SuperFlex Deal - Feedback

[TomfromBoston]

Selling: Haskins and Darnold

Buying: 1.6, 2.2, C Samuel and A Hooper.

My other QB's are , Dak, Cousins, Brissett, Grier, Stidham.

thoughts?

[Gator Sens]

Seems low. Darnold is still young and has shown big upside at times. Either way, you are selling two starting QB's in SF. I would want more coming back.

[TomfromBoston]

I kind of agree

[JungleCatz]

I’d hold Darnold

[Zacsby]

Not even crazy about Darnold and I'd still need more. That or drop Haskins from the deal.

[RB6]

It’s light.

[24FlavorsofFun]

Very light.

Just because you have the depth doesn't mean you need to give players away.

I'm sure Darnold/Haskins were both drafted before the 1.06 in their respective years.

[Hambone]

Piling on - in a SF, not nearly enough for 2 starting QBs

[Goddard]

Haskins = 1.06
Darnold >> everything else - and I like Hooper

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I am not on the same page and am not sure why Darnold is so beloved by the dynasty community. He's young and has potential, but he's stuck with Adam Gase for at least the next year or two. The Jets have a lot of work to do to get Darnold line help and receiver help as well. I see this as:

Darnold = 1.06
Hooper > Haskins

I'd make this trade and get the 2.02 + Samuel for basically free.

[FantasyFoosball]

You should be able to get more for two young starting QB's in a SF league. I'd want something a little more substantial back than Samuel and the 2.02.

The 1.06 and Hooper is fine, but I'd rather have something like another early to mid first than Samuel/2.02.

[TomfromBoston]

It does feel a little lite but neither are really proven so that's hurting, plus it's draft time and picks turn to gold.

[mmass]

this trade is light...

[LondonMonarchs]

Keep Darnold as your QB3