Page 1 of 4

OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:10 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Its pretty unusual scoring in this best ball PPR dynasty league. Rbs get .5 PPR with .2 points for each carry and .2 points for targets. WRs get 1.25 PPR and 1.25 points per first down. TE's get 1.5 PPR and 1.5 points per first down.

I'm one pick away with the following roster:

Lamar Jackson
Kamara
Godwin, Evans

Best players available for my 4.4 pick
QBs- Ryan, Stafford, Darnold, Brees
RBs- Aaron Jones, Ekeler, Fournette
WRs- Cooper, JuJu, AJ Brown, Julio, Beckham
TEs- Engram, Waller, Henry, Fant
Picks 1.6, 1.7, 2021 1.1.....

This is my last pick until 7.9. Seems there is still very good value at WR, followed by RB, and maybe even TE. Not sure I'm loving any of these QBs here, but realize 2 is ideal in this SF format. Thoughts??

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:24 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Anyone?

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:28 am
by MyTeam
I'd take Godwin

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:33 am
by Buckhill Bombers
MyTeam wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:28 am I'd take Godwin
I think Godwin scores the most poinst for sure...my only hesitation was should I consider Kamara due to less RBs than WRs...but Godwin should beast in this format. Last year he scored 27 pts per game with this scoring.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:45 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Took Godwin, thanks guys.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:55 am
by Gator Sens
Godwin would have by my route too. Good pick.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:57 am
by boobam13
good pick

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:01 am
by MyTeam
Is it superflex as well?

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:07 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Yes sir, a superflex. Here is the order so far:

Mahomes
CMC
Barkley
Lamar
Thomas
Watson
Murray
Nuk
Wilson
Prescott
Allen
Zeke

Kittle
Kelce
Andrews
Cook
Mixon
Wentz
Mayfield
1.1 rookie pick
Godwin

And I'm in trade talks to potentially move up to take this 2.10 pick.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:16 am
by WhatWouldDitkaDo
Hard to say with those crazy scoring settings, but I'd say Kamara given the PPC and PPT for RBs.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:19 am
by McCafsteez
Buckhill Bombers wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:07 am Yes sir, a superflex. Here is the order so far:

Mahomes
CMC
Barkley
Lamar
Thomas
Watson
Murray
Nuk
Wilson
Prescott
Allen
Zeke

Kittle
Kelce
Andrews
Cook
Mixon
Wentz
Mayfield
1.1 rookie pick
Godwin

And I'm in trade talks to potentially move up to take this 2.10 pick.
If you get that pick, I would definitely look to pick either Adams / Kamara / Hill / Chubb

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:20 am
by Gator Sens
McCafsteez wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:19 am
Buckhill Bombers wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:07 am Yes sir, a superflex. Here is the order so far:

Mahomes
CMC
Barkley
Lamar
Thomas
Watson
Murray
Nuk
Wilson
Prescott
Allen
Zeke

Kittle
Kelce
Andrews
Cook
Mixon
Wentz
Mayfield
1.1 rookie pick
Godwin

And I'm in trade talks to potentially move up to take this 2.10 pick.
If you get that pick, I would definitely look to pick either Adams / Kamara / Hill / Chubb
x2

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:23 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Have this offer

Give: 5.9, 6.4, 14.4.
Get: 2.10, 20.07

Thoughts? IF I take it, its either Kamara or Hill IMO...with Adams age, Rodgers declining, I like Hill considerably more.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:26 am
by Mtt33
Value is there for sure, I generally lean on the side of depth in best ball but that’s a good price for kamara or Hill.

Re: OTC who would you take here?

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:38 am
by Buckhill Bombers
Made the trade...sent one offer to move back 1 spot otherwise Ill pick...Kamara or Hill? Leaning towards Kamara but curious if anyone would take Hill instead...