Baltimore, Chargers
K: Gay

Thoughts?

This is very tough. First reaction, that's a cheap Saquan acquisition. Looking into it more with your team and how Saquan & Sanders performed wk 7 (when Saquan returned) on, I think I will say hold pat.

Your starting lineup is better with Miles and Kenny G than with Saquan and whichever WR you start in flex between Crowder and Slayton.

That said, it's tough to turn down Saquan. Lol

[SteveMaddensShoes]

Easily Barkley for me. Even if you trade him later the value is all on Barkley

[Goddard]

Barkley

[pmart33]

It's a reasonable price to pay for Barkley. I do have some concerns about your depth if you're trying to make a run this year, so my question is what do you have for Picks? This is a win now type of move and if you're going to make it you should also be looking to acquire another legit RB and one more legit WR and truly compete. Just my 2 cents.

[Packerland]

It's a reasonable price to pay for Barkley. I do have some concerns about your depth if you're trying to make a run this year, so my question is what do you have for Picks? This is a win now type of move and if you're going to make it you should also be looking to acquire another legit RB and one more legit WR and truly compete. Just my 2 cents.

Next year I have a first, 2 2nds, 2 3rds, a 4th and 5th.